Lessons Learned from 27 Years’ Experience and Focus Operating on Symptomatic Conditions of the Spine under Local Anesthesia:The Role and Future of Endoscopic Spine Surgery as a “Disruptive Technique” for Evidenced Based Medicine.

A. Yeung
{"title":"Lessons Learned from 27 Years’ Experience and Focus Operating on Symptomatic Conditions of the Spine under Local Anesthesia:The Role and Future of Endoscopic Spine Surgery as a “Disruptive Technique” for Evidenced Based Medicine.","authors":"A. Yeung","doi":"10.4172/2165-7939.1000413","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Practice of Medicine will always be an art based on science. The human body is more complex and not like a mathematical formula. History has shown that concepts in medicine, judged by “key opinion” leaders, currently depend on scientific publications that affect medical treatment through the medical literature. Strict adherence to Cochrane criteria and old “evidence based” concepts are used for scientific dissemination and publication, but also used for insurance reimbursement in the United States. Health care is becoming more and more supported by government subsidy and payment is dependent on guidelines established by each payer. The ability of innovative and valuable level five expert EBM opinions to get published for dissemination to the scientific community can be difficult for researchers because institutional support or NIH funding is the usual pathway. If there is no institutional support, researchers must pay fees to get their work published in open access Journals. It may be the time to consider “innovative disruption” as a form of evidence based medicine to mitigate the unsustainable increasing cost of health care for spine treatment. Endoscopic spine surgery fits consideration as an innovative disruptive procedure. Patients seeking advice from their chosen physician or health care provider for their physical complaints are for conditions that are based on the Physiology and Patho-anatomy causing their symptoms. In spinal conditions, while most patients are not taken seriously until they complain of “debilitating” pain, symptomatic conditions that can be resolved with tincture of time and/or supportive modalities are supported by allopathic as well as homeopathic and naturopathic physicians. Surgical or invasive procedures are usually reserved for more specific allopathic conditions. These conditions may cause not just pain, but numbness, a change in sensation, weakness, or only intermittent debilitation. The symptoms may also reflect separate and concomitant symptoms that can be confusing when the physician focuses on a single source of the symptom. Extensive experience and perseverance with techniques that work for the clinician is valuable when there is a database large enough to be studied and mined, to demonstrate statistical significance. Such is the case with procedures that can be validated by endoscopic imaging to evaluate, and validate the complaint by the ultimate result: symptom resolution. Traditional radiologic Imaging by itself, however, is inadequate to explain complaints of symptoms that may or may not be debilitating in the physician’s judgment, and the patient may be simply dismissed or prescribed a drug to mitigate the complaint. This has, in many ways, contributed to the myriad of pharma solutions to every symptom complaint in allopathic medicine. A myriad of Naturo-pathic remedies are also marketed and sold over the counter, supported by millions of symptom sufferers who do not expect insurance reimbursement. There are also allopathic means to diagnose and treat symptomatic conditions in the spine, especially in the lumbar spine that currently garners third party reimbursement. The role and future of endoscopic spine surgery is supported here as an innovative disruption to our current means for scientific validation. Performed expertly and properly, a “warrantee” can be provided.","PeriodicalId":89593,"journal":{"name":"Journal of spine","volume":" ","pages":"1-5"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-04-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.4172/2165-7939.1000413","citationCount":"13","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of spine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4172/2165-7939.1000413","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 13

