The relative importance of gestational weight gain and pre-gestational diabetes on perinatal outcomes: A retrospective cohort study

IF 1 Q4 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM Diabetes epidemiology and management Pub Date : 2022-10-01 DOI:10.1016/j.deman.2022.100095
Karen Wong , Stephanie Gill , Phil Murphy , Joan Crane
{"title":"The relative importance of gestational weight gain and pre-gestational diabetes on perinatal outcomes: A retrospective cohort study","authors":"Karen Wong ,&nbsp;Stephanie Gill ,&nbsp;Phil Murphy ,&nbsp;Joan Crane","doi":"10.1016/j.deman.2022.100095","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Aims</h3><p>The objective of this study is to determine the risks of macrosomia, LGA, and Caesarean section associated with a diagnosis of pre-gestational diabetes or gestational weight gain.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>This is a retrospective cohort study utilizing data from the Perinatal Surveillance Database of Newfoundland &amp; Labrador from 2001 – 2020. Multivariate logistic regression analyses were used to determine odds ratios (OR) associated with GWG and pre-gestational diabetes for the outcomes macrosomia, LGA, and CS, while controlling for other known risk factors.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>There were 234 pregnancies complicated by pre-gestational diabetes and 22,048 without diabetes included. There was no significant difference in absolute GWG between groups (15.2 kg vs. 15.5 kg, <em>p</em> = 0.12), however more women with pre-gestational diabetes had excessive GWG (85.1% vs. 78.5%, <em>p</em> = 0.04). Pre-gestational diabetes was a significant predictor of LGA (OR 5.21, 95% CI 3.96 – 6.87), macrosomia (OR 2.63 95% CI 1.98 – 3.48), and Caesarean section (OR 3.44, 95% CI 2.60 – 4.56). The OR associated with excessive GWG were lower for these same outcomes (LGA OR 2.73, 95% CI 2.40 – 3.11; macrosomia 2.38, 95% CI 2.12 – 2.69; Caesarean section OR 1.29, 95% CI 1.19 – 1.39).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>We have identified that pre-gestational diabetes is the most significant risk factor for poor outcomes such as LGA, macrosomia, and Caesarean section, although excessive GWG also plays a role.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":72796,"journal":{"name":"Diabetes epidemiology and management","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666970622000452/pdfft?md5=7dec95b2b88ab6c4751a552549a55b97&pid=1-s2.0-S2666970622000452-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diabetes epidemiology and management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666970622000452","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aims

The objective of this study is to determine the risks of macrosomia, LGA, and Caesarean section associated with a diagnosis of pre-gestational diabetes or gestational weight gain.

Methods

This is a retrospective cohort study utilizing data from the Perinatal Surveillance Database of Newfoundland & Labrador from 2001 – 2020. Multivariate logistic regression analyses were used to determine odds ratios (OR) associated with GWG and pre-gestational diabetes for the outcomes macrosomia, LGA, and CS, while controlling for other known risk factors.

Results

There were 234 pregnancies complicated by pre-gestational diabetes and 22,048 without diabetes included. There was no significant difference in absolute GWG between groups (15.2 kg vs. 15.5 kg, p = 0.12), however more women with pre-gestational diabetes had excessive GWG (85.1% vs. 78.5%, p = 0.04). Pre-gestational diabetes was a significant predictor of LGA (OR 5.21, 95% CI 3.96 – 6.87), macrosomia (OR 2.63 95% CI 1.98 – 3.48), and Caesarean section (OR 3.44, 95% CI 2.60 – 4.56). The OR associated with excessive GWG were lower for these same outcomes (LGA OR 2.73, 95% CI 2.40 – 3.11; macrosomia 2.38, 95% CI 2.12 – 2.69; Caesarean section OR 1.29, 95% CI 1.19 – 1.39).

Conclusions

We have identified that pre-gestational diabetes is the most significant risk factor for poor outcomes such as LGA, macrosomia, and Caesarean section, although excessive GWG also plays a role.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
妊娠期体重增加和妊娠前糖尿病对围产期结局的相对重要性:一项回顾性队列研究
目的本研究的目的是确定巨大儿、LGA和剖腹产的风险与孕前糖尿病或妊娠期体重增加的诊断相关。方法回顾性队列研究利用纽芬兰围产期监测数据库的数据;2001 - 2020年的拉布拉多。在控制其他已知危险因素的同时,采用多因素logistic回归分析确定与GWG和孕前糖尿病相关的巨大儿、LGA和CS的比值比(OR)。结果234例妊娠合并妊娠前糖尿病,22048例未合并妊娠糖尿病。绝对GWG在两组间无显著差异(15.2 kg对15.5 kg, p = 0.12),但更多的妊娠前糖尿病妇女GWG过高(85.1%对78.5%,p = 0.04)。妊娠前糖尿病是LGA (OR 5.21, 95% CI 3.96 - 6.87)、巨大儿(OR 2.63, 95% CI 1.98 - 3.48)和剖宫产(OR 3.44, 95% CI 2.60 - 4.56)的重要预测因子。在这些相同的结果中,与过量GWG相关的OR较低(LGA OR 2.73, 95% CI 2.40 - 3.11;巨大儿2.38,95% CI 2.12 - 2.69;剖宫产(OR 1.29, 95% CI 1.19 - 1.39)。结论妊娠前期糖尿病是LGA、巨大儿和剖宫产等不良结局的最重要危险因素,尽管GWG过高也起一定作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Diabetes epidemiology and management
Diabetes epidemiology and management Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, Public Health and Health Policy
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
14 days
期刊最新文献
Assessment of vitamin D status in obese and non-obese patients: A case-control study The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on diabetes-related mortality Diabetes in pregnancy: Anxious minds precarious times Primary care monitoring of HbA1c tests in type 2 diabetic patients in Northern France and impact of the successive COVID-19 pandemic containments Evaluation of a Support Tool for Diabetes Control in primary care – A Qualitative study with primary care staff
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1