Retractions of research papers by authors from the Arab region (1998-2018)

Q2 Social Sciences European Science Editing Pub Date : 2020-02-18 DOI:10.3897/ese.2020.e51002
S. A. Alryalat, Muayad I. Azzam, A. Massad, D. Alqatawneh
{"title":"Retractions of research papers by authors from the Arab region (1998-2018)","authors":"S. A. Alryalat, Muayad I. Azzam, A. Massad, D. Alqatawneh","doi":"10.3897/ese.2020.e51002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: To provide an overview of retractions of research papers contributed by authors from the Arab region.\n Method: Papers in which the first author was affiliated to an Arabian country were selected from the Retraction Watch database covering the period 1 January 1998 to 31 December 2018. The retrieved records were divided into nine categories based on the reasons for retraction.\n Results: The search yielded 322 retractions, and the most frequent reason for retraction was plagiarism (34.5%). The median time from publication to retraction was 14 (25%-75% percentile 5-30) months. The number of papers retracted each year as well as the number of papers published in a given year but subsequently retracted increased steadily over the 21 years. The proportion of retracted papers to the total number of published papers (0.17%) was higher than the global proportion and was the highest for Algeria (1%) and the lowest for Lebanon (0.03%). Of the countries within the Arab region, 12 out of 14 countries showed either plagiarism or duplication as the most common reason for retraction; however, the countries differed in terms of the number of retractions and the time from publishing to retraction.\n Conclusion: Plagiarism was the most common cause of retraction in the Arab countries. The increase in the number of papers retracted each year was probably because searches now extend farther in the past, whereas the increase in the number of papers published in a given year but subsequently retracted can be attributed to the overall increase in the number of papers published.","PeriodicalId":35360,"journal":{"name":"European Science Editing","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-02-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Science Editing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3897/ese.2020.e51002","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Objective: To provide an overview of retractions of research papers contributed by authors from the Arab region. Method: Papers in which the first author was affiliated to an Arabian country were selected from the Retraction Watch database covering the period 1 January 1998 to 31 December 2018. The retrieved records were divided into nine categories based on the reasons for retraction. Results: The search yielded 322 retractions, and the most frequent reason for retraction was plagiarism (34.5%). The median time from publication to retraction was 14 (25%-75% percentile 5-30) months. The number of papers retracted each year as well as the number of papers published in a given year but subsequently retracted increased steadily over the 21 years. The proportion of retracted papers to the total number of published papers (0.17%) was higher than the global proportion and was the highest for Algeria (1%) and the lowest for Lebanon (0.03%). Of the countries within the Arab region, 12 out of 14 countries showed either plagiarism or duplication as the most common reason for retraction; however, the countries differed in terms of the number of retractions and the time from publishing to retraction. Conclusion: Plagiarism was the most common cause of retraction in the Arab countries. The increase in the number of papers retracted each year was probably because searches now extend farther in the past, whereas the increase in the number of papers published in a given year but subsequently retracted can be attributed to the overall increase in the number of papers published.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
1998-2018年阿拉伯地区作者论文撤回情况
目的:综述阿拉伯地区作者发表的研究论文的撤稿情况。方法:从撤稿观察数据库中选取1998年1月1日至2018年12月31日期间第一作者隶属于阿拉伯国家的论文。根据撤稿原因将检索到的记录分为9类。结果:共检索到322篇撤稿,撤稿最常见的原因是抄袭(34.5%)。从发表到撤回的中位时间为14个月(25%-75%百分位数5-30)。在过去的21年里,每年被撤回的论文数量以及某一年发表但随后被撤回的论文数量都在稳步增长。撤回论文占发表论文总数的比例(0.17%)高于全球比例,阿尔及利亚最高(1%),黎巴嫩最低(0.03%)。在阿拉伯地区的国家中,14个国家中有12个国家表示抄袭或重复是撤回论文的最常见原因;然而,这些国家在撤稿数量和从发表到撤稿的时间上存在差异。结论:抄袭是阿拉伯国家论文撤稿最常见的原因。每年被撤回论文数量的增加可能是因为现在的搜索范围比过去扩大了,而某一年发表但随后被撤回的论文数量的增加可归因于发表论文数量的总体增加。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
European Science Editing
European Science Editing Social Sciences-Communication
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
17
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: EASE"s journal, European Science Editing , publishes articles, reports meetings, announces new developments and forthcoming events, reviews books, software and online resources, and highlights publications of interest to members.
期刊最新文献
Introducing the EASE Interactive Checklist for Submitting Authors A journal veracity–diligence index Lists of predatory journals and publishers: a review for future refinement Article processing charges suppress the scholarship of doctoral students Bibliometric analysis of publications trends in Indonesian research institutions: A comparison of pre-integration (2015–2021) and post-integration (2022–2023) periods
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1