Abstract

The Practice of Medicine will always be an art based on science. The human body is more complex and not like a mathematical formula. History has shown that concepts in medicine, judged by “key opinion” leaders, currently depend on scientific publications that affect medical treatment through the medical literature. Strict adherence to Cochrane criteria and old “evidence based” concepts are used for scientific dissemination and publication, but also used for insurance reimbursement in the United States. Health care is becoming more and more supported by government subsidy and payment is dependent on guidelines established by each payer. The ability of innovative and valuable level five expert EBM opinions to get published for dissemination to the scientific community can be difficult for researchers because institutional support or NIH funding is the usual pathway. If there is no institutional support, researchers must pay fees to get their work published in open access Journals. It may be the time to consider “innovative disruption” as a form of evidence based medicine to mitigate the unsustainable increasing cost of health care for spine treatment. Endoscopic spine surgery fits consideration as an innovative disruptive procedure. Patients seeking advice from their chosen physician or health care provider for their physical complaints are for conditions that are based on the Physiology and Patho-anatomy causing their symptoms. In spinal conditions, while most patients are not taken seriously until they complain of “debilitating” pain, symptomatic conditions that can be resolved with tincture of time and/or supportive modalities are supported by allopathic as well as homeopathic and naturopathic physicians. Surgical or invasive procedures are usually reserved for more specific allopathic conditions. These conditions may cause not just pain, but numbness, a change in sensation, weakness, or only intermittent debilitation. The symptoms may also reflect separate and concomitant symptoms that can be confusing when the physician focuses on a single source of the symptom. Extensive experience and perseverance with techniques that work for the clinician is valuable when there is a database large enough to be studied and mined, to demonstrate statistical significance. Such is the case with procedures that can be validated by endoscopic imaging to evaluate, and validate the complaint by the ultimate result: symptom resolution. Traditional radiologic Imaging by itself, however, is inadequate to explain complaints of symptoms that may or may not be debilitating in the physician’s judgment, and the patient may be simply dismissed or prescribed a drug to mitigate the complaint. This has, in many ways, contributed to the myriad of pharma solutions to every symptom complaint in allopathic medicine. A myriad of Naturo-pathic remedies are also marketed and sold over the counter, supported by millions of symptom sufferers who do not expect insurance reimbursement. There are also allopathic means to diagnose and treat symptomatic conditions in the spine, especially in the lumbar spine that currently garners third party reimbursement. The role and future of endoscopic spine surgery is supported here as an innovative disruption to our current means for scientific validation. Performed expertly and properly, a “warrantee” can be provided.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
27年的经验教训和对局部麻醉下脊柱症状的重点操作:内窥镜脊柱手术作为循证医学的“颠覆性技术”的作用和未来。
医学实践永远是一门建立在科学基础上的艺术。人体更复杂,不像数学公式。历史表明,由“关键意见”领袖判断的医学概念目前依赖于通过医学文献影响医疗的科学出版物。严格遵守Cochrane标准和古老的“循证”概念不仅用于科学传播和出版,也用于美国的保险报销。医疗保健越来越受到政府补贴的支持,支付取决于每个付款人制定的指导方针。创新和有价值的第五级实证医学专家意见发表并传播到科学界的能力对研究人员来说可能很困难,因为机构支持或NIH资助是通常的途径。如果没有机构支持,研究人员必须付费才能在开放获取期刊上发表他们的研究成果。也许是时候考虑“创新破坏”作为循证医学的一种形式,以减轻脊柱治疗的医疗保健费用不可持续的增加。内窥镜脊柱手术适合考虑作为一个创新的破坏性程序。患者向他们选择的医生或卫生保健提供者咨询他们的身体抱怨是基于生理和病理解剖导致他们的症状的条件。在脊柱疾病中,虽然大多数患者在抱怨“使人衰弱”的疼痛之前不会被认真对待,但对抗性疗法、顺势疗法和自然疗法的医生支持可以通过时间酊剂和/或支持方式解决的症状性疾病。外科手术或侵入性手术通常用于更具体的对抗疾病。这些情况不仅会引起疼痛,还会引起麻木、感觉改变、虚弱或只是间歇性虚弱。这些症状也可能反映单独的和伴随的症状,当医生关注症状的单一来源时,这些症状可能会令人困惑。当有一个足够大的数据库可供研究和挖掘,以显示统计意义时,临床医生对技术的广泛经验和坚持是有价值的。这种情况下的程序可以通过内窥镜成像来评估,并通过最终结果验证投诉:症状解决。然而,传统的放射成像本身不足以解释在医生的判断中可能或可能不会使人衰弱的症状的主诉,并且患者可能被简单地解雇或开一种药物来减轻主诉。这在许多方面促成了对抗疗法医学中各种症状投诉的无数药物解决方案。无数的自然疗法也在市场上销售,并在柜台上出售,数以百万计的症状患者不期望保险报销。也有对抗疗法的手段来诊断和治疗脊柱的症状,特别是在腰椎,目前获得第三方报销。内窥镜脊柱手术的作用和未来在这里得到支持,作为对我们目前科学验证手段的创新破坏。如果执行得当,可以提供“保证”。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Nerve Injury in Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion Importance of Anticoagulants and Antiplatelet Agents in Spine Surgery Theoretical Model of the Lumbar Spine Musculature Editorial Note on Spondylolysis & Spondylolisthesis A Rare Case of Metastatic Spinal Cord Compression Originating from Extragonadal Mediastinal Yolk Sac Tumor: A Case Report
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1