{"title":"Cross-transfer of motor control in visuomotor tasks. Systematic review","authors":"Javier Ruiz-Seijoso, Y. Taboada-Iglesias","doi":"10.18176/archmeddeporte.00063","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: The term “cross-education” describes the perfomance improvement, both in motor control and strength, of a limb after training the opposite. Despite its current interest, there is no consensus on many concepts of the transfer of a visuomotor skill. The aim of the present research was to review the current literature on the phenomenon of cross-education in visuomotor skills in order to determine the magnitude of transference and its relationships with the context of the intervention. Results: A literature search was conducted during December 2019 in the databases Pubmed, CINAHL, MEDLINE, Web of Science, SPORTdiscus and Scopus. The descriptors “Motor ability” and “Motor skill” were used, in addition to the keywords “Motor control”, “skill”, “Task”, “cross over effect”, “cross exercise”, “contralateral learning”, “inter limb transfer “,” cross transfer “,” cross education “. After applying the inclusion and exclusion criteria, a total of 19 articles were obtained for analysis. Of these articles, 12 are RCTs, 4 crossover clinical trial, 2 are non-randomized trials and only 1 lacks a control group. Most of the articles consist of a short-term intervention. Only 5 studies are of a duration of between 4 and 6 weeks. Conclusion: the cross-education phenomenon occurs in visuomotor skills. However, the magnitude of transference and its relation to the amount of learning of the trained member seems to be very variable depending on the context of the intervention. Likewise, the scarce consensus and the methodological differences in the studies make it difficult to draw firm conclusions about the effects of the context on the transference.","PeriodicalId":38936,"journal":{"name":"Archivos de Medicina del Deporte","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archivos de Medicina del Deporte","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18176/archmeddeporte.00063","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Health Professions","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction: The term “cross-education” describes the perfomance improvement, both in motor control and strength, of a limb after training the opposite. Despite its current interest, there is no consensus on many concepts of the transfer of a visuomotor skill. The aim of the present research was to review the current literature on the phenomenon of cross-education in visuomotor skills in order to determine the magnitude of transference and its relationships with the context of the intervention. Results: A literature search was conducted during December 2019 in the databases Pubmed, CINAHL, MEDLINE, Web of Science, SPORTdiscus and Scopus. The descriptors “Motor ability” and “Motor skill” were used, in addition to the keywords “Motor control”, “skill”, “Task”, “cross over effect”, “cross exercise”, “contralateral learning”, “inter limb transfer “,” cross transfer “,” cross education “. After applying the inclusion and exclusion criteria, a total of 19 articles were obtained for analysis. Of these articles, 12 are RCTs, 4 crossover clinical trial, 2 are non-randomized trials and only 1 lacks a control group. Most of the articles consist of a short-term intervention. Only 5 studies are of a duration of between 4 and 6 weeks. Conclusion: the cross-education phenomenon occurs in visuomotor skills. However, the magnitude of transference and its relation to the amount of learning of the trained member seems to be very variable depending on the context of the intervention. Likewise, the scarce consensus and the methodological differences in the studies make it difficult to draw firm conclusions about the effects of the context on the transference.
简介:“交叉训练”一词描述的是肢体在运动控制和力量训练后的表现改善。尽管它目前的兴趣,没有共识的许多概念转移的视觉运动技能。本研究的目的是回顾目前关于视觉运动技能交叉教育现象的文献,以确定移情的大小及其与干预环境的关系。结果:2019年12月在Pubmed、CINAHL、MEDLINE、Web of Science、SPORTdiscus和Scopus数据库中进行了文献检索。除“运动控制”、“技能”、“任务”、“交叉效应”、“交叉练习”、“对侧学习”、“肢体间迁移”、“交叉迁移”、“交叉教育”等关键词外,还使用了“运动能力”、“运动技能”等描述词。应用纳入和排除标准后,共获得19篇文章进行分析。在这些文章中,12篇是随机对照试验,4篇是交叉临床试验,2篇是非随机试验,只有1篇没有对照组。大多数文章都包含短期干预。只有5项研究的持续时间在4到6周之间。结论:视觉运动技能存在交叉教育现象。然而,迁移的大小及其与被训练成员的学习量的关系似乎是非常可变的,这取决于干预的背景。同样,研究中缺乏共识和方法上的差异使得很难得出关于环境对迁移的影响的确切结论。