The Finnish Pain Questionnaire: comparison of descriptions of pain in coronary heart disease and low back pain.

H. Ketovuori, A. Kohvakka, H. Hurri, L. Eskelinen
{"title":"The Finnish Pain Questionnaire: comparison of descriptions of pain in coronary heart disease and low back pain.","authors":"H. Ketovuori, A. Kohvakka, H. Hurri, L. Eskelinen","doi":"10.2340/1650197784167176","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The verbal description of pain is the method most commonly used to study pain symptoms. The Finnish Pain Questionnaire has not been standardized yet. It is impossible to know which descriptors are typical of certain states of pain and which descriptors differentiate states of pain from each other. The aims of this study was to clarify if it is possible to differentiate pain descriptions for coronary heart disease from descriptions for low back pain using the Finnish Pain Questionnaire and to compare the use of pain descriptors and subclasses of descriptors. The patients comprised 57 male patients with coronary heart disease (mean age 52.9 years) and 60 female patients with low back pain (mean age 52.0 years). The results indicated that different descriptors are important in descriptions of coronary heart disease pain and low back pain. The differences of frequencies in the use of descriptors were statistically significant. There were also significant differences in the use of descriptors from different subclasses of the sensory dimension, according to the mechanisms of pain. The results indicated that it is possible to find out which descriptors are the most important for different states of pain and that the Finnish Pain Questionnaire can be a valid method for describing different states of pain.","PeriodicalId":76523,"journal":{"name":"Scandinavian journal of rehabilitation medicine","volume":"16 2 1","pages":"71-6"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scandinavian journal of rehabilitation medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2340/1650197784167176","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

The verbal description of pain is the method most commonly used to study pain symptoms. The Finnish Pain Questionnaire has not been standardized yet. It is impossible to know which descriptors are typical of certain states of pain and which descriptors differentiate states of pain from each other. The aims of this study was to clarify if it is possible to differentiate pain descriptions for coronary heart disease from descriptions for low back pain using the Finnish Pain Questionnaire and to compare the use of pain descriptors and subclasses of descriptors. The patients comprised 57 male patients with coronary heart disease (mean age 52.9 years) and 60 female patients with low back pain (mean age 52.0 years). The results indicated that different descriptors are important in descriptions of coronary heart disease pain and low back pain. The differences of frequencies in the use of descriptors were statistically significant. There were also significant differences in the use of descriptors from different subclasses of the sensory dimension, according to the mechanisms of pain. The results indicated that it is possible to find out which descriptors are the most important for different states of pain and that the Finnish Pain Questionnaire can be a valid method for describing different states of pain.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
芬兰疼痛问卷:冠心病和腰痛患者疼痛描述的比较。
对疼痛的口头描述是研究疼痛症状最常用的方法。芬兰疼痛问卷尚未标准化。不可能知道哪些描述符是某些疼痛状态的典型描述符,以及哪些描述符将疼痛状态彼此区分开来。本研究的目的是阐明是否可以使用芬兰疼痛问卷将冠心病的疼痛描述与腰痛的描述区分开来,并比较疼痛描述符和描述符子类的使用。患者包括57名男性冠心病患者(平均年龄52.9岁)和60名女性腰痛患者(平均岁52.0岁)。结果表明,不同的描述符在描述冠心病疼痛和腰痛时很重要。描述符使用频率的差异具有统计学意义。根据疼痛的机制,感觉维度的不同子类的描述符的使用也存在显著差异。结果表明,可以找出哪些描述符对不同的疼痛状态最重要,芬兰疼痛问卷可以成为描述不同疼痛状态的有效方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A prospective study of low back pain in a general population. III. Medical service--work consequence. Rehabilitation after myocardial infarction. A controlled study. Growth hormone and periarticular new bone formation--a causal relationship? A preliminary communication. The etiology and conservative treatment of humeral epicondylitis. Effects of comprehensive rehabilitation on weight reduction in myocardial infarction patients.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1