Perchlorate: The Two-Decade Journey to a Proposed Rule

S. Goldhaber
{"title":"Perchlorate: The Two-Decade Journey to a Proposed Rule","authors":"S. Goldhaber","doi":"10.15226/2572-3162/4/1/00128","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Perchlorate, a manufactured and naturally occurring chemical, was first detected in drinking water supplies in California in the 1980s. In the 1990s, perchlorate contamination (in the parts-per-billion range) was detected in drinking water supplies across the U.S. EPA began evaluating perchlorate for regulation in drinking water in 1998 and has spent 21 years issuing various proposals and findings on perchlorate, with a proposed (not final) drinking water regulation issued on June 26, 2019. The lack of a drinking water standard has had ramifications, including lack of trust in public drinking water resulting in economic hardship, particularly among Department of Defense personnel and other low-wealth communities, the states setting a patchwork of their own regulations on perchlorate, and lack of monitoring or clean-up of perchlorate in Department of Defense water systems. The reasons for EPA’s two-decade rulemaking process for perchlorate include the process EPA uses to determine regulatory feasibility under the Safe Drinking Water Act and the multi-year scientific review process. Key recommendations for shortening the process include amending the Safe Drinking Water Act and increasing transparency of the rulemaking process. List of Abbreviations: BMDL- Benchmark Dose Level; CCL- Contaminant Candidate List; DOD- Department of Defense; DWEL- Drinking Water Equivalent Level; EPA- Environmental Protection Agency; GAO- General Accountability Office; HRL- Health Reference Level; IRIS- Integrated Risk Information System; LOAEL- Lowest-Observed-Adverse-Effect Level; MCL- Maximum Contaminant Level; MCLG- Maximum Contaminant Level Goal; NOAEL- No-Observed-Adverse-Effect Level; NRC- National Research Council; RfD- Reference Dose; RSC- Relative Source Contribution; SAB-Science Advisory Board; SDWA- Safe Drinking Water Act","PeriodicalId":93649,"journal":{"name":"International journal of scientific research in environmental science and toxicology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-09-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of scientific research in environmental science and toxicology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15226/2572-3162/4/1/00128","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Perchlorate, a manufactured and naturally occurring chemical, was first detected in drinking water supplies in California in the 1980s. In the 1990s, perchlorate contamination (in the parts-per-billion range) was detected in drinking water supplies across the U.S. EPA began evaluating perchlorate for regulation in drinking water in 1998 and has spent 21 years issuing various proposals and findings on perchlorate, with a proposed (not final) drinking water regulation issued on June 26, 2019. The lack of a drinking water standard has had ramifications, including lack of trust in public drinking water resulting in economic hardship, particularly among Department of Defense personnel and other low-wealth communities, the states setting a patchwork of their own regulations on perchlorate, and lack of monitoring or clean-up of perchlorate in Department of Defense water systems. The reasons for EPA’s two-decade rulemaking process for perchlorate include the process EPA uses to determine regulatory feasibility under the Safe Drinking Water Act and the multi-year scientific review process. Key recommendations for shortening the process include amending the Safe Drinking Water Act and increasing transparency of the rulemaking process. List of Abbreviations: BMDL- Benchmark Dose Level; CCL- Contaminant Candidate List; DOD- Department of Defense; DWEL- Drinking Water Equivalent Level; EPA- Environmental Protection Agency; GAO- General Accountability Office; HRL- Health Reference Level; IRIS- Integrated Risk Information System; LOAEL- Lowest-Observed-Adverse-Effect Level; MCL- Maximum Contaminant Level; MCLG- Maximum Contaminant Level Goal; NOAEL- No-Observed-Adverse-Effect Level; NRC- National Research Council; RfD- Reference Dose; RSC- Relative Source Contribution; SAB-Science Advisory Board; SDWA- Safe Drinking Water Act
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
高氯酸盐:制定拟议规则的二十年历程
高氯酸盐是一种人造的天然化学物质,于20世纪80年代首次在加州的饮用水供应中检测到。在20世纪90年代,美国各地的饮用水供应中检测到高氯酸盐污染(十亿分之一范围内)。美国环保署于1998年开始评估高氯酸盐在饮用水中的监管作用,并花了21年时间发布了关于高氯酸盐的各种建议和调查结果,并于2019年6月26日发布了一项拟议(非最终)饮用水法规。缺乏饮用水标准已经产生了一些后果,包括对公共饮用水缺乏信任导致经济困难,特别是在国防部人员和其他低财富社区中,各州制定了自己的高氯酸盐法规,以及缺乏对国防部水系统中高氯酸盐的监测或清理。EPA对高氯酸盐的规则制定过程长达20年,原因包括EPA根据《安全饮用水法》确定监管可行性的过程,以及多年的科学审查过程。缩短这一过程的主要建议包括修改《安全饮用水法》和提高规则制定过程的透明度。缩略语列表:BMDL-基准剂量水平;CCL-污染物候选清单;DOD—国防部;饮用水当量水位线;EPA—环境保护署;GAO——总问责局;HRL——健康参考水平;综合风险信息系统;LOAEL—最低观察到的不良效应水平;MCL-最大污染物水平;MCLG-最大污染物水平目标;NOAEL-未观察到的不良影响水平;NRC—国家研究委员会;RfD—参考剂量;RSC-相对来源贡献;科学顾问委员会;SDWA-安全饮用水法案
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Statistical Analysis of Rainfall Variations in Duhok City and Semel District, Kurdistan Region of Iraq Bio treatment Strategies for the Removal of Phthalate Esters from Asa River using Chlorella vulgaris (MG257915) and Nannochloropsis sp (MG257918) as Biodegradation Tool Application of Mathematical Models for Predicting the Trihalomethanes Content in Drinking Water in the City of Struga, North Macedonia Quality Assessment and Recyclability of Plastic from Household Waste to Eco-Friendly Paver Block Assessing Landcover Change for the Management of Floral and Aquatic Ecosystem in Kalikiliki Area of Lusaka, Zambia
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1