Long COVID – respiratory symptoms in non-hospitalised subjects – a cross-sectional study

IF 1.5 Q3 REHABILITATION European Journal of Physiotherapy Pub Date : 2022-08-01 DOI:10.1080/21679169.2022.2101692
M. Fagevik Olsén, L. Lannefors, M. Nygren-Bonnier, E. Johansson
{"title":"Long COVID – respiratory symptoms in non-hospitalised subjects – a cross-sectional study","authors":"M. Fagevik Olsén, L. Lannefors, M. Nygren-Bonnier, E. Johansson","doi":"10.1080/21679169.2022.2101692","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Background The aim of this study was to describe and analyse the variety of respiratory appearances in Long COVID subjects who were not hospitalised during the acute phase of the infection. Methods A consecutive series of 60 subjects participated 10.8 months (SD 4.5) after the acute phase of the infection. Respiratory function was tested concerning lung volumes, expiratory flow, muscle strength, physical capacity including concurrent oxygen saturation, chest expansion, lung sounds, pain and breathing pattern. Differences between those with or without positive test and duration of symptoms more or less than 6 months were analysed with T-test, Chi-square test and Fisher’s exact test. Results Decreased forced vital capacity was found in 6/60 (10%), and forced expiratory volume in 1 s and 7/60 (12%), low maximal inspiratory pressure in 38/58 (54%) and low maximal expiratory pressure in 10/58 (17%). Decreased physical capacity was registered in 36/52 (69%), and thoracic expansion in 26/46 (56%). Pathologic lung sounds had 15/58 (26%) and six patients desaturated during the test of physical capacity. A majority (36/58, 67%) presented pain in the ribcage. All but three patients (95%) showed a dysfunctional breathing pattern in sitting and standing. Only poor and fair correlations were found between age, duration and level of physical capacity compared to spirometry, respiratory muscle strength and thoracic expansion. Conclusion Abnormal breathing pattern and respiratory movements as well as pain, and reduced lung volumes, flow, respiratory muscle strength, physical capacity and thoracic expansion may be involved in Long COVID. The breathing symptoms should therefore be looked for in a wider picture beyond spirometry and oximetry.","PeriodicalId":45694,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Physiotherapy","volume":"25 1","pages":"283 - 290"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Physiotherapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/21679169.2022.2101692","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Abstract Background The aim of this study was to describe and analyse the variety of respiratory appearances in Long COVID subjects who were not hospitalised during the acute phase of the infection. Methods A consecutive series of 60 subjects participated 10.8 months (SD 4.5) after the acute phase of the infection. Respiratory function was tested concerning lung volumes, expiratory flow, muscle strength, physical capacity including concurrent oxygen saturation, chest expansion, lung sounds, pain and breathing pattern. Differences between those with or without positive test and duration of symptoms more or less than 6 months were analysed with T-test, Chi-square test and Fisher’s exact test. Results Decreased forced vital capacity was found in 6/60 (10%), and forced expiratory volume in 1 s and 7/60 (12%), low maximal inspiratory pressure in 38/58 (54%) and low maximal expiratory pressure in 10/58 (17%). Decreased physical capacity was registered in 36/52 (69%), and thoracic expansion in 26/46 (56%). Pathologic lung sounds had 15/58 (26%) and six patients desaturated during the test of physical capacity. A majority (36/58, 67%) presented pain in the ribcage. All but three patients (95%) showed a dysfunctional breathing pattern in sitting and standing. Only poor and fair correlations were found between age, duration and level of physical capacity compared to spirometry, respiratory muscle strength and thoracic expansion. Conclusion Abnormal breathing pattern and respiratory movements as well as pain, and reduced lung volumes, flow, respiratory muscle strength, physical capacity and thoracic expansion may be involved in Long COVID. The breathing symptoms should therefore be looked for in a wider picture beyond spirometry and oximetry.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
长期COVID -非住院受试者的呼吸道症状-一项横断面研究
摘要背景本研究的目的是描述和分析在感染急性期未住院的Long COVID受试者的各种呼吸道表现。方法连续60名受试者参加10.8 感染急性期后数月(SD 4.5)。呼吸功能测试包括肺容量、呼气流量、肌肉力量、体力,包括同时血氧饱和度、胸部扩张、肺部声音、疼痛和呼吸模式。用T检验、卡方检验和Fisher精确检验分析了阳性或非阳性者与症状持续时间大于或小于6个月之间的差异。结果用力肺活量下降6例(10%),用力呼气量下降1例 s和7/60(12%)、38/58为低最大吸气压(54%)和10/58为低最大呼气压(17%)。36/52例(69%)出现体力下降,26/46例(56%)出现胸腔扩张。病理性肺部声音有15/58(26%),6名患者在体能测试中不饱和。大多数(36/58,67%)表现为胸腔疼痛。除三名患者(95%)外,其余患者在坐姿和站立时均表现出呼吸功能紊乱。与肺活量测定、呼吸肌肉力量和胸廓扩张相比,年龄、持续时间和体力水平之间的相关性较差且尚可。结论长期新冠肺炎可能与呼吸方式和呼吸运动异常、疼痛、肺容量、流量、呼吸肌力量、体力和胸廓扩张减少有关。因此,呼吸症状应该在肺活量测定和血氧测定之外的更广泛的范围内寻找。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
29
期刊最新文献
Utilisation of the Hip Disability and Knee Injury Osteoarthritis Outcome Score in physiotherapy following total hip and knee arthroplasty: a cross-sectional survey. Unravelling the digital competence of students in physiotherapy education through the European digital competence framework Complementary strategies to improve the qualitative analysis: exemplified by our studies of physiotherapy in shoulder problems Beyond one size fits All - Personalised prevention strategies using physical activity: editorial Comparing treadmill and overground versions of the two-minute walk test in people with low back pain
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1