Employer Concerns and Responses to an Aging Workforce

Q4 Economics, Econometrics and Finance Journal of Retirement Pub Date : 2019-02-01 DOI:10.3905/JOR.2019.1.049
R. Clark, Steven A. Nyce, Beth M. Ritter, J. Shoven
{"title":"Employer Concerns and Responses to an Aging Workforce","authors":"R. Clark, Steven A. Nyce, Beth M. Ritter, J. Shoven","doi":"10.3905/JOR.2019.1.049","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Economists and public policy analysts have devoted considerable research to examining the work and retirement decisions of employees. Much less effort has been spent on understanding the concerns and challenges of employers if their workers delay retirement and remain on the job until older ages. In this study, we report findings from three employer surveys with the objective of learning how organizations are responding to the aging of their workforces. The surveys provide several important observations. First, employer concerns about workforce aging vary considerably across the economy. To some firms, these demographic changes are of immediate concern and are viewed as a significant risk to the organization, while other firms remain more concerned about the potential productivity and cost effect of an older labor force. Second, most employers expect the importance of workforce aging to increase in the next five years. In response, a significant proportion of organizations are making changes to working conditions and compensation policies. Third, firms remain reluctant to adopt formal phased retirement policies but are more willing to offer part-time employment, return to work, and other policies on a case-by-case basis. TOPICS: Retirement, legal/regulatory/public policy","PeriodicalId":36429,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Retirement","volume":"6 1","pages":"82 - 99"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"12","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Retirement","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3905/JOR.2019.1.049","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 12

Abstract

Economists and public policy analysts have devoted considerable research to examining the work and retirement decisions of employees. Much less effort has been spent on understanding the concerns and challenges of employers if their workers delay retirement and remain on the job until older ages. In this study, we report findings from three employer surveys with the objective of learning how organizations are responding to the aging of their workforces. The surveys provide several important observations. First, employer concerns about workforce aging vary considerably across the economy. To some firms, these demographic changes are of immediate concern and are viewed as a significant risk to the organization, while other firms remain more concerned about the potential productivity and cost effect of an older labor force. Second, most employers expect the importance of workforce aging to increase in the next five years. In response, a significant proportion of organizations are making changes to working conditions and compensation policies. Third, firms remain reluctant to adopt formal phased retirement policies but are more willing to offer part-time employment, return to work, and other policies on a case-by-case basis. TOPICS: Retirement, legal/regulatory/public policy
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
雇主对劳动力老龄化的关注和回应
经济学家和公共政策分析师投入了大量的研究来考察雇员的工作和退休决定。在理解如果员工推迟退休并继续工作到更老的年龄,雇主的担忧和挑战方面,付出的努力要少得多。在本研究中,我们报告了三个雇主调查的结果,目的是了解组织如何应对劳动力老龄化。这些调查提供了几个重要的观察结果。首先,各个经济体的雇主对劳动力老龄化的担忧差异很大。对一些公司来说,这些人口结构的变化是迫在眉睫的问题,被视为对组织的重大风险,而其他公司仍然更关心老年劳动力的潜在生产力和成本效应。其次,大多数雇主预计劳动力老龄化的重要性将在未来五年内增加。作为回应,相当大比例的组织正在改变工作条件和补偿政策。第三,企业仍然不愿意采用正式的分阶段退休政策,但更愿意根据具体情况提供兼职、重返工作岗位和其他政策。主题:退休,法律/监管/公共政策
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Retirement
Journal of Retirement Economics, Econometrics and Finance-Finance
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
27
期刊最新文献
The Impact of Investment Restrictions on Pension Participants: A Case Study of Nigeria Editor’s Letter The Role of Annuities in Managing Sequence of Returns Risk Approaching and in Retirement guest commentary Valuation of Financial Decision-Making Retirement Planning, Retirement Insecurity, and Financial Satisfaction
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1