Social Investment in an Age of Austerity: A Comparison of Family Policy Reforms in Four European Countries

IF 0.3 4区 社会学 Q4 SOCIAL ISSUES Revija Za Socijalnu Politiku Pub Date : 2020-12-15 DOI:10.3935/RSP.V27I3.1563
S. Blum, S. Correia, Mikael Nygård, Tatjana Rakar, K. Wall
{"title":"Social Investment in an Age of Austerity: A Comparison of Family Policy Reforms in Four European Countries","authors":"S. Blum, S. Correia, Mikael Nygård, Tatjana Rakar, K. Wall","doi":"10.3935/RSP.V27I3.1563","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The focus of this article is on family policy reforms in four European countries – Austria, Finland, Portugal, and Slovenia – between 2008 and 2015 These years were marked by the ‘Great Recession’, and by the rise of the so-cial-investment perspective Social investment is an umbrella concept, though, and it is also somewhat ambiguous This article distinguishes between different social-investment variants, which emerge from a focus on its interaction with alternative social-policy perspectives, namely social protection and austeri-ty We identify different variants along the degree of social-investment: from comprehensive, over crowding out, towards lean forms While the empirical analysis highlights variation, it also shows how there is a specific crisis context, which may lead to ‘crowding out’ of other policy approaches and ‘leaner’ forms of social investment This has led to strong cutbacks in family cash benefits, while public childcare and parental leaves have proved more resilient in the investigated countries Those findings are revelatory in the current Covid-19 pandemic, where countries are entering a next, possibly larger economic crisis © 2020, University of Zagreb, Faculty of Political Sciences All rights reserved","PeriodicalId":53979,"journal":{"name":"Revija Za Socijalnu Politiku","volume":"27 1","pages":"249-267"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revija Za Socijalnu Politiku","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3935/RSP.V27I3.1563","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SOCIAL ISSUES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The focus of this article is on family policy reforms in four European countries – Austria, Finland, Portugal, and Slovenia – between 2008 and 2015 These years were marked by the ‘Great Recession’, and by the rise of the so-cial-investment perspective Social investment is an umbrella concept, though, and it is also somewhat ambiguous This article distinguishes between different social-investment variants, which emerge from a focus on its interaction with alternative social-policy perspectives, namely social protection and austeri-ty We identify different variants along the degree of social-investment: from comprehensive, over crowding out, towards lean forms While the empirical analysis highlights variation, it also shows how there is a specific crisis context, which may lead to ‘crowding out’ of other policy approaches and ‘leaner’ forms of social investment This has led to strong cutbacks in family cash benefits, while public childcare and parental leaves have proved more resilient in the investigated countries Those findings are revelatory in the current Covid-19 pandemic, where countries are entering a next, possibly larger economic crisis © 2020, University of Zagreb, Faculty of Political Sciences All rights reserved
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
紧缩时代的社会投资:欧洲四国家庭政策改革比较
本文的重点是2008年至2015年间四个欧洲国家——奥地利、芬兰、葡萄牙和斯洛文尼亚——的家庭政策改革。这些年以“大衰退”和社会投资视角的兴起为标志,这篇文章区分了不同的社会投资变体,这些变体源于其与替代社会政策视角的互动,即社会保护和紧缩。我们根据社会投资的程度确定了不同的变体:从全面、过度挤出、,倾向于精简形式虽然实证分析强调了差异,但它也表明了具体的危机背景是如何存在的,这可能会导致其他政策方法和“精简”形式的社会投资被“挤出”。这导致了家庭现金福利的大幅削减,尽管事实证明,在被调查的国家,公共托儿服务和育儿假更具弹性。这些发现对当前的新冠肺炎疫情具有启示意义,各国正在进入下一场可能更大的经济危机©2020,萨格勒布大学政治科学学院保留所有权利
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
33 weeks
期刊最新文献
Understanding categories of postpartum care use among privately insured patients in the United States: a cluster-analytic approach. The Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Migration Within the Countries of the European Union Učinci stambenog zbrinjavanja mlađe populacije na demografske trendove u Zagrebu Dimensions of the Universities Third Mission from the University Teachers and Students Perspective Interakcija financijskog razvitka, nejednakosti i rizika od siromaštva u Republici Hrvatskoj
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1