Efficiency of toxics baits for the control of Blattella Germanica (LINNAEUS, 1767) (BLATTODEA)

Q4 Environmental Science Revista em Agronegocio e Meio Ambiente Pub Date : 2022-02-21 DOI:10.17765/2176-9168.2022v15n1e9157
Sara L. S. Gomes, M. V. A. Lopes, M. C. Peres, T. S. Melo, K. Benati, A. R. S. Andrade
{"title":"Efficiency of toxics baits for the control of Blattella Germanica (LINNAEUS, 1767) (BLATTODEA)","authors":"Sara L. S. Gomes, M. V. A. Lopes, M. C. Peres, T. S. Melo, K. Benati, A. R. S. Andrade","doi":"10.17765/2176-9168.2022v15n1e9157","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Blattella germanica is considered to be a pest insect that is difficult to control and which tends to be controlled by the use of chemical products. As such, the indiscriminate use of insecticides can result in cockroach resistance and environmental contamination. Aiming to promote a more conscientious and effective control method, formulations of toxic gel baits were developed. These baits result in less environmental contamination and can be applied in areas where the use of conventional insecticides is not possible. This study aimed to evaluate which toxic bait presented the most efficient control of B. germanica, taking into consideration characteristics such as attractiveness, feeding stimulation and mortality rate. For the bioassay, four compositions of toxic gel baits were used in a test arena, where, in the presence of the baits, (1) the time until consumption, (2) the bait consumed, (3) the time taken for feeding stimulation and (4) the time until death were evaluated. Toxic baits were compared using paired T-tests. We verified that the Fipronil toxic bait did not present attractiveness nor consumption and the Indoxacarb toxic bait presented the greatest attractiveness. There was no statistical difference between the baits when evaluating feeding stimulation and mortality, indicating, in this case, that both baits acted in a similar manner. The Imidacloprid and Indoxacarb toxic baits were recommended for the control of B. germanica, as they caused mortalities during a period of less than 24h. However, Indoxacarb presented a greater rate of attractiveness when compared to the Imidacloprid gel baits.","PeriodicalId":38839,"journal":{"name":"Revista em Agronegocio e Meio Ambiente","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista em Agronegocio e Meio Ambiente","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17765/2176-9168.2022v15n1e9157","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Environmental Science","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Blattella germanica is considered to be a pest insect that is difficult to control and which tends to be controlled by the use of chemical products. As such, the indiscriminate use of insecticides can result in cockroach resistance and environmental contamination. Aiming to promote a more conscientious and effective control method, formulations of toxic gel baits were developed. These baits result in less environmental contamination and can be applied in areas where the use of conventional insecticides is not possible. This study aimed to evaluate which toxic bait presented the most efficient control of B. germanica, taking into consideration characteristics such as attractiveness, feeding stimulation and mortality rate. For the bioassay, four compositions of toxic gel baits were used in a test arena, where, in the presence of the baits, (1) the time until consumption, (2) the bait consumed, (3) the time taken for feeding stimulation and (4) the time until death were evaluated. Toxic baits were compared using paired T-tests. We verified that the Fipronil toxic bait did not present attractiveness nor consumption and the Indoxacarb toxic bait presented the greatest attractiveness. There was no statistical difference between the baits when evaluating feeding stimulation and mortality, indicating, in this case, that both baits acted in a similar manner. The Imidacloprid and Indoxacarb toxic baits were recommended for the control of B. germanica, as they caused mortalities during a period of less than 24h. However, Indoxacarb presented a greater rate of attractiveness when compared to the Imidacloprid gel baits.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
毒饵防治德国小蠊的效果(LINNAEUS,1767)(BLATTODEA)
德国小蠊被认为是一种难以控制的害虫,往往通过使用化学产品来控制。因此,滥用杀虫剂会导致蟑螂耐药性和环境污染。为了推广一种更认真有效的控制方法,开发了有毒凝胶诱饵的配方。这些诱饵减少了环境污染,可以应用于无法使用传统杀虫剂的地区。本研究旨在评估哪种有毒诱饵对德国小蠊的控制最有效,同时考虑了吸引力、饲养刺激和死亡率等特征。对于生物测定,在试验场中使用四种有毒凝胶诱饵的组合物,其中,在诱饵存在的情况下,评估(1)直到消耗的时间,(2)消耗的诱饵,(3)喂食刺激所花费的时间和(4)直到死亡的时间。使用配对T检验对毒性诱饵进行比较。我们验证了氟虫腈有毒诱饵既没有吸引力,也没有消耗量,而Indoxacarb有毒诱饵的吸引力最大。在评估喂养刺激和死亡率时,诱饵之间没有统计学差异,这表明在这种情况下,两种诱饵的作用方式相似。建议使用吡虫啉和Indoxacarb有毒诱饵来控制德国小蠊,因为它们在不到24小时的时间内会导致死亡。然而,与吡虫啉凝胶诱饵相比,Indoxacarb的吸引力更大。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Revista em Agronegocio e Meio Ambiente
Revista em Agronegocio e Meio Ambiente Environmental Science-Environmental Science (all)
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
84
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊最新文献
Turbidity removal and pH of raw water treated with natural coagulants Modelagem e otimização da cinética do processo de pirólise de biomassas florestais Impacto do desmatamento e queimas na biodiversidade invisível da Amazônia É possível utilizar o biossólido na produção de mudas de progênies de candeia? Efeitos de reguladores vegetais nas características agronômicas de soja cultivada em baixa latitude
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1