Predictors of Recurrence of Peritoneal Carcinomatosis among Patients with Colorectal Cancer Following Cytoreductive Surgery alone versus Cytoreductive Surgery Plus HIPEC

Q4 Medicine Journal of Coloproctology Pub Date : 2022-06-01 DOI:10.1055/s-0041-1740472
W. Gareer, G. Mohamed, M. Zedan, Tarek Sherif Al Baradei, S. Abdalgeleel, S. Khairallah
{"title":"Predictors of Recurrence of Peritoneal Carcinomatosis among Patients with Colorectal Cancer Following Cytoreductive Surgery alone versus Cytoreductive Surgery Plus HIPEC","authors":"W. Gareer, G. Mohamed, M. Zedan, Tarek Sherif Al Baradei, S. Abdalgeleel, S. Khairallah","doi":"10.1055/s-0041-1740472","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Background Peritoneal carcinomatosis (PC) is a lethal regional progression in patients with colorectal cancer (CRC). Treatment with complete cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) achieves better local control than systemic palliative chemotherapy.\n Objectives To assess the efficacy on the prognosis of CRS and HIPEC compared with CRS only and to identify possible clinicopathological factors associated with the recurrence of PC.\n Methods The present retrospective study included all colorectal carcinoma cases with PC subjected to CRS with or without HIPC from January 2009 to June 2018 at the National Cancer Institute (NCI), Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt. The outcome is evaluated in terms of recurrence-free survival (RFS) and its predictors.\n Results Out of the 61 patients, 45 patients (73.8%) underwent CRS plus HIPEC, and 16 (26.2%) underwent CRS alone. The 1-year RFS was 55.7%, with a median of 12 months. The risk factors for recurrence identified in the univariate analysis were T4 primary tumor, high-grade, positive lymphovascular invasion (LVI), positive extracapsular nodal spread, and patients treated with CRS only, without HIPEC. In the multivariate analysis, the independent risk factors for recurrence were high grade and patients treated with CRS only.\n Conclusion T4 primary tumor, high grade, positive LVI, and positive extracapsular nodal spread seemed to be important predictors of recurrence following the treatment of PC. Our study also demonstrated that the addition of HIPEC to CRS improved the RFS.","PeriodicalId":15408,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Coloproctology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Coloproctology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0041-1740472","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background Peritoneal carcinomatosis (PC) is a lethal regional progression in patients with colorectal cancer (CRC). Treatment with complete cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) achieves better local control than systemic palliative chemotherapy. Objectives To assess the efficacy on the prognosis of CRS and HIPEC compared with CRS only and to identify possible clinicopathological factors associated with the recurrence of PC. Methods The present retrospective study included all colorectal carcinoma cases with PC subjected to CRS with or without HIPC from January 2009 to June 2018 at the National Cancer Institute (NCI), Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt. The outcome is evaluated in terms of recurrence-free survival (RFS) and its predictors. Results Out of the 61 patients, 45 patients (73.8%) underwent CRS plus HIPEC, and 16 (26.2%) underwent CRS alone. The 1-year RFS was 55.7%, with a median of 12 months. The risk factors for recurrence identified in the univariate analysis were T4 primary tumor, high-grade, positive lymphovascular invasion (LVI), positive extracapsular nodal spread, and patients treated with CRS only, without HIPEC. In the multivariate analysis, the independent risk factors for recurrence were high grade and patients treated with CRS only. Conclusion T4 primary tumor, high grade, positive LVI, and positive extracapsular nodal spread seemed to be important predictors of recurrence following the treatment of PC. Our study also demonstrated that the addition of HIPEC to CRS improved the RFS.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
癌症大肠癌患者单纯细胞减灭术与细胞减灭加HIPEC术后腹膜癌复发的预测因素
腹膜癌(PC)是结直肠癌(CRC)患者中一种致命的局部进展。与全身姑息性化疗相比,采用完全细胞减缩手术(CRS)和腹腔热化疗(HIPEC)治疗可获得更好的局部控制。目的评价CRS联合HIPEC与单纯CRS相比对预后的影响,探讨可能与PC复发相关的临床病理因素。方法本回顾性研究包括2009年1月至2018年6月在埃及开罗大学国家癌症研究所(NCI)接受CRS治疗的所有伴有或不伴有HIPC的结直肠癌PC病例。结果是根据无复发生存(RFS)及其预测因子来评估的。结果61例患者中,45例(73.8%)行CRS + HIPEC, 16例(26.2%)行CRS。1年RFS为55.7%,中位为12个月。在单因素分析中确定的复发危险因素是T4原发肿瘤、高级别、淋巴血管侵袭(LVI)阳性、囊外淋巴结扩散阳性以及仅接受CRS治疗而未接受HIPEC治疗的患者。在多因素分析中,复发的独立危险因素为高级别和仅接受CRS治疗的患者。结论T4原发肿瘤、高分级、LVI阳性和囊外淋巴结阳性扩散可能是前列腺癌治疗后复发的重要预测因素。我们的研究还表明,在CRS中加入HIPEC可以改善RFS。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Coloproctology
Journal of Coloproctology Medicine-Gastroenterology
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
41
审稿时长
47 weeks
期刊最新文献
Evaluation of Salvia officinalis in the Treatment of Acetic Acid-Induced Ulcerative Colitis in a Rat Model Unusual Case of Colonic Intussusception Caused by Angiolipoma: Case Report and Literature Review Vegetating Lesions that Appear in the Scar after Neoadjuvant Therapy for Rectal Tumors: Tumor Regrowth or Benign Neoplasm? Retrospective Study of Patients Submitted to Appendectomy in a Tertiary Hospital: Is There a Difference between the Public and Supplementary Health System? Pilonidal Sinus of the Anal Canal: A Rare Entity - Case Report
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1