Reflections on the Customary Laws of Benin Kingdom and Its Living Cultural Objects in the Discourse of Ownership and Restitution

Q2 Arts and Humanities Santander Art and Culture Law Review Pub Date : 2022-12-30 DOI:10.4467/2450050xsnr.22.011.17024
Oluwatoyin Sogbesan, Tokie Laotan-Brown
{"title":"Reflections on the Customary Laws of Benin Kingdom and Its Living Cultural Objects in the Discourse of Ownership and Restitution","authors":"Oluwatoyin Sogbesan, Tokie Laotan-Brown","doi":"10.4467/2450050xsnr.22.011.17024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The British punitive expedition of 1897 led to the theft and vandalization of the cultural heritage of the Benin kingdom. The plunder included more than 3,000 cultural objects made of bronzes, ivories, beads, and other objects, which were produced since the 1st century AD to commemorate historical moments, political transitions, and ritual purposes. This theft dishonoured the spiritual and ritual significance of these living cultural objects, and has turned them into museum artefacts. As international debates on restitution and the return of Benin Bronzes intensify, two pertinent questions which arise are: Who will be the custodians of the returned artefacts?; and How will they be conserved? In this article, we address these two questions through the lens of Benin customary laws and practices. We argue that within this local jurisprudence, the Emwin Arre– the living cultural heritage described above –belong to the Oba of Benin and should be returned to the royal Palace, where they will be preserved, protected, and shared with the present and future generations.","PeriodicalId":36554,"journal":{"name":"Santander Art and Culture Law Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Santander Art and Culture Law Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4467/2450050xsnr.22.011.17024","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The British punitive expedition of 1897 led to the theft and vandalization of the cultural heritage of the Benin kingdom. The plunder included more than 3,000 cultural objects made of bronzes, ivories, beads, and other objects, which were produced since the 1st century AD to commemorate historical moments, political transitions, and ritual purposes. This theft dishonoured the spiritual and ritual significance of these living cultural objects, and has turned them into museum artefacts. As international debates on restitution and the return of Benin Bronzes intensify, two pertinent questions which arise are: Who will be the custodians of the returned artefacts?; and How will they be conserved? In this article, we address these two questions through the lens of Benin customary laws and practices. We argue that within this local jurisprudence, the Emwin Arre– the living cultural heritage described above –belong to the Oba of Benin and should be returned to the royal Palace, where they will be preserved, protected, and shared with the present and future generations.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
所有权与归还话语中贝宁王国习惯法及其生活文化对象的思考
1897年英国惩罚性远征导致贝宁王国的文化遗产遭到盗窃和破坏。掠夺品包括3000多件由青铜器、象牙、珠子和其他物品制成的文物,这些文物是自公元1世纪以来为纪念历史时刻、政治过渡和仪式目的而生产的。这种盗窃行为玷污了这些活文物的精神和仪式意义,并将它们变成了博物馆的文物。随着关于归还和归还贝宁青铜器的国际辩论愈演愈烈,出现了两个相关问题:谁将是归还文物的保管人?;它们将如何被保存?在这篇文章中,我们从贝宁习惯法和惯例的角度来处理这两个问题。我们认为,在当地的判例中,埃姆温·阿雷(Emwin Arre)——如上所述的活的文化遗产——属于贝宁的奥巴,应该归还王宫,在那里它们将得到保存、保护,并与今世后代共享。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Santander Art and Culture Law Review
Santander Art and Culture Law Review Arts and Humanities-Visual Arts and Performing Arts
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Shaping Franco-German Cooperation in the Museum Sector Combating Illicit Trade in Cultural Objects in the Staatliche Museen zu Berlin (State Museums in Berlin): Policies in Acquisitions and Loans and Research of Provenance Trade and Export of Archaeological Cultural Goods: A Conflict of Ideas Inventorying is Reckoning Combatting the Illicit Trade in Cultural Objects: Re-visiting the 2022 EU Action Plan against Trafficking in Cultural Goods
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1