A Short Version of the Big Five Inventory (BFI-20): Evidence on Construct Validity

Valdiney Veloso Gouveia, Rafaella de Carvalho Rodrigues Araújo, Isabel Cristina Vasconcelos de Oliveira, Marina Pereira Gonçalves, T. Milfont, Gabriel Lins de Holanda Coelho, W. Santos, Emerson Diógenes de Medeiros, Ana Karla Silva Soares, Renan Pereira Monteiro, Josemberg Moura de Andrade, Thiago Medeiros Cavalcanti, Bruna Da Silva Nascimento, R. Gouveia
{"title":"A Short Version of the Big Five Inventory (BFI-20): Evidence on Construct Validity","authors":"Valdiney Veloso Gouveia, Rafaella de Carvalho Rodrigues Araújo, Isabel Cristina Vasconcelos de Oliveira, Marina Pereira Gonçalves, T. Milfont, Gabriel Lins de Holanda Coelho, W. Santos, Emerson Diógenes de Medeiros, Ana Karla Silva Soares, Renan Pereira Monteiro, Josemberg Moura de Andrade, Thiago Medeiros Cavalcanti, Bruna Da Silva Nascimento, R. Gouveia","doi":"10.30849/RIPIJP.V55I1.1312","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Several measures were developed in the past decades to measure personality, focusing on the Big Five Factor Model (BFFM; Openness, Conscientiousness, Extraversion, Agreeableness, and Neuroticism). Despite the relevance of their findings in different countries, a shared limitation of such measures is their length, demanding time from researchers and participants, which might cause boredom or fatigue, biasing the final results. This research aimed to provide a shorter version for the 44-Item Big Five Inventory (BFI), through two studies (NTotal = 8,119). The structure was assessed using a range of techniques (e.g., PAF analysis, Procrustes rotation). The best 20 items (4 per factor) were chosen to compose the final version of the BFI-20, which presented suitable psychometric evidences across the samples. Thus, due the growing need for shorter measures without losing their psychometric quality, our findings indicate the adequacy of the 20-item BFI and its potential applicability in research context.","PeriodicalId":35206,"journal":{"name":"Interamerican Journal of Psychology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"10","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Interamerican Journal of Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30849/RIPIJP.V55I1.1312","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Psychology","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10

Abstract

Several measures were developed in the past decades to measure personality, focusing on the Big Five Factor Model (BFFM; Openness, Conscientiousness, Extraversion, Agreeableness, and Neuroticism). Despite the relevance of their findings in different countries, a shared limitation of such measures is their length, demanding time from researchers and participants, which might cause boredom or fatigue, biasing the final results. This research aimed to provide a shorter version for the 44-Item Big Five Inventory (BFI), through two studies (NTotal = 8,119). The structure was assessed using a range of techniques (e.g., PAF analysis, Procrustes rotation). The best 20 items (4 per factor) were chosen to compose the final version of the BFI-20, which presented suitable psychometric evidences across the samples. Thus, due the growing need for shorter measures without losing their psychometric quality, our findings indicate the adequacy of the 20-item BFI and its potential applicability in research context.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
五大量表(BFI-20)简版:构念有效性的证据
在过去的几十年里,人们开发了一些衡量人格的指标,重点是五大因素模型(BFFM;开放性、认真性、外向性、随和性和神经质)。尽管他们的研究结果在不同国家具有相关性,但这些措施的共同局限性是它们的长度,需要研究人员和参与者的时间,这可能会导致无聊或疲劳,从而使最终结果产生偏差。本研究旨在通过两项研究(NTotal=8119)为44项五大清单(BFI)提供一个较短的版本。使用一系列技术(如PAF分析、Procrustes旋转)对结构进行评估。选择最好的20个项目(每个因素4个)组成BFI-20的最终版本,该版本在样本中提供了合适的心理测量证据。因此,由于人们越来越需要在不丧失心理测量质量的情况下进行较短的测量,我们的研究结果表明了20项BFI的充分性及其在研究环境中的潜在适用性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Interamerican Journal of Psychology
Interamerican Journal of Psychology Psychology-Psychology (all)
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
24 weeks
期刊最新文献
Riesgos y salud ocupacional en el empleo público: Un análisis de perfiles psicosociales coexistentes Percepções das relações entre violência sexual e bullying a partir das vivências de adolescentes Influence of measurement type and the moment of occurrence of low performance behaviour's on task and citizenship performance appraisal Psicología y gamers profesionales en esports: análisis temático y agenda de investigación Like a Chameleon: Resilience among Self-Identified Latinx Mixed Adults
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1