Problems with a statement

Q2 Social Sciences First Amendment Studies Pub Date : 2020-07-02 DOI:10.1080/21689725.2020.1837653

Amardo Rodriguez

引用次数: 1

Abstract

ABSTRACT In this paper, I look critically at a recent statement put out by NCA’s Executive Committee on hate speech. Rather than promoting diversity and civility, I contend that this statement distorts and diminishes our understanding of communication, ultimately impeding the rise of new diversities and possibilities.

查看原文

微信好友朋友圈 QQ好友复制链接

本刊更多论文

语句的问题

摘要在本文中，我批判性地审视了NCA执行委员会最近发表的一份关于仇恨言论的声明。我认为，这种说法非但没有促进多样性和文明，反而扭曲和削弱了我们对沟通的理解，最终阻碍了新的多样性和可能性的兴起。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文去求助

来源期刊

First Amendment Studies Social Sciences-Law

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： First Amendment Studies publishes original scholarship on all aspects of free speech and embraces the full range of critical, historical, empirical, and descriptive methodologies. First Amendment Studies welcomes scholarship addressing areas including but not limited to: • doctrinal analysis of international and national free speech law and legislation • rhetorical analysis of cases and judicial rhetoric • theoretical and cultural issues related to free speech • the role of free speech in a wide variety of contexts (e.g., organizations, popular culture, traditional and new media).

期刊最新文献

The digital citizen as technoliberal subject: The politics of constitutive rhetoric in the European Union’s Digital Decade The Supreme Court’s rhetorical construction of home On the censoring of Dr. Ahlam Muhtaseb An accounting from Dr. Ahlam Muhtaseb The rhetoric of democracy in United States Senate campaign debates