Exploration of clinicians’ perspectives of using a bereavement risk screening tool in a palliative care setting: a qualitative study

Q3 Nursing Bereavement Care Pub Date : 2020-09-01 DOI:10.1080/02682621.2020.1828769
Lois K. Lawler, E. Plunkett, Lise Johns, C. Noble, Rachel J. Wenke
{"title":"Exploration of clinicians’ perspectives of using a bereavement risk screening tool in a palliative care setting: a qualitative study","authors":"Lois K. Lawler, E. Plunkett, Lise Johns, C. Noble, Rachel J. Wenke","doi":"10.1080/02682621.2020.1828769","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract To minimise the adverse outcomes of prolonged complex bereavement, health professionals need effective risk screening tools to identify those at risk. However, existing tools can be challenging to implement in the clinical setting. This qualitative study aimed to explore clinicians’ perspectives and experiences of using the Bereavement Risk Index (BRI) screening tool, including identifying barriers and enablers regarding its use and what they perceived as important domains in bereavement risk screening. Data was collected through semi-structured group and individual interviews and deductively analysed using the Theoretical Domains Framework. Eleven participants employed in one regional palliative care service were interviewed. The results revealed three key implications: 1) a risk screening tool is highly beneficial, however contextual factors can limit its implementation; 2) clinician confidence in the tool and perception of the tool’s comprehensiveness are significant factors in its use; 3) feedback is needed as to whether clinicians’ assessment of bereavement risk remains accurate and valid in the longer term.","PeriodicalId":44115,"journal":{"name":"Bereavement Care","volume":"39 1","pages":"133 - 140"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/02682621.2020.1828769","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bereavement Care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02682621.2020.1828769","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Nursing","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Abstract To minimise the adverse outcomes of prolonged complex bereavement, health professionals need effective risk screening tools to identify those at risk. However, existing tools can be challenging to implement in the clinical setting. This qualitative study aimed to explore clinicians’ perspectives and experiences of using the Bereavement Risk Index (BRI) screening tool, including identifying barriers and enablers regarding its use and what they perceived as important domains in bereavement risk screening. Data was collected through semi-structured group and individual interviews and deductively analysed using the Theoretical Domains Framework. Eleven participants employed in one regional palliative care service were interviewed. The results revealed three key implications: 1) a risk screening tool is highly beneficial, however contextual factors can limit its implementation; 2) clinician confidence in the tool and perception of the tool’s comprehensiveness are significant factors in its use; 3) feedback is needed as to whether clinicians’ assessment of bereavement risk remains accurate and valid in the longer term.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
临床医生在姑息治疗环境中使用丧亲风险筛查工具的观点探讨:一项定性研究
摘要为了最大限度地减少长期复杂丧亲之痛的不良后果,卫生专业人员需要有效的风险筛查工具来识别风险人群。然而,现有的工具在临床环境中的实施可能具有挑战性。这项定性研究旨在探索临床医生使用丧亲风险指数(BRI)筛查工具的观点和经验,包括确定其使用的障碍和促成因素,以及他们认为丧亲风险筛查的重要领域。数据是通过半结构化的小组和个人访谈收集的,并使用理论领域框架进行演绎分析。采访了受雇于一个地区姑息治疗服务机构的11名参与者。研究结果揭示了三个关键含义:1)风险筛查工具非常有益,但背景因素可能会限制其实施;2) 临床医生对该工具的信心和对该工具全面性的感知是其使用的重要因素;3) 需要反馈临床医生对丧亲风险的评估是否长期准确有效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Bereavement Care
Bereavement Care SOCIAL WORK-
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
‘It would be quite good if there was somewhere that just did everything’: perspectives on death administration following a bereavement The impact of Covid-19 on bereavement care in Ireland: A national survey of bereavement care providers. The experience and support needs of adult family members who face a sudden adult death: A systematic review study wound that doesn't heal Reflections on some learning from the Covid-19 pandemic:
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1