Experimental Design of Oxidative Desulfurization of Kerosene Through Response Surface Methodology (RSM)

Q3 Environmental Science Tikrit Journal of Engineering Sciences Pub Date : 2023-07-30 DOI:10.25130/tjes.30.2.14
A. Jarullah, Hamin J. Mohammed
{"title":"Experimental Design of Oxidative Desulfurization of Kerosene Through Response Surface Methodology (RSM)","authors":"A. Jarullah, Hamin J. Mohammed","doi":"10.25130/tjes.30.2.14","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Sulfur compound content in fuels is one of the most undesirable pollutions regarding standard environmental regulations that demand to reduce sulfur concentration limit to 5-10% in fuels. Hence, kerosene’s oxidative desulfurization (ODS) as a model fuel (sulfur content 1158ppm) with air as an oxidant is studied. The goal of the study is to use two different synthesized nanosilica-supported catalysts, CuO/SiO2 (CAT-1) and CuO/TiO2-SiO2 (CAT-2), for the ODS of kerosene. Thirty-two experimental runs were designed via Central Composite Design (CCD) to select the experiments that will be utilized most efficiently. The analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used for statistical analysis to determine the models’ significance. The Response surface methodology (RSM) was used to determine the optimum conditions and parameters significantly affecting the response. Temperature and time are two variables studied due to their impact on oxidative desulfurization. The actual results of sulfur conversion in kerosene from lab experiments were 87% with a sulfur content of 153.3ppm and 99.22% with a sulfur content of 8.9ppm by CAT-1 and CAT-2, respectively, at conditions of 140°C and 100min. The predicted results from experimental design were 86.66% and 99.8% by CAT-1 and CAT-2 at conditions of 140°C and 100min, showing errors less than 3.1% and 1.2% for CAT-1 and CAT-2, respectively, from ANOVA. The optimal parameters of ODS were determined through the sulfur conversion maximization by numerical optimization via ANOVA. The results showed that the maximum conversion by CAT-1 was 99.5% at 140 min and 180°C, and by CAT-2 was 99.7% at 100.1 min and 140.1°C. Also, the rate data were fitted with an empirical kinetic model. The results showed that CAT-1 and CAT-2 activation energies were Ea= 28.2 kJ/mol and Ea= 38.7 kJ/mol, respectively.","PeriodicalId":30589,"journal":{"name":"Tikrit Journal of Engineering Sciences","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tikrit Journal of Engineering Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25130/tjes.30.2.14","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Environmental Science","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Sulfur compound content in fuels is one of the most undesirable pollutions regarding standard environmental regulations that demand to reduce sulfur concentration limit to 5-10% in fuels. Hence, kerosene’s oxidative desulfurization (ODS) as a model fuel (sulfur content 1158ppm) with air as an oxidant is studied. The goal of the study is to use two different synthesized nanosilica-supported catalysts, CuO/SiO2 (CAT-1) and CuO/TiO2-SiO2 (CAT-2), for the ODS of kerosene. Thirty-two experimental runs were designed via Central Composite Design (CCD) to select the experiments that will be utilized most efficiently. The analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used for statistical analysis to determine the models’ significance. The Response surface methodology (RSM) was used to determine the optimum conditions and parameters significantly affecting the response. Temperature and time are two variables studied due to their impact on oxidative desulfurization. The actual results of sulfur conversion in kerosene from lab experiments were 87% with a sulfur content of 153.3ppm and 99.22% with a sulfur content of 8.9ppm by CAT-1 and CAT-2, respectively, at conditions of 140°C and 100min. The predicted results from experimental design were 86.66% and 99.8% by CAT-1 and CAT-2 at conditions of 140°C and 100min, showing errors less than 3.1% and 1.2% for CAT-1 and CAT-2, respectively, from ANOVA. The optimal parameters of ODS were determined through the sulfur conversion maximization by numerical optimization via ANOVA. The results showed that the maximum conversion by CAT-1 was 99.5% at 140 min and 180°C, and by CAT-2 was 99.7% at 100.1 min and 140.1°C. Also, the rate data were fitted with an empirical kinetic model. The results showed that CAT-1 and CAT-2 activation energies were Ea= 28.2 kJ/mol and Ea= 38.7 kJ/mol, respectively.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
响应面法煤油氧化脱硫试验设计
燃料中的硫化合物含量是标准环境法规中要求将燃料中的硫浓度限制降低到5-10%的最不受欢迎的污染之一。因此,以煤油为模型燃料(含硫量1158ppm),以空气为氧化剂,对其氧化脱硫(ODS)进行了研究。本研究的目的是使用两种不同的合成纳米二氧化硅负载催化剂,CuO/SiO2 (CAT-1)和CuO/TiO2-SiO2 (CAT-2),用于煤油的ODS。通过中央组合设计(CCD)设计了32个实验运行,以选择最有效利用的实验。采用方差分析(ANOVA)进行统计分析,以确定模型的显著性。采用响应面法(RSM)确定了对反应有显著影响的最佳条件和参数。研究了温度和时间对氧化脱硫的影响。在140°C和100min条件下,CAT-1和CAT-2对煤油中硫的实际转化率分别为87%和99.22%,硫含量为153.3ppm和8.9ppm。在140°C和100min条件下,CAT-1和CAT-2对试验设计的预测结果分别为86.66%和99.8%,方差分析结果显示,CAT-1和CAT-2的误差分别小于3.1%和1.2%。通过方差分析的数值优化,实现硫转化率最大化,确定了ODS的最佳工艺参数。结果表明,CAT-1在140 min和180℃时的最大转化率为99.5%,CAT-2在100.1 min和140.1℃时的最大转化率为99.7%。并用经验动力学模型拟合了反应速率数据。结果表明,CAT-1和CAT-2的活化能分别为Ea= 28.2 kJ/mol和Ea= 38.7 kJ/mol。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
56
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊最新文献
Generative AI Chatbot for Engineering Scientific Journal MnO2 Nano Particles Modified a Double Layer Cathode Reactor for an Efficient Removal of DBT in Diesel Underwater Wireless Optical Communication for IOT using Coding MIMO Diversity Climate Change’s Impacts on Drought in Upper Zab Basin, Iraq: A Case Study Cascaded H–Bridge Multilevel Inverter: Review of Topologies and Pulse Width Modulation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1