{"title":"Competitive balance and demand for European men's football: a review of the literature","authors":"Tsjalle van der Burg","doi":"10.1080/23750472.2023.2206815","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Research question: In European men ’ s club football, competitive balance is decreasing. Review articles have concluded that the empirical studies do not provide a unanimous answer to the question whether this decrease leads to lower utility for the fans. This paper investigates whether the conclusion of the reviews is (still) correct. Research methods: Qualitative analysis is applied to get a better interpretation of the results of the empirical studies. Results and fi ndings: There are three types of uncertainty of outcome: short-term, seasonal, and long-term, with possible di ff erent dimensions within one type. A possible interpretation of the literature is the following: a decrease in one or two types of uncertainty of outcome, or a certain dimension, can lead to serious reductions in welfare, while the conclusion may be di ff erent for other types or dimensions. Several studies suggest that a decrease in (a certain type of) competitive balance has no e ff ect on welfare, or just a small e ff ect, if the competitive balance remains above some minimum level whereas once the competitive balance is below this level, further decreases in it result in serious welfare reductions. Taking these and other points into account, the review concludes that it is highly plausible that the present level of competitive balance is below the welfare-maximising level in most competitions at least, and any further decrease in it will seriously reduce welfare. Implications: Policies that improve competitive balance will plausibly also improve welfare. Research contribution: Compared to other review studies, this paper pays more attention to the reasons why di ff erent empirical studies get di ff erent results, which enables a less ambiguous conclusion.","PeriodicalId":45947,"journal":{"name":"Managing Sport and Leisure","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Managing Sport and Leisure","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/23750472.2023.2206815","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Research question: In European men ’ s club football, competitive balance is decreasing. Review articles have concluded that the empirical studies do not provide a unanimous answer to the question whether this decrease leads to lower utility for the fans. This paper investigates whether the conclusion of the reviews is (still) correct. Research methods: Qualitative analysis is applied to get a better interpretation of the results of the empirical studies. Results and fi ndings: There are three types of uncertainty of outcome: short-term, seasonal, and long-term, with possible di ff erent dimensions within one type. A possible interpretation of the literature is the following: a decrease in one or two types of uncertainty of outcome, or a certain dimension, can lead to serious reductions in welfare, while the conclusion may be di ff erent for other types or dimensions. Several studies suggest that a decrease in (a certain type of) competitive balance has no e ff ect on welfare, or just a small e ff ect, if the competitive balance remains above some minimum level whereas once the competitive balance is below this level, further decreases in it result in serious welfare reductions. Taking these and other points into account, the review concludes that it is highly plausible that the present level of competitive balance is below the welfare-maximising level in most competitions at least, and any further decrease in it will seriously reduce welfare. Implications: Policies that improve competitive balance will plausibly also improve welfare. Research contribution: Compared to other review studies, this paper pays more attention to the reasons why di ff erent empirical studies get di ff erent results, which enables a less ambiguous conclusion.
期刊介绍:
Managing Sport and Leisure is a refereed journal that publishes high quality research articles to inform and stimulate discussions relevant to sport and leisure management globally. The journal is committed to publishing research that advances understanding of the practice of sport and leisure management in the public, voluntary and commercial sectors, internationally. It will appeal to anyone with a serious interest in contemporary sport and leisure management issues, including academics, managers, consultants, politicians and students. One of the key objectives of the journal is to provide a high level forum for communication between academics and practitioners of sport and leisure. Therefore Managing Sport and Leisure aims to be contemporary, integrated and, most importantly, relevant to practitioner training. Contributions are welcome and expected from both academics and practitioners throughout the international sport and leisure management community. In addition, the journal welcomes submissions from those investigating new and innovative areas of research and practice in sport and leisure management.