Isotopic comparison of ammonium and nitrate sources applied in-season to corn

Kelsey L. Griesheim, Richard L. Mulvaney, Tim J. Smith, Vander L. N. Nunes, Allan J. Hertzberger
{"title":"Isotopic comparison of ammonium and nitrate sources applied in-season to corn","authors":"Kelsey L. Griesheim,&nbsp;Richard L. Mulvaney,&nbsp;Tim J. Smith,&nbsp;Vander L. N. Nunes,&nbsp;Allan J. Hertzberger","doi":"10.1002/saj2.20531","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Most synthetic nitrogen (N) fertilizers used for corn (<i>Zea mays</i> L.) production supply ammonium (NH<sub>4</sub><sup>+</sup>), but N availability can be reduced by volatilization or microbial immobilization. The former process is eliminated and the latter reduced by fertilizing with nitrate (NO<sub>3</sub><sup>−</sup>), which is best done in-season to promote crop uptake while minimizing N loss by leaching or denitrification. To compare <sup>15</sup>N uptake for in-season surface applications of labeled potassium nitrate (KNO<sub>3</sub>), urea-ammonium nitrate (UAN), and urea, field studies were conducted in two growing seasons on Mollisols and Alfisols located in production fields under second- or third-year corn or a corn–soybean (<i>Glycine max</i> L. Merr.) rotation. In contrast to dry matter production and total N uptake, the three <sup>15</sup>N sources often differed significantly in N derived from the labeled fertilizer (NDF<sup>15</sup>F) and fertilizer <sup>15</sup>N uptake efficiency (F<sup>15</sup>NUE), both of which decreased in the order: KNO<sub>3</sub> &gt; UAN &gt; urea. As evidenced by a laboratory incubation study using the same three <sup>15</sup>N sources, this trend was attributed to differences in NH<sub>3</sub> volatilization and microbial immobilization that was greater for ammoniacal than NO<sub>3</sub><sup>−</sup> fertilizers. When surface applying a sidedressing to corn in the Midwestern United States, N uptake efficiency can be increased by the use of NO<sub>3</sub><sup>−</sup> fertilizers.</p>","PeriodicalId":101043,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings - Soil Science Society of America","volume":"87 3","pages":"555-571"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings - Soil Science Society of America","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/saj2.20531","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Most synthetic nitrogen (N) fertilizers used for corn (Zea mays L.) production supply ammonium (NH4+), but N availability can be reduced by volatilization or microbial immobilization. The former process is eliminated and the latter reduced by fertilizing with nitrate (NO3), which is best done in-season to promote crop uptake while minimizing N loss by leaching or denitrification. To compare 15N uptake for in-season surface applications of labeled potassium nitrate (KNO3), urea-ammonium nitrate (UAN), and urea, field studies were conducted in two growing seasons on Mollisols and Alfisols located in production fields under second- or third-year corn or a corn–soybean (Glycine max L. Merr.) rotation. In contrast to dry matter production and total N uptake, the three 15N sources often differed significantly in N derived from the labeled fertilizer (NDF15F) and fertilizer 15N uptake efficiency (F15NUE), both of which decreased in the order: KNO3 > UAN > urea. As evidenced by a laboratory incubation study using the same three 15N sources, this trend was attributed to differences in NH3 volatilization and microbial immobilization that was greater for ammoniacal than NO3 fertilizers. When surface applying a sidedressing to corn in the Midwestern United States, N uptake efficiency can be increased by the use of NO3 fertilizers.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
当季应用于玉米的铵和硝源的同位素比较
玉米(Zea mays L.)生产中使用的大多数合成氮肥提供铵(NH4+),但氮的有效性可能因挥发或微生物固定化而降低。通过施用硝态氮(NO3−)消除了前一种过程,减少了后一种过程,硝态氮最好在季节施肥,以促进作物吸收,同时最大限度地减少因淋溶或反硝化而造成的氮损失。为了比较当季施用标记硝酸钾(KNO3)、尿素-硝酸铵(UAN)和尿素对15N的吸收,本研究在2、3年玉米或玉米-大豆(Glycine max L. Merr.)轮作下,对生产地里的Mollisols和Alfisols进行了2个生长季节的田间研究。与干物质产量和全氮吸收相比,3种15N源从标记肥(NDF15F)和肥料15N吸收效率(F15NUE)中获得的氮素往往存在显著差异,其顺序依次递减:胡安在尿素。一项使用相同三种15N源的实验室培养研究表明,这种趋势归因于氨态肥料比NO3−肥料在NH3挥发和微生物固定化方面的差异。在美国中西部地区,在玉米表面施用侧施氮肥时,氮素的吸收效率可以通过施用NO3−肥料来提高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Oxidation dynamics and leaching behavior of elemental sulfur fertilizers in tropical soils with contrasting textures Interactive effects of no-till, cereal rye, and softwood pine-derived biochar on soil health of a no-till northern soybean system Lignin-based amendments improve wheat growth and water use efficiency in acidic soils under deficit irrigation Effects of eucalyptus thinning on soil chemical attributes in an unfertilized silvopastoral system 6 years after thinning Repeated use of anion-exchange membranes in soils alters the membrane surface and phosphate-P exchange capacity
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1