Uji Validitas Konstruk dengan CFA dan Pelaporannya

Jahja Umar, Yunita Faela Nisa
{"title":"Uji Validitas Konstruk dengan CFA dan Pelaporannya","authors":"Jahja Umar, Yunita Faela Nisa","doi":"10.15408/jp3i.v9i2.16964","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) is the most reliable method of construct validity analysis in the fields of psychology, education and social sciences. From the author's observations on research articles as well as bachelor and graduate theses, and dissertations using CFA, it was found that there are a lot of misunderstandings and incompleteness in reporting CFA analysis. This paper is intended as an effort to improve this situation and provide recommendations in reporting data analysis using CFA. At the very least, this article is to show the important things that must be considered in understanding and using CFA and test theory in general.","PeriodicalId":34093,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Pengukuran Psikologi dan Pendidikan Indonesia","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-10-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"17","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal Pengukuran Psikologi dan Pendidikan Indonesia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15408/jp3i.v9i2.16964","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 17

Abstract

Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) is the most reliable method of construct validity analysis in the fields of psychology, education and social sciences. From the author's observations on research articles as well as bachelor and graduate theses, and dissertations using CFA, it was found that there are a lot of misunderstandings and incompleteness in reporting CFA analysis. This paper is intended as an effort to improve this situation and provide recommendations in reporting data analysis using CFA. At the very least, this article is to show the important things that must be considered in understanding and using CFA and test theory in general.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
CFA测试结构有效性及其报告
确证因素分析是心理学、教育学和社会科学领域中最可靠的结构有效性分析方法。从作者对研究文章、学士和研究生论文以及使用CFA的学位论文的观察中发现,在报告CFA分析时存在许多误解和不完整性。本文旨在努力改善这种情况,并在使用CFA报告数据分析时提供建议。至少,这篇文章是为了展示在理解和使用CFA和测试理论时必须考虑的重要事项。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
8
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊最新文献
Construct Validity of Posttraumatic Growth Inventory in the Context of the COVID-19 Pandemic Multidimensional Rasch Analysis of Gender Differences in Tes Intelegensi Kolektif Indonesia–Tinggi (TIKI-T) Adaptation and Validation of the Indonesian version of the Narcissistic Admiration and Rivalry Questionnaire The Development of Cyberbullying in Social Media Scale Metacognitive Skills Assessment in Research-Proposal Writing (MSARPW) in the Indonesian University Context: Scale Development and Validation Using Multidimensional Item Response Models
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1