Setting priorities in health: The managers' perspectives versus general public

N. Araújo, Ana Maria Reis, A. Borges, J. Neves, Á. Rosa
{"title":"Setting priorities in health: The managers' perspectives versus general public","authors":"N. Araújo, Ana Maria Reis, A. Borges, J. Neves, Á. Rosa","doi":"10.1177/20534345231191037","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Decision-makers are constantly confronted with the need of balancing limited resources while establishing rationing criteria in health care system. However, there is an emerging trend in involving citizens in rationing debates as mechanism to assuring legitimacy in the decision-making process. This paper aims to explore citizens’ opinions on priority setting in health care access in comparison with the perspectives of managers. An online questionnaire was used to collect the data. A logistic regression was applied to evaluate factors that shape the prioritisation of groups in access to health care services. The collected data comprehends 400 individuals, aged 18 years old and over living in continental Portugal. The study results reveal that managers and the general public, in the context of limited resources, both agree with the need to prioritise some groups over others in access to health care services. The priority groups would include the elderly, children, and people with chronic conditions. The most outstanding finding is that managers prefer children as their first priority group against the general public who has considered as top priority the elder ones. This study identified which stakeholders are prone to be included in decision-making processes for effective priority-setting models in the health care systems and evaluated their preferences.","PeriodicalId":43751,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Care Coordination","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Care Coordination","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/20534345231191037","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Decision-makers are constantly confronted with the need of balancing limited resources while establishing rationing criteria in health care system. However, there is an emerging trend in involving citizens in rationing debates as mechanism to assuring legitimacy in the decision-making process. This paper aims to explore citizens’ opinions on priority setting in health care access in comparison with the perspectives of managers. An online questionnaire was used to collect the data. A logistic regression was applied to evaluate factors that shape the prioritisation of groups in access to health care services. The collected data comprehends 400 individuals, aged 18 years old and over living in continental Portugal. The study results reveal that managers and the general public, in the context of limited resources, both agree with the need to prioritise some groups over others in access to health care services. The priority groups would include the elderly, children, and people with chronic conditions. The most outstanding finding is that managers prefer children as their first priority group against the general public who has considered as top priority the elder ones. This study identified which stakeholders are prone to be included in decision-making processes for effective priority-setting models in the health care systems and evaluated their preferences.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
确定卫生方面的优先事项:管理者的观点与公众的观点
决策者在建立医疗保健系统配给标准的同时,不断面临着平衡有限资源的需求。然而,一种新的趋势是,让公民参与配给辩论,作为确保决策过程合法性的机制。本文旨在与管理者的观点进行比较,探讨公民对医疗服务优先权设置的看法。使用在线问卷来收集数据。应用逻辑回归来评估影响群体获得医疗保健服务优先级的因素。收集的数据包括400名居住在葡萄牙大陆的18岁及以上的人。研究结果显示,在资源有限的情况下,管理人员和公众都同意有必要在获得医疗服务方面优先考虑某些群体。优先人群将包括老年人、儿童和慢性病患者。最突出的发现是,管理者更喜欢将儿童作为他们的第一优先群体,而不是将老年人视为最优先群体的普通公众。这项研究确定了哪些利益相关者容易被纳入医疗保健系统中有效的优先级设定模型的决策过程,并评估了他们的偏好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
14.30%
发文量
15
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Care Coordination (formerly published as the International Journal of Care Pathways) provides an international forum for the latest scientific research in care coordination. The Journal publishes peer-reviewed original articles which describe basic research to a multidisciplinary field as well as other broader approaches and strategies hypothesized to improve care coordination. The Journal offers insightful overviews and reflections on innovation, underlying issues, and thought provoking opinion pieces in related fields. Articles from multidisciplinary fields are welcomed from leading health care academics and policy-makers. Published articles types include original research, reviews, guidelines papers, book reviews, and news items.
期刊最新文献
Primary care follow-up among children born with neonatal abstinence syndrome in a rural region in the United States Effectiveness of early care information transfer among home-dwelling frail elderly patients in Japan: A cluster randomized trial Nurses’ roles, views and knowledge regarding vaccines and vaccination: A pan-European survey Without unpaid carers the system would collapse Supporting rural health services through regional networks: Observations of a formalized model
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1