The Laurentian Neoproterozoic Glacial Interval: reappraising the extent and timing of glaciation

IF 1.7 4区 地球科学 Q2 Earth and Planetary Sciences Austrian Journal of Earth Sciences Pub Date : 2020-01-01 DOI:10.17738/ajes.2020.0004
D. L. Le Heron, N. Eyles, M. Busfield
{"title":"The Laurentian Neoproterozoic Glacial Interval: reappraising the extent and timing of glaciation","authors":"D. L. Le Heron, N. Eyles, M. Busfield","doi":"10.17738/ajes.2020.0004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract One of the major issues in Neoproterozoic geology is the extent to which glaciations in the Cryogenian and Ediacaran periods were global in extent and synchronous or regional in extent and diachronous. A similarly outstanding concern is determining whether deposits are truly glacial, as opposed to gravitationally initiated mass flow deposits in the context of a rifting Rodinia supercontinent. In this paper, we present 115 publically available, quality-filtered chronostratigraphic constraints on the age and duration of Neoproterozoic glacial successions, and compare their palaeocontinental distribution. Depositional ages from North America (Laurentia) clearly support the idea of a substantial glacial epoch between about 720-660 Ma on this palaeocontinent but paradoxically, the majority of Australian glacial strata plot outside the previously proposed global time band for the eponymous Sturtian glaciation, with new dates from China also plotting in a time window previously thought to be an interglacial. For the early Cryogenian, the data permit either a short, sharp 2.4 Ma long global glaciation, or diachronous shifting of ice centres across the Rodinia palaeocontinent, implying regional rather than global ice covers and asynchronous glacial cycles. Thus, based on careful consideration of age constraints, we suggest that strata deposited in the ca. 720-660 Ma window in North America are better described as belonging to a Laurentian Neoproterozoic Glacial Interval (LNGI), given that use of the term Sturtian for a major Neoproterozoic glacial epoch can clearly no longer be justified. This finding is of fundamental importance for reconstructing the Neoproterozoic climate system because chronological constraints do not support the concept of a synchronous panglacial Snowball Earth. Diachroneity of the glacial record reflects underlying palaeotectonic and palaeogeographic controls on the timing of glaciation resulting from the progressive breakup of the Rodinian supercontinent.","PeriodicalId":49319,"journal":{"name":"Austrian Journal of Earth Sciences","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"11","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Austrian Journal of Earth Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17738/ajes.2020.0004","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Earth and Planetary Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11

Abstract

Abstract One of the major issues in Neoproterozoic geology is the extent to which glaciations in the Cryogenian and Ediacaran periods were global in extent and synchronous or regional in extent and diachronous. A similarly outstanding concern is determining whether deposits are truly glacial, as opposed to gravitationally initiated mass flow deposits in the context of a rifting Rodinia supercontinent. In this paper, we present 115 publically available, quality-filtered chronostratigraphic constraints on the age and duration of Neoproterozoic glacial successions, and compare their palaeocontinental distribution. Depositional ages from North America (Laurentia) clearly support the idea of a substantial glacial epoch between about 720-660 Ma on this palaeocontinent but paradoxically, the majority of Australian glacial strata plot outside the previously proposed global time band for the eponymous Sturtian glaciation, with new dates from China also plotting in a time window previously thought to be an interglacial. For the early Cryogenian, the data permit either a short, sharp 2.4 Ma long global glaciation, or diachronous shifting of ice centres across the Rodinia palaeocontinent, implying regional rather than global ice covers and asynchronous glacial cycles. Thus, based on careful consideration of age constraints, we suggest that strata deposited in the ca. 720-660 Ma window in North America are better described as belonging to a Laurentian Neoproterozoic Glacial Interval (LNGI), given that use of the term Sturtian for a major Neoproterozoic glacial epoch can clearly no longer be justified. This finding is of fundamental importance for reconstructing the Neoproterozoic climate system because chronological constraints do not support the concept of a synchronous panglacial Snowball Earth. Diachroneity of the glacial record reflects underlying palaeotectonic and palaeogeographic controls on the timing of glaciation resulting from the progressive breakup of the Rodinian supercontinent.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
劳伦纪新元古代冰期:重新评价冰川作用的范围和时间
摘要新元古代地质学的主要问题之一是冰川期和埃迪卡拉期的冰川作用在多大程度上是全球性的,在多大程度上是同步的,在多大程度上是区域性的和历时的。一个同样突出的问题是确定沉积物是否真的是冰川沉积,而不是在罗丁尼亚超大陆裂谷的背景下由重力引发的质量流沉积。在本文中,我们提供了115个公开的、经过质量过滤的关于新元古代冰川序列年龄和持续时间的年代地层约束,并比较了它们的古大陆分布。来自北美(Laurentia)的沉积年龄清楚地支持了这个古大陆上大约在720-660 Ma之间的一个重要冰川期的观点,但矛盾的是,大多数澳大利亚冰川地层在之前提出的同名的斯图亚特冰川的全球时间范围之外,来自中国的新日期也在之前被认为是间冰期的时间窗口中绘制。对于早期的低温世,这些数据表明,要么是短暂而剧烈的2.4 Ma长的全球冰期,要么是罗迪尼亚古大陆上冰中心的历时转移,这意味着区域性而非全球性的冰盖和不同步的冰川旋回。因此,在仔细考虑年龄限制的基础上,我们认为,在北美约720-660 Ma窗口沉积的地层更适合被描述为属于劳伦纪新元古代冰期(LNGI),因为使用“斯图特纪”一词来表示新元古代冰期显然已不再合理。这一发现对于重建新元古代气候系统具有重要意义,因为时间限制不支持同步冰期雪球地球的概念。冰川记录的历时性反映了下伏的古构造和古地理对罗丁超大陆逐渐分裂所导致的冰川时代的控制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Austrian Journal of Earth Sciences
Austrian Journal of Earth Sciences Earth and Planetary Sciences-Paleontology
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: AUSTRIAN JOURNAL OF EARTH SCIENCES is the official journal of the Austrian Geological, Mineralogical and Palaeontological Societies, hosted by a country that is famous for its spectacular mountains that are the birthplace for many geological and mineralogical concepts in modern Earth science. AUSTRIAN JOURNAL OF EARTH SCIENCE focuses on all aspects relevant to the geosciences of the Alps, Bohemian Massif and surrounding areas. Contributions on other regions are welcome if they embed their findings into a conceptual framework that relates the contribution to Alpine-type orogens and Alpine regions in general, and are thus relevant to an international audience. Contributions are subject to peer review and editorial control according to SCI guidelines to ensure that the required standard of scientific excellence is maintained.
期刊最新文献
The temporal evolution of seismicity and variability of b-values along the Vienna Basin Transfer Fault System The role of the proto-Alpine Cenerian Orogen in the Avalonian- Cadomian belt Geoarchaeological remote sensing prospection of Miocene limestone quarries in the hinterland of Roman Carnuntum and Vindobona (Vienna Basin, Austria) The Lower - Middle Miocene transition (Karpatian – Badenian) in the Krems Embayment (Central Paratethys, Lower Austria): a multistrati-graphic approach and the role of the Diendorf-Boskovice Fault System. Organic geochemistry and petrography of Miocene ombrotrophic coals in the tropical Asem-Asem Basin (Kalimantan, Indonesia): Comparison to coeval subtropical coals in the Eastern Alps
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1