The effects of a self-management program based on 5 A`s model on the quality of life and self-efficacy in the myocardial infarction patients.

Q3 Medicine Przeglad epidemiologiczny Pub Date : 2022-05-10 DOI:10.32394/pe.75.52
Siamak Bahrami Aloghareh, Shahriar Salehi Tali, A. Hasanpour Dehkordi, Hanifeh Gangi, M. Sedehi
{"title":"The effects of a self-management program based on 5 A`s model on the quality of life and self-efficacy in the myocardial infarction patients.","authors":"Siamak Bahrami Aloghareh, Shahriar Salehi Tali, A. Hasanpour Dehkordi, Hanifeh Gangi, M. Sedehi","doi":"10.32394/pe.75.52","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES\nThe myocardial infarction is the most severe manifestation of coronary artery disease. The promotion of self-efficacy in these patients can be effective in the improvement of their quality of life. The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of a self-management program based on 5 A`s model on the quality of life and self-efficacy of the patients with myocardial infarction.\n\n\nMETHODS\nThe current study was a clinical trial that was conducted in Ayatollah Kashani and Hajar hospitals in Shahr-e Kord (Iran) with the participation of 96 patients with myocardial infarction. The research units were blocked randomly into two 48-patient intervention and control groups. The training content was provided to the intervention group in five stages and they were asked to implement in three months. The demographic information questionnaire, the Ferrans and Powers Quality of Life questionnaire, and Sullivan Self-Efficacy questionnaire were the data collection instruments. The mean scores of pre and post-intervention were compared by the use of SPSS, version 16, software, paired t-test, single t-test, chi-square, and Fisher's Exact Test.\n\n\nFINDINGS\nThe results showed that the mean squares of quality of life and self-efficacy in pre and postintervention had a significant difference and the intervention group had a higher quality of life and self-efficacy levels compared to the control group (P<0.001).\n\n\nCONCLUSION\nAccording to the results of the study, it is suggested to use this model for empowerment and caring of patients besides the medicinal treatments, so that it would not lead to inability, reduction about the medical centers, frequent hospitalization, and ultimately, reduction in medical costs, and promotion of the society's health.","PeriodicalId":20777,"journal":{"name":"Przeglad epidemiologiczny","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Przeglad epidemiologiczny","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32394/pe.75.52","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES The myocardial infarction is the most severe manifestation of coronary artery disease. The promotion of self-efficacy in these patients can be effective in the improvement of their quality of life. The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of a self-management program based on 5 A`s model on the quality of life and self-efficacy of the patients with myocardial infarction. METHODS The current study was a clinical trial that was conducted in Ayatollah Kashani and Hajar hospitals in Shahr-e Kord (Iran) with the participation of 96 patients with myocardial infarction. The research units were blocked randomly into two 48-patient intervention and control groups. The training content was provided to the intervention group in five stages and they were asked to implement in three months. The demographic information questionnaire, the Ferrans and Powers Quality of Life questionnaire, and Sullivan Self-Efficacy questionnaire were the data collection instruments. The mean scores of pre and post-intervention were compared by the use of SPSS, version 16, software, paired t-test, single t-test, chi-square, and Fisher's Exact Test. FINDINGS The results showed that the mean squares of quality of life and self-efficacy in pre and postintervention had a significant difference and the intervention group had a higher quality of life and self-efficacy levels compared to the control group (P<0.001). CONCLUSION According to the results of the study, it is suggested to use this model for empowerment and caring of patients besides the medicinal treatments, so that it would not lead to inability, reduction about the medical centers, frequent hospitalization, and ultimately, reduction in medical costs, and promotion of the society's health.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于5a模型的自我管理方案对心肌梗死患者生活质量和自我效能的影响。
引言和目的心肌梗死是冠状动脉疾病最严重的表现。提高这些患者的自我效能感可以有效地改善他们的生活质量。本研究的目的是调查基于5A模型的自我管理计划对心肌梗死患者生活质量和自我效能的影响。方法目前的研究是在伊朗Shahr-e Kord的Ayatollah Kashani和Hajar医院进行的一项临床试验,有96名心肌梗死患者参与。研究单位被随机分为两个48名患者的干预组和对照组。培训内容分五个阶段提供给干预组,并要求他们在三个月内实施。人口统计信息问卷、Ferrans和Powers生活质量问卷以及Sullivan自我效能感问卷是数据收集工具。使用SPSS 16版软件、配对t检验、单t检验、卡方检验和Fisher精确检验对干预前后的平均得分进行比较。结果表明,干预前后生活质量和自我效能的均方存在显著差异,干预组的生活质量和自效能水平高于对照组(P<0.001),建议在药物治疗之外,将这种模式用于患者的赋权和护理,这样就不会导致医疗中心的无力、减少、频繁住院,最终降低医疗成本,促进社会健康。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Przeglad epidemiologiczny
Przeglad epidemiologiczny Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
64
期刊最新文献
A 13- year- old patient with acute cerebral nocardiosis: Case report and review. A retrospective study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of intrapleural alteplase in pediatric empyema. Blood infection of Capnocytophaga canimorsus etiology following a dog bite: case report and review of the available literature. Diagnosis of an atypical fever in a 55-year-old man. Hepatitis C in Poland in 2022.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1