Are we Ready to Use Microchip Implants? An International Cross-sectional Study

IF 1.5 Q3 MANAGEMENT Organizacija Pub Date : 2021-12-01 DOI:10.2478/orga-2021-0019
Anja Žnidaršič, A. Baggia, A. Pavlíček, J. Fischer, M. Rostanski, Borut Werber
{"title":"Are we Ready to Use Microchip Implants? An International Cross-sectional Study","authors":"Anja Žnidaršič, A. Baggia, A. Pavlíček, J. Fischer, M. Rostanski, Borut Werber","doi":"10.2478/orga-2021-0019","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Background and purpose: Despite their clear relevance to human life, microchip implants are still widely viewed as negative, threatening our privacy and raising growing concerns about our health. This paper aims to investigate the important factors influencing people’s perception of microchip implants and their willingness to use them for different purposes. Methodology: The cross-sectional study was conducted in three European countries and the data were analysed using the group Structural Equation Modeling approach. Only complete answers to the online survey questionnaire items were used representing a convenience sample of 804 respondents. Results: The results show that perceived ease of use, usefulness and perceived trust are significant predictors of intention to use microchip implants. Perceived trust is influenced by privacy and technology safety. Concerns about painful procedures and other health concerns reduce the perceived usefulness of microchip implants. Apart from the predictor health concerns, the results were similar in all countries. Conclusion: Based on the presented results, researchers interested in investigating the actual use of microchip implants can establish a solid foundation for their research. The results may assist policy makers in developing the regulations to ensure the safe use of microchip implants and allow for a higher level of security. As a follow-up, investigation of changes in the acceptance of microchip implants following the threat of a global pandemic is proposed.","PeriodicalId":44901,"journal":{"name":"Organizacija","volume":"54 1","pages":"275 - 292"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Organizacija","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2478/orga-2021-0019","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Abstract Background and purpose: Despite their clear relevance to human life, microchip implants are still widely viewed as negative, threatening our privacy and raising growing concerns about our health. This paper aims to investigate the important factors influencing people’s perception of microchip implants and their willingness to use them for different purposes. Methodology: The cross-sectional study was conducted in three European countries and the data were analysed using the group Structural Equation Modeling approach. Only complete answers to the online survey questionnaire items were used representing a convenience sample of 804 respondents. Results: The results show that perceived ease of use, usefulness and perceived trust are significant predictors of intention to use microchip implants. Perceived trust is influenced by privacy and technology safety. Concerns about painful procedures and other health concerns reduce the perceived usefulness of microchip implants. Apart from the predictor health concerns, the results were similar in all countries. Conclusion: Based on the presented results, researchers interested in investigating the actual use of microchip implants can establish a solid foundation for their research. The results may assist policy makers in developing the regulations to ensure the safe use of microchip implants and allow for a higher level of security. As a follow-up, investigation of changes in the acceptance of microchip implants following the threat of a global pandemic is proposed.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
我们准备好使用微芯片植入物了吗?国际横断面研究
摘要背景和目的:尽管微芯片植入物与人类生活有着明显的相关性,但它们仍然被广泛认为是负面的,威胁着我们的隐私,并引发了人们对我们健康的日益担忧。本文旨在调查影响人们对微芯片植入物的感知以及将其用于不同目的的意愿的重要因素。方法:在三个欧洲国家进行了横断面研究,并使用结构方程建模方法对数据进行了分析。仅使用了在线调查问卷项目的完整答案,代表了804名受访者的便利样本。结果:研究结果表明,感知的易用性、有用性和感知的信任是使用微芯片植入物意向的重要预测因素。感知信任受到隐私和技术安全的影响。对疼痛程序和其他健康问题的担忧降低了微芯片植入物的实用性。除了预测健康问题外,所有国家的结果都相似。结论:基于上述结果,有兴趣调查微芯片植入物实际使用的研究人员可以为他们的研究奠定坚实的基础。研究结果可能有助于政策制定者制定法规,以确保微芯片植入物的安全使用,并实现更高水平的安全。作为后续行动,建议对全球疫情威胁后微芯片植入物接受度的变化进行调查。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Organizacija
Organizacija MANAGEMENT-
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
15.80%
发文量
15
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: Organizacija (Journal of Management, Information Systems and Human Resources) is an interdisciplinary peer reviewed journal that seeks both theoretical and practical papers devoted to managerial aspects of the subject matter indicated in the title. In particular the journal focuses on papers which cover state-of art developments in the subject area of the journal, its implementation and use in the organizational practice. Organizacija is covered by numerous Abstracting & Indexing services, including SCOPUS.
期刊最新文献
Narcissistic Leadership and Project Success: The Role of Knowledge Sharing and Collectivism in IT Firms Can Machiavellianism and Money Intentions Influence Entrepreneurial Intention? Motherhood Gap and Employer Discrimination. A Qualitative Investigation in the German Context Role of Hotel Management Crisis in Covid-19 and Post-Covid-19 Period: A Case Study of Opatija Riviera Micro-Region in Croatia Born Globals and Born Sustainables: Motives of Accumulating Wealth and of Making a Difference in the World
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1