Fourth-Line Therapy in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma (mRCC): Results from the International mRCC Database Consortium (IMDC)

IF 1.1 Q4 ONCOLOGY Kidney Cancer Pub Date : 2020-07-02 DOI:10.3233/KCA-170020
I. Stukalin, J. Wells, A. Fraccon, F. Pasini, C. Porta, Aly-Khan A. Lalani, S. Srinivas, I. Bowman, J. Brugarolas, Jae-Lyun Lee, F. Donskov, B. Beuselinck, A. Bamias, B. Rini, H. Sim, N. Agarwal, S. Rha, R. Kanesvaran, T. Choueiri, D. Heng
{"title":"Fourth-Line Therapy in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma (mRCC): Results from the International mRCC Database Consortium (IMDC)","authors":"I. Stukalin, J. Wells, A. Fraccon, F. Pasini, C. Porta, Aly-Khan A. Lalani, S. Srinivas, I. Bowman, J. Brugarolas, Jae-Lyun Lee, F. Donskov, B. Beuselinck, A. Bamias, B. Rini, H. Sim, N. Agarwal, S. Rha, R. Kanesvaran, T. Choueiri, D. Heng","doi":"10.3233/KCA-170020","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Fourth-line therapy (4LT) in the treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) varies significantly due to the lack of data and recommendations to guide treatment decisions. Objective: To evaluate the use and efficacy of 4LT in mRCC patients. Methods: The International mRCC Database Consortium (IMDC) dataset was used to identify patients with mRCC treated with 4LT. This is a multicenter, retrospective cohort study. Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were calculated using Kaplan-Meier curves. Patients were evaluated for overall response. The six prognostic variables included in 1Contributed equally as senior authors ∗Correspondence to: Dr. Daniel Y.C. Heng, Tom Baker Cancer Centre, 1331 29 Street NW, Calgary AB T2N 4N2, Canada. Tel.: +1 403 521 3166; Fax: +1 403 283 1651; E-mail: daniel.heng@albertahealthservices.ca. ISSN 2468-4562/18/$35.00 © 2018 – IOS Press and the authors. All rights reserved This article is published online with Open Access and distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (CC BY-NC 4.0). 32 I. Stukalin et al. / Fourth-Line Therapy in mRCC the IMDC prognostic model were used to stratify patients into favorable-, intermediateand poor-risk groups. Exploratory analyses were performed examining the elderly (>70 years old) and non-clear cell RCC subgroups. Proportional hazards regression modelling was performed adjusting these covariates by IMDC criteria measured at initiation of 4th line therapy. Results: 7498 patients were treated with first line targeted therapy and out of these 594 (7.9%) received 4LT. Everolimus was the most frequently used 4LT (16.8%). Sorafenib, axitinib, pazopanib, sunitinib and clinical trial drugs were also used in >10% of patients. The OS of patients on any 4LT was 12.8 months, with a PFS of 4.4 months. The overall response rate (ORR) was 13.7%. Favorable-risk patients using IMDC criteria (5%) displayed an OS of 23.1 months, intermediate-risk patients (66%) had an OS of 13.8 months and poor-risk patients (29%) had an OS of 7.8 (p < 0.0001) months. Age >70 years and non-clear cell histology did not impact OS. Our study is limited by its retrospective design. Conclusions: 4LT use appears to have activity in mRCC patients. The IMDC continues to be of prognostic value in the fourth-line setting for OS. This study helps to set a benchmark for response rate and survival for which clinical trials can plan sample size calculations and aim to improve upon.","PeriodicalId":17823,"journal":{"name":"Kidney Cancer","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2020-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.3233/KCA-170020","citationCount":"12","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Kidney Cancer","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3233/KCA-170020","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 12

