Paramedic students need more training in left ventricular assist device — a pilot simulation study

Q3 Health Professions Disaster and Emergency Medicine Journal Pub Date : 2023-04-20 DOI:10.5603/demj.a2023.0015
T. Kłosiewicz, M. Rut, Sylwia Jałtuszewska, Andrzej Rut, Radosław Zalewski, Piotr Ziemak, M. Ladzinska, R. Podlewski, M. Puślecki
{"title":"Paramedic students need more training in left ventricular assist device — a pilot simulation study","authors":"T. Kłosiewicz, M. Rut, Sylwia Jałtuszewska, Andrzej Rut, Radosław Zalewski, Piotr Ziemak, M. Ladzinska, R. Podlewski, M. Puślecki","doi":"10.5603/demj.a2023.0015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"INTRODUCTION: Mechanical Circulation Systems are a promising therapy for patients with end-stage of heart failure. Left ventricular assist device (LVAD) enforces using of concomitant anticoagulant therapy. This may lead to severe complications. LVAD patients are more and more frequent users of the emergency department. There are several differences in cardiovascular function in these patients, as well as on examination. Its interpretation may be challenging and result in potentially fatal conclusions. The aim of this research was to assess the skills of paramedic students in assessing patients with LVAD. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The study was designed as a simulation study. The aim of this scenario was to provide a full primary survey of an unconscious, spontaneously breathing person with an LVAD pump implanted. Ten groups of paramedic students from Polish medical universities took part in this study. RESULTS: Four teams started chest compressions unnecessarily. Of them, only one had contacted LVAD local coordinator and discontinued after short instructions. Four teams completed the driveline and device check and six checked only the line without moving the controller. No major errors were noted in the field of airway assessment and management as well as assessment of consciousness, breathing, and circulation. CONCLUSIONS: More attention should be paid to educating paramedic students in LVAD therapy. Educators should focus mainly on differences in cardiovascular function and pay attention to complete perfusion assessment. Medical simulation seems to be a good tool for assessing difficult clinical cases rarely encountered in practice.","PeriodicalId":52339,"journal":{"name":"Disaster and Emergency Medicine Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Disaster and Emergency Medicine Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5603/demj.a2023.0015","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Health Professions","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Mechanical Circulation Systems are a promising therapy for patients with end-stage of heart failure. Left ventricular assist device (LVAD) enforces using of concomitant anticoagulant therapy. This may lead to severe complications. LVAD patients are more and more frequent users of the emergency department. There are several differences in cardiovascular function in these patients, as well as on examination. Its interpretation may be challenging and result in potentially fatal conclusions. The aim of this research was to assess the skills of paramedic students in assessing patients with LVAD. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The study was designed as a simulation study. The aim of this scenario was to provide a full primary survey of an unconscious, spontaneously breathing person with an LVAD pump implanted. Ten groups of paramedic students from Polish medical universities took part in this study. RESULTS: Four teams started chest compressions unnecessarily. Of them, only one had contacted LVAD local coordinator and discontinued after short instructions. Four teams completed the driveline and device check and six checked only the line without moving the controller. No major errors were noted in the field of airway assessment and management as well as assessment of consciousness, breathing, and circulation. CONCLUSIONS: More attention should be paid to educating paramedic students in LVAD therapy. Educators should focus mainly on differences in cardiovascular function and pay attention to complete perfusion assessment. Medical simulation seems to be a good tool for assessing difficult clinical cases rarely encountered in practice.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
护理学生需要更多的训练在左心室辅助装置-试点模拟研究
引言:机械循环系统是一种很有前途的治疗终末期心力衰竭的方法。左心室辅助装置(LVAD)强制使用联合抗凝治疗。这可能会导致严重的并发症。LVAD患者越来越频繁地使用急诊科。这些患者在心血管功能和检查方面存在一些差异。它的解释可能具有挑战性,并可能导致致命的结论。本研究的目的是评估护理学生评估LVAD患者的技能。材料和方法:本研究设计为模拟研究。该场景的目的是对植入LVAD泵的无意识、自主呼吸的人进行全面的初步调查。来自波兰医科大学的10组护理专业学生参与了这项研究。结果:四个小组开始了不必要的胸外按压。其中,只有一人联系了LVAD当地协调员,并在接到简短指示后停止了工作。四个小组完成了传动系统和设备检查,六个小组只检查了线路,没有移动控制器。在气道评估和管理以及意识、呼吸和循环评估领域没有发现重大错误。结论:在LVAD治疗方面,应更加重视护理专业学生的教育。教育工作者应主要关注心血管功能的差异,并注意完整的灌注评估。医学模拟似乎是评估实践中很少遇到的临床疑难病例的好工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Disaster and Emergency Medicine Journal
Disaster and Emergency Medicine Journal Medicine-Emergency Medicine
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
30
期刊最新文献
Navigating mortality prediction in severe malaria: risk stratification models from the emergency department of coastal India Evaluating the risk: Group A Streptococcus as a causative agent of streptococcal toxic shock syndrome and necrotizing fasciitis Reassessment of the underlying mechanisms that contribute to the neurological disorders linked to long-term COVID-19 Use of tourniquets for hemorrhage control in civilian and military prehospital settings: metabolic, hemodynamic, and anatomical complications derived from exposure time Ethical predictability of human resources in Iranian hospitals
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1