A Cognitive Bias for Zipfian Distributions? Uniform Distributions Become More Skewed via Cultural Transmission

IF 2.1 N/A LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS Journal of Language Evolution Pub Date : 2022-07-09 DOI:10.1093/jole/lzac005
Amir Shufaniya, Inbal Arnon
{"title":"A Cognitive Bias for Zipfian Distributions? Uniform Distributions Become More Skewed via Cultural Transmission","authors":"Amir Shufaniya, Inbal Arnon","doi":"10.1093/jole/lzac005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n There is growing evidence that cognitive biases play a role in shaping language structure. Here, we ask whether such biases could contribute to the propensity of Zipfian word-frequency distributions in language, one of the striking commonalities between languages. Recent theoretical accounts and experimental findings suggest that such distributions provide a facilitative environment for word learning and segmentation. However, it remains unclear whether the advantage found in the laboratory reflects prior linguistic experience with such distributions or a cognitive preference for them. To explore this, we used an iterated learning paradigm—which can be used to reveal weak individual biases that are amplified overtime—to see if learners change a uniform input distribution to make it more skewed via cultural transmission. In the first study, we show that speakers are biased to produce skewed word distributions in telling a novel story. In the second study, we ask if this bias leads to a shift from uniform distributions towards more skewed ones using an iterated learning design. We exposed the first learner to a story where six nonce words appeared equally often, and asked them to re-tell it. Their output served as input for the next learner, and so on for a chain of ten learners (or ‘generations’). Over time, word distributions became more skewed (as measured by lower levels of word entropy). The third study asked if the shift will be less pronounced when lexical access was made easier (by reminding participants of the novel word forms), but this did not have a significant effect on entropy reduction. These findings are consistent with a cognitive bias for skewed distributions that gets amplified over time and support the role of entropy minimization in the emergence of Zipfian distributions.","PeriodicalId":37118,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Language Evolution","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Language Evolution","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jole/lzac005","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"N/A","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

There is growing evidence that cognitive biases play a role in shaping language structure. Here, we ask whether such biases could contribute to the propensity of Zipfian word-frequency distributions in language, one of the striking commonalities between languages. Recent theoretical accounts and experimental findings suggest that such distributions provide a facilitative environment for word learning and segmentation. However, it remains unclear whether the advantage found in the laboratory reflects prior linguistic experience with such distributions or a cognitive preference for them. To explore this, we used an iterated learning paradigm—which can be used to reveal weak individual biases that are amplified overtime—to see if learners change a uniform input distribution to make it more skewed via cultural transmission. In the first study, we show that speakers are biased to produce skewed word distributions in telling a novel story. In the second study, we ask if this bias leads to a shift from uniform distributions towards more skewed ones using an iterated learning design. We exposed the first learner to a story where six nonce words appeared equally often, and asked them to re-tell it. Their output served as input for the next learner, and so on for a chain of ten learners (or ‘generations’). Over time, word distributions became more skewed (as measured by lower levels of word entropy). The third study asked if the shift will be less pronounced when lexical access was made easier (by reminding participants of the novel word forms), but this did not have a significant effect on entropy reduction. These findings are consistent with a cognitive bias for skewed distributions that gets amplified over time and support the role of entropy minimization in the emergence of Zipfian distributions.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Zipfian分布的认知偏差?文化传播使均匀分布更加倾斜
越来越多的证据表明,认知偏见在语言结构的形成中起着重要作用。在这里,我们想知道这些偏差是否会导致语言中Zipfian词频分布的倾向,这是语言之间显著的共性之一。最近的理论研究和实验结果表明,这种分布为单词学习和分词提供了一个便利的环境。然而,尚不清楚在实验室中发现的优势是否反映了先前的语言经验或对它们的认知偏好。为了探索这一点,我们使用了一种迭代学习范式——它可以用来揭示随着时间的推移而被放大的微弱个人偏见——来观察学习者是否通过文化传播改变了统一的输入分布,使其更加偏斜。在第一项研究中,我们发现说话者在讲述小说故事时倾向于产生扭曲的单词分布。在第二项研究中,我们询问这种偏差是否会导致使用迭代学习设计从均匀分布转向更倾斜的分布。我们让第一个学习者听了一个故事,故事中六个新单词出现的频率相同,然后让他们复述一遍。他们的输出作为下一个学习者的输入,以此类推,10个学习者(或“代”)。随着时间的推移,单词分布变得更加倾斜(通过较低水平的单词熵来衡量)。第三项研究询问,当词汇获取变得更容易时(通过提醒参与者新的单词形式),这种转变是否会不那么明显,但这对熵减少没有显著影响。这些发现与随着时间的推移而被放大的偏斜分布的认知偏差一致,并支持熵最小化在Zipfian分布出现中的作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Language Evolution
Journal of Language Evolution Social Sciences-Linguistics and Language
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
7.70%
发文量
8
期刊最新文献
Derivational morphology and suffixing bias on linguistic and nonlinguistic material Bayesian phylogenetic analysis of pitch-accent systems based on accentual class merger: a new method applied to Japanese dialects The evolution of evolutionary linguistics Evolutionary pathways of complexity in gender systems Correction to: The scientometric landscape of Evolang: A comprehensive database of the Evolang conference
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1