A Study on the Efficiency of General Takaful Operators in Malaysia: Post Implementation of IFSA 2013

Q4 Economics, Econometrics and Finance Iranian Economic Review Pub Date : 2021-10-12 DOI:10.22059/IER.2021.83926
Amirul Afif Muhamat, Mohd Faizal Basri, Muhammad Nizam Jaafar, Dhiya Natasya Aqila Mohd Azlan, N. Zamri
{"title":"A Study on the Efficiency of General Takaful Operators in Malaysia: Post Implementation of IFSA 2013","authors":"Amirul Afif Muhamat, Mohd Faizal Basri, Muhammad Nizam Jaafar, Dhiya Natasya Aqila Mohd Azlan, N. Zamri","doi":"10.22059/IER.2021.83926","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study aims to measure the efficiency of the general Takaful operators in Malaysia with the selected inputs, labour cost and management fees. On the other hand, the output used is gross contribution. General Takaful operators are the institutions governed by the Islamic Financial Services Act 2013 (IFSA). IFSA 2013 is the key statute governing the Islamic finance sector, which replaced statutes such as the Islamic Banking Act 1983 and the Takaful Act 1984. Based on the annual data gathered from 2014 to 2018 (post implementation of IFSA 2013), the efficiency is analysed using Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) on four selected institutions in the general Takaful business. DEA results show that Etiqa General Takaful Berhad, Syarikat Takaful Malaysia Am Berhad are considered as the most efficient. The rest of general takaful operators in the sample were deemed technical inefficient. The results also indicate that inefficient institutions including those with the lowest performance which are Takaful Ikhlas General Berhad and Zurich General Takaful Malaysia Berhad have inefficient management in resource utilisation. In conclusion, the findings have confirmed the market share theory and infer to the expense-preference behaviour on the part of the general Takaful operator. Perhaps, the general Takaful operators are posed with an expedient manner trying to satisfy their own benefits. In order to achieve full efficiency, any Takaful operators have to increase its market share segments by increasing its gross income and contribution through developing demand for general Takaful products and mostly on takaful product itself.","PeriodicalId":38289,"journal":{"name":"Iranian Economic Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Iranian Economic Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22059/IER.2021.83926","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study aims to measure the efficiency of the general Takaful operators in Malaysia with the selected inputs, labour cost and management fees. On the other hand, the output used is gross contribution. General Takaful operators are the institutions governed by the Islamic Financial Services Act 2013 (IFSA). IFSA 2013 is the key statute governing the Islamic finance sector, which replaced statutes such as the Islamic Banking Act 1983 and the Takaful Act 1984. Based on the annual data gathered from 2014 to 2018 (post implementation of IFSA 2013), the efficiency is analysed using Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) on four selected institutions in the general Takaful business. DEA results show that Etiqa General Takaful Berhad, Syarikat Takaful Malaysia Am Berhad are considered as the most efficient. The rest of general takaful operators in the sample were deemed technical inefficient. The results also indicate that inefficient institutions including those with the lowest performance which are Takaful Ikhlas General Berhad and Zurich General Takaful Malaysia Berhad have inefficient management in resource utilisation. In conclusion, the findings have confirmed the market share theory and infer to the expense-preference behaviour on the part of the general Takaful operator. Perhaps, the general Takaful operators are posed with an expedient manner trying to satisfy their own benefits. In order to achieve full efficiency, any Takaful operators have to increase its market share segments by increasing its gross income and contribution through developing demand for general Takaful products and mostly on takaful product itself.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
马来西亚一般回教考试经营者的效率研究:IFSA 2013实施后
本研究的目的是衡量一般回教保险运营商在马来西亚与选定的投入,劳动力成本和管理费用的效率。另一方面,使用的产出是总贡献。一般回教保险运营商是受2013年伊斯兰金融服务法(IFSA)管辖的机构。IFSA 2013是管理伊斯兰金融部门的关键法规,取代了1983年伊斯兰银行法和1984年伊斯兰教法等法规。根据2014年至2018年(IFSA 2013实施后)收集的年度数据,使用数据包络分析(DEA)对一般回教业务中选定的四家机构进行了效率分析。DEA结果显示,Etiqa General Takaful Berhad, Syarikat Takaful Malaysia Am Berhad被认为是最有效的。样本中其余的普通操作人员被认为技术效率低下。结果还表明,效率低下的机构,包括绩效最低的伊斯兰教控股有限公司和苏黎世伊斯兰教控股马来西亚有限公司,在资源利用方面的管理效率低下。综上所述,研究结果证实了市场份额理论,并对普通回教运营商的费用偏好行为进行了推断。也许,一般回教法的经营者都以一种权宜之计的方式试图满足自己的利益。为了达到充分的效率,任何回教经营者都必须通过发展对一般回教产品的需求和主要是对回教产品本身的需求来增加其总收入和贡献,从而增加其细分市场份额。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Iranian Economic Review
Iranian Economic Review Economics, Econometrics and Finance-Economics, Econometrics and Finance (all)
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Role of Institutional Quality in the Impact of Oil Rents on Financial Development in Brazil and Norway Interaction between Financial Cycles and Business Cycles in Iran: A Bayesian Approach The Threshold and Asymmetric Effects of Financial Development on Economic Growth in BRICS Countries: Evidence from Panel Threshold-ARDL Forecasting Gasoline Consumption in Iran using Deep Learning Approaches Identifying the Moderating Role of Income Smoothing and Credit Quality towards Corporate Governance and Determinants
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1