Cultures of Taḥqīq between the Mongols, the Mughals, and the Mediterranean

IF 0.5 3区 历史学 Q1 HISTORY Journal of Early Modern History Pub Date : 2023-08-08 DOI:10.1163/15700658-bja10073
G. Casale
{"title":"Cultures of Taḥqīq between the Mongols, the Mughals, and the Mediterranean","authors":"G. Casale","doi":"10.1163/15700658-bja10073","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nAcross wide-ranging areas of Islamic thought, taḥqīq is an essential “way of knowing,” an epistemology broadly rooted in independent reasoning, empirical observation, openness to allegorical interpretation, and skepticism towards “received tradition.” Over the past few years, it has attracted the attention of an increasing number of scholars of both the Islamic Mediterranean and the Indo-Persian world, who have found taḥqīq to be a richly productive frame for re-interpreting and re-invigorating the study of intellectual, cultural, scientific, and literary life during the centuries stretching, roughly speaking, from around 1300 to around 1700. As they have done so, however, Mediterraneanists and Indo-Persianists have developed ways of conceptualizing taḥqīq that are vastly divergent – in some sense, even incommensurate. Against this background, the present collection of essays proposes a new, shared history of early modern taḥqīq as an epistemology of empire, with common origins in the Mongol conquests of the thirteenth century, and with ramifications stretching well into the era of European modernity.","PeriodicalId":44428,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Early Modern History","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Early Modern History","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/15700658-bja10073","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Across wide-ranging areas of Islamic thought, taḥqīq is an essential “way of knowing,” an epistemology broadly rooted in independent reasoning, empirical observation, openness to allegorical interpretation, and skepticism towards “received tradition.” Over the past few years, it has attracted the attention of an increasing number of scholars of both the Islamic Mediterranean and the Indo-Persian world, who have found taḥqīq to be a richly productive frame for re-interpreting and re-invigorating the study of intellectual, cultural, scientific, and literary life during the centuries stretching, roughly speaking, from around 1300 to around 1700. As they have done so, however, Mediterraneanists and Indo-Persianists have developed ways of conceptualizing taḥqīq that are vastly divergent – in some sense, even incommensurate. Against this background, the present collection of essays proposes a new, shared history of early modern taḥqīq as an epistemology of empire, with common origins in the Mongol conquests of the thirteenth century, and with ramifications stretching well into the era of European modernity.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
蒙古、莫卧儿和地中海之间的Taḥqīq文化
在伊斯兰思想的广泛领域,taḥqīq是一种重要的“认识方式”,是一种广泛植根于独立推理、实证观察、寓言解释开放和对“公认传统”持怀疑态度的认识论。在过去几年里,它吸引了越来越多的伊斯兰地中海和印度-波斯世界学者的注意,他们发现ḥqīq是一个富有成效的框架,可以重新解释和振兴从1300年左右到1700年左右的几个世纪里对知识、文化、科学和文学生活的研究。然而,正如他们所做的那样,地中海主义者和印度-波斯主义者已经发展出了将ta概念化的方法ḥqīq,在某种意义上甚至是不可通约的。在这种背景下,本散文集提出了一个新的、共享的早期现代ta历史ḥqīq是一种帝国的认识论,其共同起源于13世纪的蒙古征服,其分支可以延伸到欧洲现代性时代。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
23
期刊介绍: The early modern period of world history (ca. 1300-1800) was marked by a rapidly increasing level of global interaction. Between the aftermath of Mongol conquest in the East and the onset of industrialization in the West, a framework was established for new kinds of contacts and collective self-definition across an unprecedented range of human and physical geographies. The Journal of Early Modern History (JEMH), the official journal of the University of Minnesota Center for Early Modern History, is the first scholarly journal dedicated to the study of early modernity from this world-historical perspective, whether through explicitly comparative studies, or by the grouping of studies around a given thematic, chronological, or geographic frame.
期刊最新文献
Juan Rena and the Frontiers of Spanish Empire, 1500–1540, written by José M. Escribano-Páez Natural Things in Early Modern Worlds, edited by Mackenzie Cooley, Anna Toledano, and Duygu Yıldırım The Samurai and The Cross: The Jesuit Enterprise in Early Modern Japan, written by M. Antoni J. Ucerler Commercial Cosmopolitanism? Cross-Cultural Objects, Spaces and Institutions in the Early Modern World, edited by Felicia Gottmann Il chiaro e lo scuro: gli Africani nell’Europa del Rinascimento tra realtà e rappresentazione, edited by Gianfranco Salvatore
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1