Capacity of the Pectoralis Major Muscle May Be a Prognostic Factor for Aspiration Pneumonia

Pub Date : 2017-10-11 DOI:10.4236/AAR.2017.66011
K. Sakaguchi, Shuichiro Hara
{"title":"Capacity of the Pectoralis Major Muscle May Be a Prognostic Factor for Aspiration Pneumonia","authors":"K. Sakaguchi, Shuichiro Hara","doi":"10.4236/AAR.2017.66011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: Aspiration pneumonia is thought to be caused by a decline in respiratory and swallowing function. We aimed to clarify whether the pectoralis major muscle and the rectus abdominis muscles are prognostic factors for aspiration pneumonia and to investigate the relationships between these muscles and nutritional status, swallowing function and sarcopenia, Methods: Medical records of 139 Japanese patients hospitalized for aspiration pneumonia between December 2010 and December 2014 were reviewed retrospectively. The volume and thickness of the pectoralis major muscle, the crosssectional area and thickness of the rectus abdominis muscles, and cross-sectional area of the psoas major muscle were measured using computed tomography. Swallowing function, nutritional status, activities of daily living, and prognosis also were evaluated. Results: The volume [Median: (left) 4713.2 mm3 vs. 4232.6 mm3 (right) 4981.7 mm3 vs. 4362.6 mm3 p < 0.05] and thickness [Median: (left) 6.9 mm vs. 4.6 mm (right) 7.3 mm vs. 5.7 mm p < 0.01] of the pectoralis major muscle and thickness of the right rectus abdominis muscles [Median: 7.3 mm vs. 5.8 mm p < 0.05] were significantly larger, while Mini-Nutritional Assessment Short Form (MNA-SF) [Median: 6.0 vs. 4.0 p < 0.01] and Functional Oral Intake Scale (FOIS) [Median: 3 vs. 1 p < 0.01] scores were significantly higher in patients who survived. The volume [Median: (left) 5789.1 mm3 vs. 3706.5 mm3 (right) 5650.3 mm3 vs. 4003.7 mm3 p < 0.01] and thickness [Median: (left) 7.1 mm vs. 5.9 mm p < 0.05] of the pectoralis major muscle and cross-sectional area of the psoas major muscle (left and right) [Median: (left) 500.1 mm2 vs. 432.0 mm2 (right) 563.5 mm2 vs. 446.3 mm2 p < 0.01] were significantly larger, while albumin levels [Median: 3.8 g/dl vs. 3.4g/dl p < 0.01] and MNA-SF [Median: 6.0 vs. 5.0 p < 0.01] and FOIS [Median: 4 vs. 1 p < 0.01] scores were significantly higher in patients with coexisting diseases. Conclusion: The capacity of the pectoralis major muscle may be an independent factor in the prognosis of elderly patients with aspiration pneumonia as a primary disease.","PeriodicalId":90413,"journal":{"name":"","volume":"06 1","pages":"101-117"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2017-10-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4236/AAR.2017.66011","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Aspiration pneumonia is thought to be caused by a decline in respiratory and swallowing function. We aimed to clarify whether the pectoralis major muscle and the rectus abdominis muscles are prognostic factors for aspiration pneumonia and to investigate the relationships between these muscles and nutritional status, swallowing function and sarcopenia, Methods: Medical records of 139 Japanese patients hospitalized for aspiration pneumonia between December 2010 and December 2014 were reviewed retrospectively. The volume and thickness of the pectoralis major muscle, the crosssectional area and thickness of the rectus abdominis muscles, and cross-sectional area of the psoas major muscle were measured using computed tomography. Swallowing function, nutritional status, activities of daily living, and prognosis also were evaluated. Results: The volume [Median: (left) 4713.2 mm3 vs. 4232.6 mm3 (right) 4981.7 mm3 vs. 4362.6 mm3 p < 0.05] and thickness [Median: (left) 6.9 mm vs. 4.6 mm (right) 7.3 mm vs. 5.7 mm p < 0.01] of the pectoralis major muscle and thickness of the right rectus abdominis muscles [Median: 7.3 mm vs. 5.8 mm p < 0.05] were significantly larger, while Mini-Nutritional Assessment Short Form (MNA-SF) [Median: 6.0 vs. 4.0 p < 0.01] and Functional Oral Intake Scale (FOIS) [Median: 3 vs. 1 p < 0.01] scores were significantly higher in patients who survived. The volume [Median: (left) 5789.1 mm3 vs. 3706.5 mm3 (right) 5650.3 mm3 vs. 4003.7 mm3 p < 0.01] and thickness [Median: (left) 7.1 mm vs. 5.9 mm p < 0.05] of the pectoralis major muscle and cross-sectional area of the psoas major muscle (left and right) [Median: (left) 500.1 mm2 vs. 432.0 mm2 (right) 563.5 mm2 vs. 446.3 mm2 p < 0.01] were significantly larger, while albumin levels [Median: 3.8 g/dl vs. 3.4g/dl p < 0.01] and MNA-SF [Median: 6.0 vs. 5.0 p < 0.01] and FOIS [Median: 4 vs. 1 p < 0.01] scores were significantly higher in patients with coexisting diseases. Conclusion: The capacity of the pectoralis major muscle may be an independent factor in the prognosis of elderly patients with aspiration pneumonia as a primary disease.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
胸大肌容量可能是吸入性肺炎的预后因素
目的:吸入性肺炎被认为是由呼吸和吞咽功能下降引起的。我们旨在阐明胸大肌和腹直肌是否是吸入性肺炎的预后因素,并研究这些肌肉与营养状况、吞咽功能和少肌症之间的关系,方法:回顾性分析2010年12月至2014年12月因吸入性肺炎住院的139名日本患者的病历。使用计算机断层扫描测量胸大肌的体积和厚度、腹直肌的横截面积和厚度以及腰大肌的横截面面积。对吞咽功能、营养状况、日常生活活动和预后进行评估。结果:胸大肌的体积[中位数:(左)4713.2mm3对4232.6mm3(右)4981.7mm3对4362.6mm3,p<0.05]和厚度[中位数:,而迷你营养评估简表(MNA-SF)[中位:6.0 vs.4.0 p<0.01]和功能性口腔摄入量表(FOIS)[中位数:3 vs.1 p<0.01]评分在存活患者中显著较高。胸大肌的体积[中值:(左)5789.1 mm3对3706.5 mm3(右)5650.3 mm3对4003.7 mm3 p<0.01]和厚度[中值:,而白蛋白水平[中位数:3.8 g/dl vs.3.4g/dl p<0.01]和MNA-SF[中位数:6.0 vs.5.0 p<0.01]以及FOIS[中位数:4 vs.1 p<0.01]评分在共存疾病的患者中显著较高。结论:胸肌容量可能是影响老年原发性吸入性肺炎患者预后的一个独立因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1