Defending Europe from below: pro-European activism in Germany and the UK and its contribution to the politicisation of Europe

IF 2.2 1区 社会学 Q1 INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS Journal of European Integration Pub Date : 2023-06-09 DOI:10.1080/07036337.2023.2220073
Stijn van Kessel, Adam Fagan
{"title":"Defending Europe from below: pro-European activism in Germany and the UK and its contribution to the politicisation of Europe","authors":"Stijn van Kessel, Adam Fagan","doi":"10.1080/07036337.2023.2220073","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT The ‘politicisation of Europe’ has mainly been discussed with reference to Eurosceptic parties in the ‘conventional’ political arena. From the perspective of the anti-Brexit campaign in the UK and Pulse of Europe in Germany, this article focuses on grassroots pro-European mobilisation to explore the potential of politicisation ‘from below’. The two movements stood out in their ability to provoke considerable levels of grassroot mobilisation. We argue, however, that both movements reached a strategic impasse that was marked by a lack of clarity about their desired future of Europe, and which hampered their ability to generate political change. Our comparative analysis of campaign materials and interview data reveals that these movements struggled to articulate a) diagnostic frames that struck the right balance between problematising the current political situation whilst supporting the established order, and b) prognostic frames that extended much beyond the defence of the status quo (ante).","PeriodicalId":47516,"journal":{"name":"Journal of European Integration","volume":"45 1","pages":"971 - 993"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of European Integration","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/07036337.2023.2220073","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT The ‘politicisation of Europe’ has mainly been discussed with reference to Eurosceptic parties in the ‘conventional’ political arena. From the perspective of the anti-Brexit campaign in the UK and Pulse of Europe in Germany, this article focuses on grassroots pro-European mobilisation to explore the potential of politicisation ‘from below’. The two movements stood out in their ability to provoke considerable levels of grassroot mobilisation. We argue, however, that both movements reached a strategic impasse that was marked by a lack of clarity about their desired future of Europe, and which hampered their ability to generate political change. Our comparative analysis of campaign materials and interview data reveals that these movements struggled to articulate a) diagnostic frames that struck the right balance between problematising the current political situation whilst supporting the established order, and b) prognostic frames that extended much beyond the defence of the status quo (ante).
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
从下面保卫欧洲:德国和英国的亲欧行动主义及其对欧洲政治化的贡献
摘要“欧洲政治化”主要是指“传统”政治舞台上的疑欧派政党。从英国的反脱欧运动和德国的“欧洲脉搏”的角度来看,本文关注基层亲欧动员,以“从下面”探索政治化的潜力。这两个运动在激发相当程度的基层动员方面表现突出。然而,我们认为,这两个运动都陷入了战略僵局,其特点是对他们所期望的欧洲未来缺乏明确性,这阻碍了他们推动政治变革的能力。我们对竞选材料和采访数据的比较分析表明,这些运动很难阐明a)在解决当前政治局势问题的同时支持既定秩序之间取得正确平衡的诊断框架,以及b)远远超出维持现状(事前)的预测框架。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
6.90%
发文量
52
期刊最新文献
External shocks, policy spillovers, and veto players: (post)exceptionalist common agricultural policy and the case of the 2023-2027 reform The Roma and the double-movement of Social Europe Democracy and European Union: beyond the dichotomy The quiet politics of migration supranationalization – Commission entrepreneurship and the intra-Corporate Transferee Directive The COVID-19 pandemic and institutional change in the EU’s financial assistance regime: the governance of the Recovery and Resilience Facility (RRF)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1