Comparison of Metabolic Profiles of Normal and Cancer Cells in Response to Cytotoxic Agents

IF 0.4 Q4 BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS Journal of the Korean magnetic resonance society Pub Date : 2017-03-20 DOI:10.6564/JKMRS.2017.21.1.031
Sujin Lee, Sunmi Kang, Sunghyouk Park
{"title":"Comparison of Metabolic Profiles of Normal and Cancer Cells in Response to Cytotoxic Agents","authors":"Sujin Lee, Sunmi Kang, Sunghyouk Park","doi":"10.6564/JKMRS.2017.21.1.031","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Together with radiotherapy, chemotherapy using cytotoxic agents is one of the most common therapies in cancer. Metabolic changes in cancer cells are drawing much attention recently, but the metabolic alterations by anticancer agents have not been much studied. Here, we investigated the effects of commonly used cytotoxic agents on lung normal cell MRC5 and lung cancer cell A549. We employed cis-plastin, doxorubicin, and 5-Fluorouracil and compared their effects on the viability and metabolism of the normal and cancer cell lines. We first established the concentration of the cytotoxic reagents that give differences in the viabilities of normal and cancer cell lines. In those conditions, the viability of A549 decreased significantly, whereas that of MRC5 remained unchanged. To study the metabolic alterations implicated in the viability differences, we obtained the metabolic profiles using 1 H-NMR spectrometry. The 1 H-NMR data showed that the metabolic changes of A549 cells are more remarkable than that of MRC5 cells and the effect of 5-FU on the A549 cells is the most distinct compared to other treatments. Heat map analysis showed that metabolic alterations under treatment of cytotoxic agents are totally different between normal and cancer cells. Multivariate analysis and weighted correlation network analysis (WGCNA) revealed a distinctive metabolite signature and hub metabolites. Two different analysis tools revealed that the changes of cell metabolism in response to cytotoxic agents were highly correlated with the Warburg effect and Reductive lipogenesis, two pathways having important effects on the cell survival. Taken together, our study addressed the correlation between the viability and metabolic profiles of MRC5 and A549 cells upon the treatment of cytotoxic anticancer agents.","PeriodicalId":17414,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Korean magnetic resonance society","volume":"21 1","pages":"31-43"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2017-03-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Korean magnetic resonance society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.6564/JKMRS.2017.21.1.031","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Together with radiotherapy, chemotherapy using cytotoxic agents is one of the most common therapies in cancer. Metabolic changes in cancer cells are drawing much attention recently, but the metabolic alterations by anticancer agents have not been much studied. Here, we investigated the effects of commonly used cytotoxic agents on lung normal cell MRC5 and lung cancer cell A549. We employed cis-plastin, doxorubicin, and 5-Fluorouracil and compared their effects on the viability and metabolism of the normal and cancer cell lines. We first established the concentration of the cytotoxic reagents that give differences in the viabilities of normal and cancer cell lines. In those conditions, the viability of A549 decreased significantly, whereas that of MRC5 remained unchanged. To study the metabolic alterations implicated in the viability differences, we obtained the metabolic profiles using 1 H-NMR spectrometry. The 1 H-NMR data showed that the metabolic changes of A549 cells are more remarkable than that of MRC5 cells and the effect of 5-FU on the A549 cells is the most distinct compared to other treatments. Heat map analysis showed that metabolic alterations under treatment of cytotoxic agents are totally different between normal and cancer cells. Multivariate analysis and weighted correlation network analysis (WGCNA) revealed a distinctive metabolite signature and hub metabolites. Two different analysis tools revealed that the changes of cell metabolism in response to cytotoxic agents were highly correlated with the Warburg effect and Reductive lipogenesis, two pathways having important effects on the cell survival. Taken together, our study addressed the correlation between the viability and metabolic profiles of MRC5 and A549 cells upon the treatment of cytotoxic anticancer agents.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
细胞毒性药物对正常细胞和癌细胞代谢谱的影响
与放射治疗一起,使用细胞毒性药物的化疗是癌症最常见的治疗方法之一。近年来,癌症细胞的代谢变化引起了人们的广泛关注,但抗癌药物引起的代谢变化尚未得到充分研究。在此,我们研究了常用的细胞毒性药物对肺正常细胞MRC5和癌症细胞A549的影响。我们使用了顺式普兰斯汀、阿霉素和5-氟尿嘧啶,并比较了它们对正常和癌症细胞系生存能力和代谢的影响。我们首先确定了细胞毒性试剂的浓度,这些试剂使正常和癌症细胞系的生存能力不同。在这些条件下,A549的活力显著降低,而MRC5的活力保持不变。为了研究与活力差异有关的代谢变化,我们使用1H-NMR光谱法获得了代谢谱。1H-NMR数据显示A549细胞的代谢变化比MRC5细胞更显著,并且5-FU对A549细胞产生的影响与其他处理相比最为明显。热图分析表明,在细胞毒性药物治疗下,正常细胞和癌症细胞的代谢变化完全不同。多变量分析和加权相关网络分析(WGCNA)揭示了一种独特的代谢产物特征和中枢代谢产物。两种不同的分析工具显示,细胞代谢对细胞毒性药物的反应变化与Warburg效应和还原性脂肪生成高度相关,这两种途径对细胞存活具有重要影响。总之,我们的研究探讨了MRC5和A549细胞在细胞毒性抗癌剂治疗后的生存能力和代谢谱之间的相关性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of the Korean magnetic resonance society
Journal of the Korean magnetic resonance society BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS-
自引率
66.70%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Backbone NMR chemical shift assignment of transthyretin Backbone NMR assignments of the FAS1-3/FAS1-4 domains of transforming growth factor-beta-induced protein The effects of Mozart's music on metabolic response upon stress Purity assessment using quantitative NMR: establishment of SI traceability in organic analysis Backbone NMR Assignments of WW2 domain from human AIP4
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1