Equal Wage for Equal Work? Gender Wage Equality in Diverse Labour Market Contexts

IF 0.4 4区 社会学 Q4 SOCIOLOGY Sociologicky Casopis-Czech Sociological Review Pub Date : 2022-11-11 DOI:10.13060/csr.2022.036
A. Křížková, Kristýna Pospíšilová
{"title":"Equal Wage for Equal Work? Gender Wage Equality in Diverse Labour Market Contexts","authors":"A. Křížková, Kristýna Pospíšilová","doi":"10.13060/csr.2022.036","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":": Although international comparisons point to the gender pay gap (GPG) as a significant problem in the Czech labour market, until recently the GPG has not been the subject of deeper research or political attention. Using linked employer– employee data, the article answers the question of whether men and women were paid an equal wage for equal work in 2005–2020 and what part of the total GPG is caused by the segregation of women and men into different occupations, workplaces, and jobs. We also pose these questions separately for the public and private spheres, for selected industries, and for workplaces according to size. Throughout the monitored period, the GPG for equal work is around 10% and another roughly one-half of total GPG is caused by gender segregation. There has been a slight decrease since 2018, especially in workplaces with more than 5000 employees, where, however, the significance of women’s segregation into lower-paid positions is growing. The research confirmed that in more regulated, and therefore more transparent, contexts, such as the public sphere and in large workplaces (but also in small companies with up to 50 employees), the GPG for equal work is smaller than elsewhere. The results point to the need to systematically monitor the GPG and increase the transparency of remuneration systems in the workplace. In connection with the GPG, it will also be necessary to analyse the organisational processes that lead to women’s segregation into occupations, workplaces, and jobs that have lower wages, as well as the growing precarity of the Czech labour market.","PeriodicalId":45665,"journal":{"name":"Sociologicky Casopis-Czech Sociological Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sociologicky Casopis-Czech Sociological Review","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.13060/csr.2022.036","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SOCIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

: Although international comparisons point to the gender pay gap (GPG) as a significant problem in the Czech labour market, until recently the GPG has not been the subject of deeper research or political attention. Using linked employer– employee data, the article answers the question of whether men and women were paid an equal wage for equal work in 2005–2020 and what part of the total GPG is caused by the segregation of women and men into different occupations, workplaces, and jobs. We also pose these questions separately for the public and private spheres, for selected industries, and for workplaces according to size. Throughout the monitored period, the GPG for equal work is around 10% and another roughly one-half of total GPG is caused by gender segregation. There has been a slight decrease since 2018, especially in workplaces with more than 5000 employees, where, however, the significance of women’s segregation into lower-paid positions is growing. The research confirmed that in more regulated, and therefore more transparent, contexts, such as the public sphere and in large workplaces (but also in small companies with up to 50 employees), the GPG for equal work is smaller than elsewhere. The results point to the need to systematically monitor the GPG and increase the transparency of remuneration systems in the workplace. In connection with the GPG, it will also be necessary to analyse the organisational processes that lead to women’s segregation into occupations, workplaces, and jobs that have lower wages, as well as the growing precarity of the Czech labour market.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
同工同酬?不同劳动力市场背景下的性别工资平等
:尽管国际比较表明性别薪酬差距是捷克劳动力市场的一个重大问题,但直到最近,性别薪酬差距还没有成为深入研究或政治关注的主题。文章利用雇主-雇员的关联数据,回答了2005-2020年男性和女性是否因同工同酬而获得同等工资的问题,以及女性和男性被隔离到不同的职业、工作场所和工作中导致的GPG总额的哪一部分。我们还分别针对公共和私人领域、选定的行业以及根据规模的工作场所提出了这些问题。在整个监测期内,平等工作的GPG约为10%,另外约一半的GPG是由性别隔离引起的。自2018年以来,这一数字略有下降,尤其是在员工人数超过5000人的工作场所,然而,女性被隔离到低薪职位的重要性越来越大。研究证实,在更受监管、因此更透明的环境中,如公共领域和大型工作场所(但也包括员工人数最多为50人的小公司),平等工作的GPG比其他地方更小。研究结果表明,有必要系统地监测GPG,并提高工作场所薪酬制度的透明度。关于GPG,还需要分析导致妇女被隔离到职业、工作场所和工资较低的工作中的组织过程,以及捷克劳动力市场日益不稳定的情况。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
25.00%
发文量
19
期刊介绍: Sociologický časopis je recenzovaný vědecký časopis publikující původní příspěvky k poznání společnosti od českých i zahraničních autorů. Vychází od roku 1965. Časopis přináší stati zabývající se otázkami teoretické sociologie, články zkoumající transformační jevy a sociální procesy probíhající v postkomunistických společnostech, přehledové články zpracovávající vývoj v široké paletě oborů sociologie a příbuzných sociálních věd, informace ze sociologických výzkumů.
期刊最新文献
Petr Gibas a kol.: Bydlení mladých v době krize Michal Kaplánek (ed.): Volný čas dětí staršího školního věku Martin Potůček: Anatomie komunismu: Skutečný příběh jedné rodiny Between Politicisation and Depoliticisation: Restitution of Church Property in Czech Republic What Is Early Childhood Education and Care For? How ECEC for Children up to the Age of Three Is (Not) Discussed in the Czech Republic
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1