Potential productivity of Arundo donax in two contrasting environments from medium-term experiments

IF 2.3 4区 农林科学 Q1 AGRONOMY Archives of Agronomy and Soil Science Pub Date : 2023-02-09 DOI:10.1080/03650340.2023.2174530
L. Sulas, P. Deligios, M. Cossu, L. Ledda, G. Re, F. Sanna, M. T. Tiloca, G. Urracci, A. Virdis
{"title":"Potential productivity of Arundo donax in two contrasting environments from medium-term experiments","authors":"L. Sulas, P. Deligios, M. Cossu, L. Ledda, G. Re, F. Sanna, M. T. Tiloca, G. Urracci, A. Virdis","doi":"10.1080/03650340.2023.2174530","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Marginal land exploitation devoted to versatile crops, such as giant reed, is related to the degree of land marginality. Two experiments were conducted in two sites of Sardinia (Italy) to investigate the effects of management on dry matter yield and water productivity (WP). Experiment 1 compared four crop evapotranspiration restoring treatments (100%, 75%, 50%, 25%, and a rainfed control) over 5 years. Experiment 2 lasted 7 years and investigated zero-input supply on crop response. Experiment 1, notwithstanding well-watered conditions (Irr100), showed a higher value of biomass production during the last year monitored, but yielding only 13.5 Mg DM ha−1 and with no significant difference from Irr75. Moreover, being equal the average dry matter yield, in the Irr100, we would save 3630 m3 of irrigation water by achieving the same WP recorded in the Irr25 (25% ETc restoring). Experiment 2, being equal rainfall amount, raised WP values that picked 8.2 kg m−3 during 2018. Results indicate that in less favourable soils as the Experiment 1, well-watered conditions do not ensure better crop growth and productivity, whereas in deep soils (Experiment 2) promising productive results, as well as ecosystem services, could be obtained without any input supply.","PeriodicalId":8154,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Agronomy and Soil Science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of Agronomy and Soil Science","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/03650340.2023.2174530","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT Marginal land exploitation devoted to versatile crops, such as giant reed, is related to the degree of land marginality. Two experiments were conducted in two sites of Sardinia (Italy) to investigate the effects of management on dry matter yield and water productivity (WP). Experiment 1 compared four crop evapotranspiration restoring treatments (100%, 75%, 50%, 25%, and a rainfed control) over 5 years. Experiment 2 lasted 7 years and investigated zero-input supply on crop response. Experiment 1, notwithstanding well-watered conditions (Irr100), showed a higher value of biomass production during the last year monitored, but yielding only 13.5 Mg DM ha−1 and with no significant difference from Irr75. Moreover, being equal the average dry matter yield, in the Irr100, we would save 3630 m3 of irrigation water by achieving the same WP recorded in the Irr25 (25% ETc restoring). Experiment 2, being equal rainfall amount, raised WP values that picked 8.2 kg m−3 during 2018. Results indicate that in less favourable soils as the Experiment 1, well-watered conditions do not ensure better crop growth and productivity, whereas in deep soils (Experiment 2) promising productive results, as well as ecosystem services, could be obtained without any input supply.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
中期试验结果表明,两种不同环境下黄竹的潜在生产力
用于种植多功能作物(如巨芦苇)的边际土地开发与土地边际程度有关。在意大利撒丁岛的两个地点进行了两个试验,研究了管理对干物质产量和水分生产力(WP)的影响。试验1比较了4种作物蒸散恢复处理(100%、75%、50%、25%和雨养对照)5年的差异。试验2为期7年,研究零投入供给对作物响应的影响。试验1在水分充足的条件下(Irr100)在监测的最后一年显示出较高的生物质产量,但产量仅为13.5 Mg DM ha - 1,与Irr75没有显著差异。此外,在平均干物质产量相等的情况下,在Irr100中,通过实现Irr25中记录的相同WP (25% ETc恢复),我们将节省3630 m3灌溉水。试验2在降雨量相同的情况下,提高了2018年的WP值,收获了8.2 kg m−3。结果表明,在条件较差的土壤(如试验1)中,水分充足的条件并不能确保更好的作物生长和生产力,而在深层土壤(试验2)中,没有任何投入供应就可以获得有希望的生产结果和生态系统服务。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
4.20%
发文量
107
期刊介绍: rchives of Agronomy and Soil Science is a well-established journal that has been in publication for over fifty years. The Journal publishes papers over the entire range of agronomy and soil science. Manuscripts involved in developing and testing hypotheses to understand casual relationships in the following areas: plant nutrition fertilizers manure soil tillage soil biotechnology and ecophysiology amelioration irrigation and drainage plant production on arable and grass land agroclimatology landscape formation and environmental management in rural regions management of natural and created wetland ecosystems bio-geochemical processes soil-plant-microbe interactions and rhizosphere processes soil morphology, classification, monitoring, heterogeneity and scales reuse of waste waters and biosolids of agri-industrial origin in soil are especially encouraged. As well as original contributions, the Journal also publishes current reviews.
期刊最新文献
Dust-induced metal toxicity alleviated by the combined effect of organic and inorganic amendments on soil and plant Determinants of minimal soil disturbance adoption over time and in the face of climate vulnerability Soil chemical characteristics, yield and technological quality of sugarcane under subsurface drip irrigation with treated sewage effluent Coated controlled-release urea improves soil NO3−−N accumulation, rubber yield and economic profit in a Hevea brasiliensis plantation Effects of the training system on water productivity and water footprint in Mediterranean vineyards
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1