Persistent barriers to achieving quality neonatal care in low-resource settings: perspectives from a unique panel of frontline neonatal health experts

Eshkeerat Kaur, M. Heys, C. Crehan, F. Fitzgerald, Msandeni Chiume, E. Chirwa, E. Wilson, M. Evans
{"title":"Persistent barriers to achieving quality neonatal care in low-resource settings: perspectives from a unique panel of frontline neonatal health experts","authors":"Eshkeerat Kaur, M. Heys, C. Crehan, F. Fitzgerald, Msandeni Chiume, E. Chirwa, E. Wilson, M. Evans","doi":"10.29392/001c.72089","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Despite increasing rates of facility-based deliveries, neonatal mortality rates remain persistently high in low-resource settings (LRS). This has catalysed international focus on understanding and enabling quality newborn care. We aimed to understand persistent barriers to Quality of Care (QoC) and to identify quality improvement priorities from the perspective of a panel of neonatal experts with first-hand experience of delivering newborn care in low-resource settings (LRS). We conducted 13 semi-structured interviews with neonatal health experts via Skype. All interviews were recorded and transcribed verbatim. We adopted an inductive thematic analytical approach. Ethical approvals were not required. Twenty-two experts were invited to participate, of whom 16 responded and 13 agreed to take part (five neonatologists, six paediatricians and two advanced neonatal nurse practitioners). Participants had a mean of 13 (±7 SD) years working in LRS. Lack of physical resources including basic equipment and infrastructure such as running water, combined with limited human resources, education and specialist neonatal training were cited as key barriers to delivering quality care. In addition, weak leadership at the community, local and national level were thought to hinder progress. Poor communication within clinical teams, limited documentation and lack of standardised and locally appropriate guidelines were also identified as challenges. Digital technologies were perceived to have potential for data capture and enabling standardised care. However, some highlighted that unreliable internet access and possible stigma may hinder implementation. With less than 10 years to reach the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), it is critical to ensure access to quality care for all sick and vulnerable newborns admitted to health facilities. Clinical leaders in low resource settings need to be empowered to define local agendas and advocate for critical resources in order to close the gap between local and global quality of care priorities.","PeriodicalId":73759,"journal":{"name":"Journal of global health reports","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of global health reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29392/001c.72089","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Despite increasing rates of facility-based deliveries, neonatal mortality rates remain persistently high in low-resource settings (LRS). This has catalysed international focus on understanding and enabling quality newborn care. We aimed to understand persistent barriers to Quality of Care (QoC) and to identify quality improvement priorities from the perspective of a panel of neonatal experts with first-hand experience of delivering newborn care in low-resource settings (LRS). We conducted 13 semi-structured interviews with neonatal health experts via Skype. All interviews were recorded and transcribed verbatim. We adopted an inductive thematic analytical approach. Ethical approvals were not required. Twenty-two experts were invited to participate, of whom 16 responded and 13 agreed to take part (five neonatologists, six paediatricians and two advanced neonatal nurse practitioners). Participants had a mean of 13 (±7 SD) years working in LRS. Lack of physical resources including basic equipment and infrastructure such as running water, combined with limited human resources, education and specialist neonatal training were cited as key barriers to delivering quality care. In addition, weak leadership at the community, local and national level were thought to hinder progress. Poor communication within clinical teams, limited documentation and lack of standardised and locally appropriate guidelines were also identified as challenges. Digital technologies were perceived to have potential for data capture and enabling standardised care. However, some highlighted that unreliable internet access and possible stigma may hinder implementation. With less than 10 years to reach the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), it is critical to ensure access to quality care for all sick and vulnerable newborns admitted to health facilities. Clinical leaders in low resource settings need to be empowered to define local agendas and advocate for critical resources in order to close the gap between local and global quality of care priorities.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在低资源环境中实现高质量新生儿护理的持续障碍:来自一线新生儿健康专家独特小组的观点
尽管在医院分娩的比率在增加,但在资源匮乏地区,新生儿死亡率仍然居高不下。这促使国际社会关注理解和实现高质量的新生儿护理。我们旨在了解护理质量(QoC)的持续障碍,并从具有在低资源环境(LRS)提供新生儿护理的第一手经验的新生儿专家小组的角度确定质量改进的优先事项。我们通过Skype与新生儿健康专家进行了13次半结构化访谈。所有的采访都被逐字记录下来。我们采用了归纳的主题分析方法。不需要伦理审批。邀请了22位专家参加,其中16位做出回应,13位同意参加(5名新生儿专家、6名儿科医生和2名高级新生儿执业护士)。参与者在LRS工作的平均时间为13(±7 SD)年。缺乏物质资源,包括自来水等基本设备和基础设施,加上人力资源、教育和新生儿专科培训有限,被认为是提供高质量护理的主要障碍。此外,社区、地方和国家各级的领导薄弱被认为阻碍了进展。临床小组内部沟通不良、文件有限以及缺乏标准化和适合当地的指导方针也被确定为挑战。数字技术被认为具有数据捕获和实现标准化护理的潜力。然而,一些人强调,不可靠的互联网接入和可能的耻辱可能会阻碍实施。距离实现可持续发展目标还有不到10年的时间,因此,确保所有入住卫生机构的患病和弱势新生儿都能获得优质护理至关重要。资源匮乏地区的临床领导者需要获得权力,以确定当地议程并倡导关键资源,以缩小地方和全球护理质量优先事项之间的差距。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊最新文献
Implementation of Nigeria’s surgical plan: leveraging media engagement for cleft lip and palate to drive advocacy for access to surgical healthcare Digital health interventions in primary care in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic scoping review protocol Developing conceptual framework and methodological considerations in community-supported chronic disease management Using spirometry for screening and diagnosis of chronic respiratory diseases in primary health care: findings from a community health project in rural India Maternal health in cities: analysis of institutional maternal mortality and health system bottlenecks in Kampala City Uganda, 2016-2021
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1