Decision Making: Rational Choice or Hyper-Rational Choice

G. Askari, M. Gordji
{"title":"Decision Making: Rational Choice or Hyper-Rational Choice","authors":"G. Askari, M. Gordji","doi":"10.19139/soic-2310-5070-638","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this paper, we provide an interpretation of the rationality in game theory in which player consider the profit or loss of the opponent in addition to personal profit at the game. The goal of a game analysis with two hyper-rationality players is to provide insight into real-world situations that are often more complex than a game with two rational players where the choices of strategy are only based on individual preferences. The hyper-rationality does not mean perfect rationality but an insight toward how human decision-makers behave in interactive decisions. The findings of this research can help to enlarge our understanding of the psychological aspects of strategy choices in games and also provide an analysis of the decision-making process with cognitive economics approach at the same time.","PeriodicalId":93376,"journal":{"name":"Statistics, optimization & information computing","volume":"8 1","pages":"583-589"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-05-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Statistics, optimization & information computing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.19139/soic-2310-5070-638","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

In this paper, we provide an interpretation of the rationality in game theory in which player consider the profit or loss of the opponent in addition to personal profit at the game. The goal of a game analysis with two hyper-rationality players is to provide insight into real-world situations that are often more complex than a game with two rational players where the choices of strategy are only based on individual preferences. The hyper-rationality does not mean perfect rationality but an insight toward how human decision-makers behave in interactive decisions. The findings of this research can help to enlarge our understanding of the psychological aspects of strategy choices in games and also provide an analysis of the decision-making process with cognitive economics approach at the same time.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
决策:理性选择还是超理性选择
在本文中,我们解释了博弈论中的合理性,即玩家在游戏中除了考虑个人利益外,还考虑对手的利益或损失。两个超理性玩家的游戏分析的目标是深入了解现实世界中的情况,这些情况通常比两个理性玩家的比赛更复杂,因为在两个理性游戏中,策略的选择只基于个人偏好。超理性并不意味着完全理性,而是对人类决策者在互动决策中行为的洞察。本研究的发现有助于扩大我们对游戏策略选择的心理方面的理解,同时也有助于用认知经济学的方法对决策过程进行分析。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Statistical Analysis Based on Adaptive Progressive Hybrid Censored Data From Lomax Distribution A Berry-Esseen Bound for Nonlinear Statistics with Bounded Differences The Weibull Distribution: Reliability Characterization Based on Linear and Circular Consecutive Systems Infinity Substitute in Finding Exact Minimum of Total Weighted Tardiness in Tight-Tardy Progressive 1-machine Scheduling by Idling-free Preemptions Testing the Validity of Lindley Model Based on Informational Energy with Application to Real Medical Data
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1