Applying technology acceptance model to Gauge University students’ perceptions of using blackboard in learning academic writing

IF 2.5 4区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Knowledge Management & E-Learning-An International Journal Pub Date : 2021-09-28 DOI:10.34105/j.kmel.2021.13.017
Mohammad H Alhumsi, Rasha A Alshaye
{"title":"Applying technology acceptance model to Gauge University students’ perceptions of using blackboard in learning academic writing","authors":"Mohammad H Alhumsi, Rasha A Alshaye","doi":"10.34105/j.kmel.2021.13.017","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Many higher educational institutions have adopted Learning Management Systems. Blackboard, characterized as one of the technological educational systems, is one of the leading and extensive Learning Management Systems adopted by most universities. However, literature showed that a missing link appears between Blackboard adoption and Blackboard poor usage in teaching and learning. Therefore, this study aims to gauge the perceptions of students toward using Blackboard Collaborate in learning English as a Foreign Language academic writing. Online survey was conducted and distributed to 248 respondents. This study is quantitative in nature, employing Technology Acceptance Model theory to check Learning Management System acceptance at Saudi Electronic University in Saudi Arabia. The findings showed that all the constructs were relatively strong and had positive relationships; they were correlated with each other and the whole six hypotheses were supported as well. In this paper, the proposed model indicates that Attitude toward Use is the strongest predictor of Behaviour Intention. This study offers implications for further studies.","PeriodicalId":45327,"journal":{"name":"Knowledge Management & E-Learning-An International Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Knowledge Management & E-Learning-An International Journal","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.34105/j.kmel.2021.13.017","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

Many higher educational institutions have adopted Learning Management Systems. Blackboard, characterized as one of the technological educational systems, is one of the leading and extensive Learning Management Systems adopted by most universities. However, literature showed that a missing link appears between Blackboard adoption and Blackboard poor usage in teaching and learning. Therefore, this study aims to gauge the perceptions of students toward using Blackboard Collaborate in learning English as a Foreign Language academic writing. Online survey was conducted and distributed to 248 respondents. This study is quantitative in nature, employing Technology Acceptance Model theory to check Learning Management System acceptance at Saudi Electronic University in Saudi Arabia. The findings showed that all the constructs were relatively strong and had positive relationships; they were correlated with each other and the whole six hypotheses were supported as well. In this paper, the proposed model indicates that Attitude toward Use is the strongest predictor of Behaviour Intention. This study offers implications for further studies.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
应用技术接受模型评估大学生在学术写作中使用黑板的感受
许多高等教育机构采用了学习管理系统。黑板作为一种技术教育系统,是大多数大学采用的领先且广泛的学习管理系统之一。然而,文献表明,黑板的采用和黑板在教学中的不良使用之间存在着缺失的联系。因此,本研究旨在衡量学生在学习英语作为外语学术写作时对使用黑板合作的看法。进行了在线调查,并向248名受访者分发。本研究是定量的,采用技术接受模型理论对沙特阿拉伯沙特电子大学的学习管理系统接受情况进行了检验。研究结果表明,所有的构造都相对较强,并且具有积极的关系;它们相互关联,整个六个假设也得到了支持。在本文中,所提出的模型表明,对使用的态度是行为意向的最强预测因子。这项研究为进一步的研究提供了启示。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
33.30%
发文量
19
审稿时长
25 weeks
期刊最新文献
A scoping review comparing different mapping approaches pointing to the need for standardizing concept maps in medical education: A preliminary analysis Analyzing the syntax and salience of causal links embedded within semantic links in concept maps: Implications for temporal flow and learning transfer Concept maps for formative assessment: Creation and implementation of an automatic and intelligent evaluation method Editorial: Concept mapping: Improving learning and understanding Improving learning and understanding through concept mapping
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1