Polyphenols quantification and antioxidant activity of methanolic and aqueous extracts from eight medicinal plants used to manage avian diseases in Burkina Faso

Windmi Kagambega, R. Meda, B. Koama, A. Drabo, H. Belem, D. Dabiré, J. Kaboré, A. Traore, G. Ouédraogo
{"title":"Polyphenols quantification and antioxidant activity of methanolic and aqueous extracts from eight medicinal plants used to manage avian diseases in Burkina Faso","authors":"Windmi Kagambega, R. Meda, B. Koama, A. Drabo, H. Belem, D. Dabiré, J. Kaboré, A. Traore, G. Ouédraogo","doi":"10.5897/JMPR2021.7105","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The present study aimed to quantify the polyphenols and evaluate the antioxidant activity of methanolic and aqueous extracts from eight medicinal plants used by the poultry farmers to manage avian diseases in Burkina Faso. Total phenolics and total flavonoids were quantified using Folin-Ciocalteu and AlCl3 reagents, respectively. The antioxidant activity was evaluated using three methods: 1,1-dipheenyl-2-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH), 2’-2-azino-bis (3-eethylbenzothiazoline-6-sulfonic acid (ABTS) and ferric reducing antioxidant power (FRAP). The results obtained showed that aqueous extracts contain more total phenolics than methanolic extracts in contrary to the total flavonoids where methanolic extracts presented the best contents. The evaluation of the antioxidant activity by the three methods showed that the extracts exhibited an interesting activity. The methanolic and the aqueous extracts of Parkia biglobosa, Sclerocarya birrea, and Detarium microcarpum, are distinguished by a good capacity to scavenge free DPPH radicals than those of the standards (trolox and quercetin). The methanolic extracts of all plant samples have shown their superiority in terms of their ability to scavenge the ABTS radical cations compared to aqueous extracts. Compared to other plant extracts and quercetin the methanolic and aqueous extracts of D. microcarpum bark presented the best reducing power with the values of 5360.23 and 4584.55 µmol EAA / g extract, respectively. These different results could justify the traditional uses of these plants in the treatment of avian pathologies. \n \n Key words: Medicinal plants, total phenolics, total flavonoids, antioxidant, poultry diseases.","PeriodicalId":16387,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Medicinal Plants Research","volume":"15 1","pages":"226-231"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-05-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Medicinal Plants Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5897/JMPR2021.7105","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

The present study aimed to quantify the polyphenols and evaluate the antioxidant activity of methanolic and aqueous extracts from eight medicinal plants used by the poultry farmers to manage avian diseases in Burkina Faso. Total phenolics and total flavonoids were quantified using Folin-Ciocalteu and AlCl3 reagents, respectively. The antioxidant activity was evaluated using three methods: 1,1-dipheenyl-2-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH), 2’-2-azino-bis (3-eethylbenzothiazoline-6-sulfonic acid (ABTS) and ferric reducing antioxidant power (FRAP). The results obtained showed that aqueous extracts contain more total phenolics than methanolic extracts in contrary to the total flavonoids where methanolic extracts presented the best contents. The evaluation of the antioxidant activity by the three methods showed that the extracts exhibited an interesting activity. The methanolic and the aqueous extracts of Parkia biglobosa, Sclerocarya birrea, and Detarium microcarpum, are distinguished by a good capacity to scavenge free DPPH radicals than those of the standards (trolox and quercetin). The methanolic extracts of all plant samples have shown their superiority in terms of their ability to scavenge the ABTS radical cations compared to aqueous extracts. Compared to other plant extracts and quercetin the methanolic and aqueous extracts of D. microcarpum bark presented the best reducing power with the values of 5360.23 and 4584.55 µmol EAA / g extract, respectively. These different results could justify the traditional uses of these plants in the treatment of avian pathologies. Key words: Medicinal plants, total phenolics, total flavonoids, antioxidant, poultry diseases.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
布基纳法索用于管理禽类疾病的八种药用植物的甲醇和水萃取物的多酚定量和抗氧化活性
本研究旨在量化布基纳法索家禽养殖户用于管理禽病的8种药用植物的甲醇提取物和水提取物的多酚并评估其抗氧化活性。用Folin-Ciocalteu和AlCl3试剂分别测定总酚和总黄酮含量。采用1,1-二苯基-2-吡啶肼(DPPH)、2 ' -2-氮基-双(3-乙基苯并噻唑-6-磺酸(ABTS)和铁还原抗氧化能力(FRAP)三种方法评价其抗氧化活性。结果表明,水提液中总酚类物质含量高于醇提液,而总黄酮含量以醇提液最高。三种方法对提取物的抗氧化活性进行了评价,结果表明提取物具有一定的抗氧化活性。与对照品(trolox和槲皮素)相比,大叶Parkia biglobosa、birclerocarya和Detarium microcarpum的甲醇和水提物具有较好的清除游离DPPH自由基的能力。与水提取物相比,所有植物样品的甲醇提取物在清除ABTS自由基阳离子方面显示出其优势。与其他植物提取物和槲皮素相比,微果皮醇提液和水提液的还原力最强,分别为5360.23µmol EAA / g和4584.55µmol EAA / g。这些不同的结果可以证明这些植物在禽类疾病治疗中的传统应用是合理的。关键词:药用植物,总酚类,总黄酮,抗氧化剂,家禽疾病
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
25
审稿时长
4.3 months
期刊最新文献
Productivity and picroside contents of Picrorhiza kurroa Royle ex Benth. cultivated at multi-locations in Uttarakhand, India Comprehensive evaluation of antiacne properties: HPLC analysis of crude extract from Aloe buettneri leaves against Cutibacterium acnes-induced acne Antimicrobial activities of the extract of shea tree (Vitellaria paradoxa Gaertn. F.) leaf and bark on some selected clinical pathogens Phytochemicals properties of Carica papaya Linn seeds essential oil and their antifungal and antibacterial activities Genipa americana fruit ethanolic extract in the control of environmental infecting agents
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1