7. Interest Groups, Advocacy, and Policy-Making

IF 1.1 3区社会学 Q3 POLITICAL SCIENCE British Politics Pub Date : 2021-12-21 DOI:10.1093/hepl/9780198840626.003.0007

P. John

引用次数: 0

Abstract

This chapter describes interest, pressure, or advocacy groups, which organize separately from political parties, seeking to influence public opinion and public policy. It discusses the nature of these groups and what they do, before reviewing the debate on the power of interest groups, in particular whether business has a privileged position. Studies of interest groups show the importance of these groups to the delivery of public policy, which reveals a two-way relationship between groups and the state. There is a complex pattern of governance that makes policy-making complicated and difficult terrain for governments or regional and local agencies. In today's turbulent politics, there is room for new advocacy groups to upset the equilibrium. The very unpredictability of the interest group world and the appearance of actors skilled in the use of social media may provide opportunities to influence the political agenda and to engage in more disruptive politics.

查看原文

微信好友朋友圈 QQ好友复制链接

本刊更多论文

7.利益集团、宣传和政策制定

本章描述了利益、压力或倡导团体，这些团体与政党分开组织，试图影响公众舆论和公共政策。它讨论了这些群体的性质及其行为，然后回顾了关于利益群体权力的辩论，特别是企业是否享有特权地位。对利益群体的研究表明，这些群体对公共政策实施的重要性，揭示了群体与国家之间的双向关系。有一种复杂的治理模式，使政府或地区和地方机构的决策变得复杂和困难。在当今动荡的政治中，新的倡导团体有打破平衡的空间。利益集团世界的不可预测性以及熟练使用社交媒体的行为者的出现，可能会为影响政治议程和参与更具破坏性的政治提供机会。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文去求助

来源期刊

British Politics POLITICAL SCIENCE-

CiteScore

2.40

自引率

9.10%

发文量

期刊介绍： British Politics offers the only forum explicitly designed to promote research in British political studies, and seeks to provide a counterweight to the growing fragmentation of this field during recent years. To this end, the journal aims to promote a more holistic understanding of British politics by encouraging a closer integration between theoretical and empirical research, between historical and contemporary analyses, and by fostering a conception of British politics as a broad and multi-disciplinary field of study. This incorporates a range of sub-fields, including psephology, policy analysis, regional studies, comparative politics, institutional analysis, political theory, political economy, historical analysis, cultural studies and social policy. While recognising the validity and the importance of research into specific aspects of British politics, the journal takes it to be a guiding principle that such research is more useful, and indeed meaningful, if it is related to the field of British politics in a broader and fuller sense. The scope of the journal will therefore be broad, incorporating a range of research papers and review articles from all theoretical perspectives, and on all aspects of British politics, including policy developments, institutional change and political behaviour. Priority will, however, be given to contributions which link contemporary developments in British politics to theoretical and/or historical analyses. The aim is as much to encourage the development of empirical research that is theoretically rigorous and informed, as it is to encourage the empirical application of theoretical work (or at least to encourage theorists to explicitly signify how their work could be applied in an empirical manner).