Small and medium-sized enterprises and their use of organizational forms in Japan after World War II

IF 0.8 4区 管理学 Q1 HISTORY Management & Organizational History Pub Date : 2019-08-27 DOI:10.1080/17449359.2019.1659823
Takashi Shimizu
{"title":"Small and medium-sized enterprises and their use of organizational forms in Japan after World War II","authors":"Takashi Shimizu","doi":"10.1080/17449359.2019.1659823","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This study investigates how people recognize and use organizational forms in the process of economic development. In order to do this, I will focus on the recognition and use of the corporate form as well as the private limited liability company (PLLC) form in Japan after World War II (WWII). Before WWII, the corporate form was considered as an instrument for big businesses, while the PLLC was for small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs). After WWII, however, many SMEs started to use the corporate form, even though they could not fulfill all the legal obligations. Even though this situation was criticized as ‘abusive’ use of the corporate form, SMEs continued to use it, but the extent to which they preferred it to the PLLC form has changed over time. By referring to discussions of legal scholars as well as statistical data, I found that several different factors affected this phenomenon: the trustworthiness of corporations, the cost of using the corporate form, and its usefulness for the modernization of management.","PeriodicalId":45724,"journal":{"name":"Management & Organizational History","volume":"14 1","pages":"423 - 441"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2019-08-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/17449359.2019.1659823","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Management & Organizational History","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17449359.2019.1659823","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT This study investigates how people recognize and use organizational forms in the process of economic development. In order to do this, I will focus on the recognition and use of the corporate form as well as the private limited liability company (PLLC) form in Japan after World War II (WWII). Before WWII, the corporate form was considered as an instrument for big businesses, while the PLLC was for small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs). After WWII, however, many SMEs started to use the corporate form, even though they could not fulfill all the legal obligations. Even though this situation was criticized as ‘abusive’ use of the corporate form, SMEs continued to use it, but the extent to which they preferred it to the PLLC form has changed over time. By referring to discussions of legal scholars as well as statistical data, I found that several different factors affected this phenomenon: the trustworthiness of corporations, the cost of using the corporate form, and its usefulness for the modernization of management.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
第二次世界大战后日本中小企业及其组织形式的运用
摘要本研究调查了人们在经济发展过程中如何识别和使用组织形式。为了做到这一点,我将重点关注二战后日本对公司形式以及私人有限责任公司(PLLC)形式的认可和使用。在二战之前,公司形式被认为是大企业的工具,而PLLC是为中小型企业(SME)设计的。然而,二战后,许多中小企业开始使用公司形式,尽管它们无法履行所有的法律义务。尽管这种情况被批评为“滥用”公司形式,中小企业仍在继续使用,但随着时间的推移,他们更喜欢它而不是PLLC形式的程度已经发生了变化。通过参考法律学者的讨论和统计数据,我发现有几个不同的因素影响了这一现象:公司的可信度、使用公司形式的成本以及它对管理现代化的有用性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
16.70%
发文量
8
期刊介绍: Management & Organizational History (M&OH) is a quarterly, peer-reviewed journal that aims to publish high quality, original, academic research concerning historical approaches to the study of management, organizations and organizing. The journal addresses issues from all areas of management, organization studies, and related fields. The unifying theme of M&OH is its historical orientation. The journal is both empirical and theoretical. It seeks to advance innovative historical methods. It facilitates interdisciplinary dialogue, especially between business and management history and organization theory. The ethos of M&OH is reflective, ethical, imaginative, critical, inter-disciplinary, and international, as well as historical in orientation.
期刊最新文献
The history of entrepreneurship education in the United Kingdom: 1860-2020 Family entrepreneurs and their next generations, 1809–1945: educational pathways of business elite in Finland Who watches the watchdogs? Central bank board members and banking supervisors in Switzerland (1907–2008) Informing the ontologies of organizational histories: the critical conceptualization of events and actualization in organizing Who determined the rules of the game in the Spanish financial reforms, 1970-1990?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1