In Memory of Paul Lippmann

IF 0.5 4区 心理学 Q4 PSYCHIATRY Contemporary Psychoanalysis Pub Date : 2022-01-02 DOI:10.1080/00107530.2022.2094720
M. Eagle
{"title":"In Memory of Paul Lippmann","authors":"M. Eagle","doi":"10.1080/00107530.2022.2094720","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Paul and I knew each other for more than 65 years and we were close friends for much of that time. Paul and his wife Fran have been not just family, but warm and generous family. There aren’t too many people, including good friends, one can feel free to call and say, “I want to come to Stockbridge and spend a few days with you,” and invariably receive “Of course” as a reply. It is difficult for me to write about Paul in any context other than that of a deep and loving friendship. So, I will write about Paul the person, the dear friend, more than Paul the author and psychoanalyst—although, of course, they are intertwined. I live in California. Therefore, much of our contact was by phone. During the last year of Paul’s life we spoke on the phone about three or four times a week. During that time, Paul’s remarkable courage in facing his deadly illness was matched by his continuing and undiminished zest for life. Although he did not deny death, he did not wait around for it. Virtually every time we spoke Paul would excitedly tell me about some new stimulating book or article he was reading or some interesting ideas with which he was playing. He was always enthusiastic and excited about something. Our conversations were not mainly about his illness and treatment. After Paul brought me up to date on these matters, we went on to talk about many things: ideas, projects, the latest joke, family news, and we engaged in playful zaniness. Playful. That is certainly a word that characterized Paul. If playfulness is a mark of a good life—and I think it is—Paul certainly knew how to lead a good life. I think Paul’s success as a therapist was, at least in part, attributable to his natural ability to be playful, to the freedom of his imagination.","PeriodicalId":46058,"journal":{"name":"Contemporary Psychoanalysis","volume":"58 1","pages":"134 - 136"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Contemporary Psychoanalysis","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00107530.2022.2094720","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Paul and I knew each other for more than 65 years and we were close friends for much of that time. Paul and his wife Fran have been not just family, but warm and generous family. There aren’t too many people, including good friends, one can feel free to call and say, “I want to come to Stockbridge and spend a few days with you,” and invariably receive “Of course” as a reply. It is difficult for me to write about Paul in any context other than that of a deep and loving friendship. So, I will write about Paul the person, the dear friend, more than Paul the author and psychoanalyst—although, of course, they are intertwined. I live in California. Therefore, much of our contact was by phone. During the last year of Paul’s life we spoke on the phone about three or four times a week. During that time, Paul’s remarkable courage in facing his deadly illness was matched by his continuing and undiminished zest for life. Although he did not deny death, he did not wait around for it. Virtually every time we spoke Paul would excitedly tell me about some new stimulating book or article he was reading or some interesting ideas with which he was playing. He was always enthusiastic and excited about something. Our conversations were not mainly about his illness and treatment. After Paul brought me up to date on these matters, we went on to talk about many things: ideas, projects, the latest joke, family news, and we engaged in playful zaniness. Playful. That is certainly a word that characterized Paul. If playfulness is a mark of a good life—and I think it is—Paul certainly knew how to lead a good life. I think Paul’s success as a therapist was, at least in part, attributable to his natural ability to be playful, to the freedom of his imagination.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
纪念保罗·李普曼
保罗和我认识超过65年了,在那段时间里,我们是亲密的朋友。保罗和他的妻子弗兰不仅仅是一个家庭,而是一个温暖而慷慨的家庭。没有多少人,包括好朋友在内,可以随意打电话说:“我想去斯托克布里奇和你呆几天”,然后总是得到“当然”的答复。对我来说,除了一段深厚而充满爱的友谊之外,很难在任何情况下描写保罗。所以,我会写保罗这个人,这个亲爱的朋友,而不是保罗作为作者和精神分析学家,当然,他们是交织在一起的。我住在加利福尼亚。因此,我们的大部分联系都是通过电话。在保罗生命的最后一年里,我们每周通三到四次电话。在那段时间里,保罗面对致命疾病的非凡勇气与他对生活的持续和不减的热情相匹配。虽然他不否认死亡,但他也没有坐等死亡。事实上,每次我们谈话时,保罗都会兴奋地告诉我他正在读的一些有趣的书或文章,或者他正在玩的一些有趣的想法。他总是对某事充满热情和兴奋。我们的谈话主要不是关于他的病情和治疗。在保罗把这些事情的最新情况告诉我之后,我们继续谈论很多事情:想法、项目、最新的笑话、家庭新闻,我们玩得很疯狂。好玩的。这当然是保罗的特点。如果爱玩是美好生活的标志——我认为是的——保罗当然知道如何过美好的生活。我认为保罗作为一名治疗师的成功,至少在一定程度上,要归功于他天生的玩乐能力,以及他想象力的自由。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
19
期刊最新文献
What Happens When We Talk to Each Other: Psychoanalytic Perspectives on Race and Other Difficult Conversations A Fresh Beginning to an Old Conversation: Thoughts on Leon Hoffman’s “We Don’t Trust YOU: Reflections on Anti-Racism in Psychoanalysis” Looking for Love in All the Wrong Places: Hatred as a Conflict Between Dependency and the Pseudo-Autonomous Self Surviving Hating and Being Hated On “Othering”
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1