Kelsey L. Griesheim, Richard L. Mulvaney, Tim J. Smith, Vander L. N. Nunes, Allan J. Hertzberger
{"title":"Isotopic comparison of ammonium and nitrate sources applied in-season to corn","authors":"Kelsey L. Griesheim, Richard L. Mulvaney, Tim J. Smith, Vander L. N. Nunes, Allan J. Hertzberger","doi":"10.1002/saj2.20531","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Most synthetic nitrogen (N) fertilizers used for corn (<i>Zea mays</i> L.) production supply ammonium (NH<sub>4</sub><sup>+</sup>), but N availability can be reduced by volatilization or microbial immobilization. The former process is eliminated and the latter reduced by fertilizing with nitrate (NO<sub>3</sub><sup>−</sup>), which is best done in-season to promote crop uptake while minimizing N loss by leaching or denitrification. To compare <sup>15</sup>N uptake for in-season surface applications of labeled potassium nitrate (KNO<sub>3</sub>), urea-ammonium nitrate (UAN), and urea, field studies were conducted in two growing seasons on Mollisols and Alfisols located in production fields under second- or third-year corn or a corn–soybean (<i>Glycine max</i> L. Merr.) rotation. In contrast to dry matter production and total N uptake, the three <sup>15</sup>N sources often differed significantly in N derived from the labeled fertilizer (NDF<sup>15</sup>F) and fertilizer <sup>15</sup>N uptake efficiency (F<sup>15</sup>NUE), both of which decreased in the order: KNO<sub>3</sub> > UAN > urea. As evidenced by a laboratory incubation study using the same three <sup>15</sup>N sources, this trend was attributed to differences in NH<sub>3</sub> volatilization and microbial immobilization that was greater for ammoniacal than NO<sub>3</sub><sup>−</sup> fertilizers. When surface applying a sidedressing to corn in the Midwestern United States, N uptake efficiency can be increased by the use of NO<sub>3</sub><sup>−</sup> fertilizers.</p>","PeriodicalId":101043,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings - Soil Science Society of America","volume":"87 3","pages":"555-571"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings - Soil Science Society of America","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/saj2.20531","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Most synthetic nitrogen (N) fertilizers used for corn (Zea mays L.) production supply ammonium (NH4+), but N availability can be reduced by volatilization or microbial immobilization. The former process is eliminated and the latter reduced by fertilizing with nitrate (NO3−), which is best done in-season to promote crop uptake while minimizing N loss by leaching or denitrification. To compare 15N uptake for in-season surface applications of labeled potassium nitrate (KNO3), urea-ammonium nitrate (UAN), and urea, field studies were conducted in two growing seasons on Mollisols and Alfisols located in production fields under second- or third-year corn or a corn–soybean (Glycine max L. Merr.) rotation. In contrast to dry matter production and total N uptake, the three 15N sources often differed significantly in N derived from the labeled fertilizer (NDF15F) and fertilizer 15N uptake efficiency (F15NUE), both of which decreased in the order: KNO3 > UAN > urea. As evidenced by a laboratory incubation study using the same three 15N sources, this trend was attributed to differences in NH3 volatilization and microbial immobilization that was greater for ammoniacal than NO3− fertilizers. When surface applying a sidedressing to corn in the Midwestern United States, N uptake efficiency can be increased by the use of NO3− fertilizers.
玉米(Zea mays L.)生产中使用的大多数合成氮肥提供铵(NH4+),但氮的有效性可能因挥发或微生物固定化而降低。通过施用硝态氮(NO3−)消除了前一种过程,减少了后一种过程,硝态氮最好在季节施肥,以促进作物吸收,同时最大限度地减少因淋溶或反硝化而造成的氮损失。为了比较当季施用标记硝酸钾(KNO3)、尿素-硝酸铵(UAN)和尿素对15N的吸收,本研究在2、3年玉米或玉米-大豆(Glycine max L. Merr.)轮作下,对生产地里的Mollisols和Alfisols进行了2个生长季节的田间研究。与干物质产量和全氮吸收相比,3种15N源从标记肥(NDF15F)和肥料15N吸收效率(F15NUE)中获得的氮素往往存在显著差异,其顺序依次递减:胡安在尿素。一项使用相同三种15N源的实验室培养研究表明,这种趋势归因于氨态肥料比NO3−肥料在NH3挥发和微生物固定化方面的差异。在美国中西部地区,在玉米表面施用侧施氮肥时,氮素的吸收效率可以通过施用NO3−肥料来提高。