The planning of green infrastructure using a three-level approach

IF 0.1 0 ARCHITECTURE Landscape Architecture and Art Pub Date : 2022-12-30 DOI:10.22616/j.landarchart.2022.21.02
Daiga Skujāne, Aiga Spāģe
{"title":"The planning of green infrastructure using a three-level approach","authors":"Daiga Skujāne, Aiga Spāģe","doi":"10.22616/j.landarchart.2022.21.02","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In recent years, global research in spatial planning has focused on the sustainable development of green infrastructure (GI) in order to reduce the consequences of urbanization processes on the ecological, socio-economic and visual quality of the environment. Problems with stormwater management, floods, storms and global warming in general are just some of the reasons why GI planning has gained popularity. According to other current strategies (EU Biodiversity Strategy, EU GI strategy, Green Deal initiatives, etc.), GI plans, which include social, economic and ecological aspects, are being developed for territories of different scales. Until recently, green infrastructure was just an added value to real estate, but today it plays a completely different, much more important role. In Europe, the GI planning process has already begun, with several European countries developing GI plans in urban environment, different scales across country and even at national level.\nDepending on the scale chosen, the principles of GI planning differ. In European examples, GI is considered in large-scale regional landscapes, where the green network and connections are formed from natural areas, but at the urban scale, the creation of GI goes hand in hand with the creation of a green network in the city, connecting the largest green areas with each other (squares, parks, urban forests, etc.). However, in the scientific literature, the basic principles and the correlation of GI planning at different scales have not been widely studied and analyzed. Therefore, the purpose of the article is to define the main principles in the planning of GI in Latvia using a three-level approach. Each level corresponds to a specific scale of the territory, starting with the regional scale, moving to rural and urbanized areas and concluding with the site scale. Each lower level is subordinated to the highest, thus forming a single GI planning system. At each level, GI key planning principles and prerequisites to be considered are defined.\nThe town of Aizpute, its neighboring villages and rural areas in Latvia were chosen as a case study territory for the article. Article discusses the planning of GI in the context of three levels and also the different approaches of GI planning in the rural and urban landscape.","PeriodicalId":40393,"journal":{"name":"Landscape Architecture and Art","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Landscape Architecture and Art","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22616/j.landarchart.2022.21.02","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ARCHITECTURE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In recent years, global research in spatial planning has focused on the sustainable development of green infrastructure (GI) in order to reduce the consequences of urbanization processes on the ecological, socio-economic and visual quality of the environment. Problems with stormwater management, floods, storms and global warming in general are just some of the reasons why GI planning has gained popularity. According to other current strategies (EU Biodiversity Strategy, EU GI strategy, Green Deal initiatives, etc.), GI plans, which include social, economic and ecological aspects, are being developed for territories of different scales. Until recently, green infrastructure was just an added value to real estate, but today it plays a completely different, much more important role. In Europe, the GI planning process has already begun, with several European countries developing GI plans in urban environment, different scales across country and even at national level. Depending on the scale chosen, the principles of GI planning differ. In European examples, GI is considered in large-scale regional landscapes, where the green network and connections are formed from natural areas, but at the urban scale, the creation of GI goes hand in hand with the creation of a green network in the city, connecting the largest green areas with each other (squares, parks, urban forests, etc.). However, in the scientific literature, the basic principles and the correlation of GI planning at different scales have not been widely studied and analyzed. Therefore, the purpose of the article is to define the main principles in the planning of GI in Latvia using a three-level approach. Each level corresponds to a specific scale of the territory, starting with the regional scale, moving to rural and urbanized areas and concluding with the site scale. Each lower level is subordinated to the highest, thus forming a single GI planning system. At each level, GI key planning principles and prerequisites to be considered are defined. The town of Aizpute, its neighboring villages and rural areas in Latvia were chosen as a case study territory for the article. Article discusses the planning of GI in the context of three levels and also the different approaches of GI planning in the rural and urban landscape.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
采用三级方法规划绿色基础设施
近年来,全球空间规划研究的重点是绿色基础设施(GI)的可持续发展,以减少城市化进程对环境的生态、社会经济和视觉质量的影响。雨水管理、洪水、风暴和全球变暖等问题只是地理标志规划受到欢迎的部分原因。根据其他现有战略(欧盟生物多样性战略、欧盟地理标志战略、绿色协议倡议等),正在为不同规模的领土制定包括社会、经济和生态方面的地理标志计划。直到最近,绿色基础设施还只是房地产的附加值,但今天它扮演着完全不同的、重要得多的角色。在欧洲,地理标志规划进程已经开始,一些欧洲国家在城市环境、不同规模的国家甚至国家层面制定了地理标志规划。根据所选择的规模,地理标志规划的原则有所不同。在欧洲的例子中,地理标志是在大规模的区域景观中考虑的,其中绿色网络和连接是由自然区域形成的,但在城市尺度上,地理标志的创建与城市绿色网络的创建密切相关,将最大的绿地(广场,公园,城市森林等)相互连接起来。然而,在科学文献中,对不同尺度地理标志规划的基本原则及其相关性的研究和分析并不广泛。因此,本文的目的是使用三个层次的方法来定义拉脱维亚地理标志规划的主要原则。每一层都对应一个特定的领土尺度,从区域尺度开始,到农村和城市化地区,最后到场地尺度。每一个较低的层次都从属于最高的层次,从而形成一个单一的地理标志规划体系。在每个级别上,都定义了要考虑的GI关键规划原则和先决条件。Aizpute镇及其邻近的村庄和拉脱维亚的农村地区被选为本文的案例研究领域。本文从三个层面探讨了地理标志的规划,以及城乡地理标志规划的不同方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
25.00%
发文量
3
期刊介绍: Information not localized
期刊最新文献
Cardiogram of the Park: Quantitative Analysis of Walking Scenarios of Trakų Vokė Historic Park The importance of silhouette in the perception of the urban landscape. Saldus example Multicriteria assessment of landscape architecture projects: the sustainability perspective Public open space placemaking suitable for adolescents Malpils Manor: architecture, cultural and historical developments. Second half of the 18th century – first quarter of the 21st century
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1