Crime Reporting in Chicago: A Comparison of Police and Victim Survey Data, 1999–2018

IF 2.2 1区 社会学 Q1 CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency Pub Date : 2022-05-11 DOI:10.1177/00224278221098053
Maribeth L. Rezey, Janet L. Lauritsen
{"title":"Crime Reporting in Chicago: A Comparison of Police and Victim Survey Data, 1999–2018","authors":"Maribeth L. Rezey, Janet L. Lauritsen","doi":"10.1177/00224278221098053","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objectives A critical unknown in any jurisdiction is the scope of crime that is not brought to the attention of police. This study provides a unique comparison of Chicago crime rates using both police and victimization survey data. Levels of crime reporting and the reasons victims provide for or against reporting crime to the police are examined. Patterns are compared to those found for other large U.S. cities. Methods Data for Chicago residents from the National Crime Victimization Survey (NCVS) are used to estimate serious violence and burglary rates, levels of reporting to the police, and residents’ justifications for reporting or not reporting. Levels and trends in NCVS and Chicago Police Department rates of serious violence and burglary are compared. Results The NCVS data show that while Chicago residents typically experience higher rates of these crimes than residents of other large cities, they report these crimes to the police at mostly similar rates. Reasons for and against reporting these crimes to the police are generally similar to victims elsewhere. Conclusions Despite a documented history of distrust in the police, Chicago residents do not appear to have notably lower rates of reporting serious violence or burglary to the police than residents of other large cities.","PeriodicalId":51395,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency","volume":"60 1","pages":"664 - 699"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00224278221098053","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Objectives A critical unknown in any jurisdiction is the scope of crime that is not brought to the attention of police. This study provides a unique comparison of Chicago crime rates using both police and victimization survey data. Levels of crime reporting and the reasons victims provide for or against reporting crime to the police are examined. Patterns are compared to those found for other large U.S. cities. Methods Data for Chicago residents from the National Crime Victimization Survey (NCVS) are used to estimate serious violence and burglary rates, levels of reporting to the police, and residents’ justifications for reporting or not reporting. Levels and trends in NCVS and Chicago Police Department rates of serious violence and burglary are compared. Results The NCVS data show that while Chicago residents typically experience higher rates of these crimes than residents of other large cities, they report these crimes to the police at mostly similar rates. Reasons for and against reporting these crimes to the police are generally similar to victims elsewhere. Conclusions Despite a documented history of distrust in the police, Chicago residents do not appear to have notably lower rates of reporting serious violence or burglary to the police than residents of other large cities.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
芝加哥的犯罪报告:1999-2008年警方和受害者调查数据的比较
目标在任何司法管辖区,一个关键的未知数是没有引起警方注意的犯罪范围。这项研究利用警方和受害调查数据对芝加哥的犯罪率进行了独特的比较。审查了犯罪报告的水平以及受害者支持或反对向警方报告犯罪的原因。将模式与美国其他大城市的模式进行比较。方法使用来自全国犯罪受害者调查(NCVS)的芝加哥居民数据来估计严重暴力和入室盗窃的发生率、向警方报案的程度以及居民报案或不报案的理由。比较了NCVS和芝加哥警察局严重暴力和入室盗窃率的水平和趋势。结果NCVS的数据显示,虽然芝加哥居民通常比其他大城市的居民经历更高的犯罪率,但他们向警方报告的犯罪率基本相似。向警方报案和不向警方报案的理由通常与其他地方的受害者相似。结论尽管有对警察不信任的记录,但芝加哥居民向警察报告严重暴力或入室盗窃的比率似乎并不比其他大城市的居民低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
6.20%
发文量
36
期刊介绍: For over 45 years, this international forum has advanced research in criminology and criminal justice. Through articles, research notes, and special issues, the Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency continues to keep you up to date on contemporary issues and controversies within the criminal justice field. Research and Analysis: The Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency presents a wide range of research and analysis in the field of criminology. You’ll find research on the social, political and economic contexts of criminal justice, examining victims, offenders, police, courts and sanctions. Comprehensive Coverage: The science of criminal justice combines a wide range of academic disciplines and fields of practice. To advance the field of criminal justice the journal provides a forum that is informed by a variety of fields. Among the perspectives that you’ll find represented in the journal are: -biology/genetics- criminology- criminal justice/administration- courts- corrections- crime prevention- crime science- economics- geography- police studies- political science- psychology- sociology.
期刊最新文献
Contextualizing Lives and Historical Time: Examining Changes in the Transition to Adulthood and Age-Arrest Trajectories from the 1960s to 2018 What Adolescents Do or Say to Actively Influence Peers: Compliance-Gaining Tactics and Adolescent Deviance An Examination of Racial and Ethnic Disparity in Prison Misconduct Punishment Collective Self-Control as a Feature of Social Contexts: Theoretical Arguments and a Multilevel Empirical Test Revisiting the Structural (In)Variances of Homicide: Examining the Differential Effects of Context Across Homicide Types
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1