Abstract

Background: Fourth-line therapy (4LT) in the treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) varies significantly due to the lack of data and recommendations to guide treatment decisions. Objective: To evaluate the use and efficacy of 4LT in mRCC patients. Methods: The International mRCC Database Consortium (IMDC) dataset was used to identify patients with mRCC treated with 4LT. This is a multicenter, retrospective cohort study. Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were calculated using Kaplan-Meier curves. Patients were evaluated for overall response. The six prognostic variables included in 1Contributed equally as senior authors ∗Correspondence to: Dr. Daniel Y.C. Heng, Tom Baker Cancer Centre, 1331 29 Street NW, Calgary AB T2N 4N2, Canada. Tel.: +1 403 521 3166; Fax: +1 403 283 1651; E-mail: daniel.heng@albertahealthservices.ca. ISSN 2468-4562/18/$35.00 © 2018 – IOS Press and the authors. All rights reserved This article is published online with Open Access and distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (CC BY-NC 4.0). 32 I. Stukalin et al. / Fourth-Line Therapy in mRCC the IMDC prognostic model were used to stratify patients into favorable-, intermediateand poor-risk groups. Exploratory analyses were performed examining the elderly (>70 years old) and non-clear cell RCC subgroups. Proportional hazards regression modelling was performed adjusting these covariates by IMDC criteria measured at initiation of 4th line therapy. Results: 7498 patients were treated with first line targeted therapy and out of these 594 (7.9%) received 4LT. Everolimus was the most frequently used 4LT (16.8%). Sorafenib, axitinib, pazopanib, sunitinib and clinical trial drugs were also used in >10% of patients. The OS of patients on any 4LT was 12.8 months, with a PFS of 4.4 months. The overall response rate (ORR) was 13.7%. Favorable-risk patients using IMDC criteria (5%) displayed an OS of 23.1 months, intermediate-risk patients (66%) had an OS of 13.8 months and poor-risk patients (29%) had an OS of 7.8 (p < 0.0001) months. Age >70 years and non-clear cell histology did not impact OS. Our study is limited by its retrospective design. Conclusions: 4LT use appears to have activity in mRCC patients. The IMDC continues to be of prognostic value in the fourth-line setting for OS. This study helps to set a benchmark for response rate and survival for which clinical trials can plan sample size calculations and aim to improve upon.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
转移性肾细胞癌(mRCC)的四线治疗:来自国际mRCC数据库联盟(IMDC)的结果
背景:由于缺乏指导治疗决策的数据和建议,四线疗法(4LT)在治疗转移性肾细胞癌(mRCC)方面存在显著差异。目的:评价4LT在mRCC患者中的应用及疗效。方法:使用国际mRCC数据库联盟(IMDC)数据集来识别接受4LT治疗的mRCC患者。这是一项多中心回顾性队列研究。使用Kaplan-Meier曲线计算总生存期(OS)和无进展生存期(PFS)。评估患者的总体反应。1中包括的六个预后变量以高级作者的身份同等输入∗通信:Daniel Y.C.Heng博士,Tom Baker癌症中心,1331 29 Street NW,Calgary AB T2N 4N2,Canada。电话:+1 403 521 3166;传真:+1 403 283 1651;电子邮件:daniel.heng@albertahealthservices.ca.ISSN 2468-4562/18/35.00美元©2018–IOS出版社和作者。保留所有权利本文以开放获取的方式在线发表,并根据知识共享归因非商业许可证(CC BY-NC 4.0)的条款进行分发。32 I.Stukalin等人/mRCC中的第四线治疗IMDC预后模型用于将患者分为有利、中等和较差风险组。对老年人(>70岁)和非透明细胞RCC亚组进行了探索性分析。通过IMDC标准进行比例风险回归建模,在第四线治疗开始时测量这些协变量。结果:7498例患者接受了一线靶向治疗,其中594例(7.9%)接受了4LT治疗。依维莫司是最常用的4LT(16.8%)。索拉非尼、阿西替尼、帕唑帕尼、舒尼替尼和临床试验药物也用于>10%的患者。任何4LT患者的OS为12.8个月,PFS为4.4个月。总有效率(ORR)为13.7%。符合IMDC标准的高危患者(5%)的OS为23.1个月,中危患者(66%)的OS是13.8个月;低危患者(29%)的OS则是7.8个月(p<0.0001)。年龄>70岁和非透明细胞组织学不影响OS。我们的研究受到其回顾性设计的限制。结论:4LT的使用在mRCC患者中似乎具有活性。IMDC在OS的第四行设置中仍然具有预测价值。这项研究有助于为反应率和生存率设定一个基准,临床试验可以计划样本量的计算,并旨在改进。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Kidney Cancer
Kidney Cancer Multiple-
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
8.30%
发文量
23
期刊最新文献
Emerging Antibody-Drug Conjugate Therapies and Targets for Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Genomic and Transcriptomic Characteristics of Tumors of Patients with Metastatic Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma Clinically Benefiting from First-Line Treatment with Ipilimumab Plus Nivolumab Nephrotoxicity Associated with Contemporary Renal Cell Carcinoma Regimens: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Targeted Literature Review of Outcomes to Initial Systemic Therapy for Advanced/Metastatic Non-Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma in Observational Studies Fibrinogen Levels in Patients with Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Treated with Nivolumab: Results of a Multicenter Prospective Trial
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1