The impact of cultural variability on brand stereotype, emotion and purchase intention

IF 2.7 Q2 BUSINESS Journal of Consumer Marketing Pub Date : 2022-12-15 DOI:10.1108/jcm-01-2022-5121
Alexander Jakubanecs, M. Supphellen, James G. Helgeson, H. Haugen, Njål Sivertstøl
{"title":"The impact of cultural variability on brand stereotype, emotion and purchase intention","authors":"Alexander Jakubanecs, M. Supphellen, James G. Helgeson, H. Haugen, Njål Sivertstøl","doi":"10.1108/jcm-01-2022-5121","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nThis study aims to focus on an interplay of brand stereotypes (Brands as Intentional Agents Framework [BIAF]) with an aspect of culture and its impact on behavioral intentions in an individualist culture (Norway) and a collectivist culture (Thailand).\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nThis study incorporates a survey conducted in two cultures (Norway: N = 177 and Thailand: N = 288).\n\n\nFindings\nIn both cultures, competence had a stronger effect on purchase intentions toward a brand than warmth. There was a stronger effect on brand purchase intentions of competence found for an individualist versus a collectivist culture, and we found a stronger effect of warmth on purchase intentions in a collectivist versus an individualist culture. The direct joint effect of warmth and competence on purchase intentions was brand-specific in Norway. Admiration mediated this joint effect in the collectivist but not in the individualist culture.\n\n\nResearch limitations/implications\nThis study’s results point to cross-cultural variability of some of the effects of brand perceptions on behavioral intentions.\n\n\nPractical implications\nThese findings suggest that international brand managers should consider both the cultural universality and the cultural variability of BIAF.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nDespite extensive research on BIAF, studies on brand perceptions from the cross-cultural perspective are few. This investigation sheds some light on the differential effects of the framework across a collectivist and an individualist culture.\n","PeriodicalId":35923,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Consumer Marketing","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Consumer Marketing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/jcm-01-2022-5121","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Purpose This study aims to focus on an interplay of brand stereotypes (Brands as Intentional Agents Framework [BIAF]) with an aspect of culture and its impact on behavioral intentions in an individualist culture (Norway) and a collectivist culture (Thailand). Design/methodology/approach This study incorporates a survey conducted in two cultures (Norway: N = 177 and Thailand: N = 288). Findings In both cultures, competence had a stronger effect on purchase intentions toward a brand than warmth. There was a stronger effect on brand purchase intentions of competence found for an individualist versus a collectivist culture, and we found a stronger effect of warmth on purchase intentions in a collectivist versus an individualist culture. The direct joint effect of warmth and competence on purchase intentions was brand-specific in Norway. Admiration mediated this joint effect in the collectivist but not in the individualist culture. Research limitations/implications This study’s results point to cross-cultural variability of some of the effects of brand perceptions on behavioral intentions. Practical implications These findings suggest that international brand managers should consider both the cultural universality and the cultural variability of BIAF. Originality/value Despite extensive research on BIAF, studies on brand perceptions from the cross-cultural perspective are few. This investigation sheds some light on the differential effects of the framework across a collectivist and an individualist culture.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
文化差异对品牌刻板印象、情感和购买意愿的影响
本研究旨在关注品牌刻板印象(品牌作为意向代理人框架[BIAF])与文化的相互作用及其对个人主义文化(挪威)和集体主义文化(泰国)的行为意图的影响。设计/方法/方法本研究结合了在两种文化中进行的调查(挪威:N = 177,泰国:N = 288)。研究发现,在这两种文化中,能力对品牌购买意愿的影响都大于热情。在个人主义文化背景下,能力对品牌购买意愿的影响比集体主义文化背景下更强;在集体主义文化背景下,热情对品牌购买意愿的影响比个人主义文化背景下更强。在挪威,热情和能力对购买意愿的直接联合效应具有品牌特异性。钦佩在集体主义文化中介导了这种联合效应,但在个人主义文化中没有。研究局限/启示本研究的结果指出,品牌认知对行为意图的某些影响存在跨文化差异。这些研究结果表明,国际品牌管理者应该同时考虑国际品牌营销的文化普遍性和文化变异性。尽管对品牌认知的研究非常广泛,但从跨文化角度对品牌认知的研究却很少。这项调查揭示了在集体主义和个人主义文化中,框架的不同影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Consumer Marketing
Journal of Consumer Marketing Business, Management and Accounting-Business and International Management
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
7.10%
发文量
68
期刊介绍: ■Consumer behaviour ■Customer policy and service ■Practical case studies to illustrate concepts ■The latest thinking and research in marketing planning ■The marketing of services worldwide
期刊最新文献
Generation Z’s intention to use digital fashion items in the Metaverse Conspicuous compensatory consumption: scale development and initial validation The adoption of smart services: do privacy concerns, trust in benevolence and usage experience matter? In smartness we trust: consumer experience, smart device personalization and privacy balance Examining process mechanism of celebrity attributes on brand advocacy
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1