Spatial and Temporal Evolutionary Characteristics of Landscape Pattern of a Typical Karst Watershed Based on GEE Platform

Q3 Environmental Science Journal of Resources and Ecology Pub Date : 2023-08-22 DOI:10.5814/j.issn.1674-764x.2023.005.004
Qingqing Wei, H. Wen, Wang Jinye, Xinran Zhou, Yuefeng Yao
{"title":"Spatial and Temporal Evolutionary Characteristics of Landscape Pattern of a Typical Karst Watershed Based on GEE Platform","authors":"Qingqing Wei, H. Wen, Wang Jinye, Xinran Zhou, Yuefeng Yao","doi":"10.5814/j.issn.1674-764x.2023.005.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract: Given the high degree of fragmentation and poor resistance to disturbance in karst landscapes, it is important to clarify the spatial and temporal dynamics of landscape patterns in karst areas when designing karst ecological protection strategies. Using the Li River Basin as the study area, the spatial distribution and dynamic evolution of landscape patterns in the basin were analyzed at the levels of landscape utilization, landscape type dynamics and landscape pattern indices based on the Landsat series images for 2000 to 2020 obtained from the GEE platform as the data source. The results show three important aspects of this typical karst watershed. (1) There are large differences in landscape structure and landscape type trends between the karst and non-karst areas in the Li River Basin. (2) The comprehensive landscape type dynamic attitude of the Li River Basin is 0.22%, and the composite index of landscape type use varies from 239.49 to 244.88. The degree of landscape use is higher in karst areas than in non-karst areas, and the rate of landscape change in karst areas is more intense. The integrated index of landscape use in karst areas ranges from 262.32 to 270.50, and in non-karst areas it spans 225.28 to 227.01. The integrated landscape type motility in the karst areas is 0.31%, which is about twice as high as that in non-karst areas. (3) The overall landscape evolution of the Li River Basin shows trends of increasing fragmentation, decreasing connectivity, decreasing dominance and increasing heterogeneity, and these trends are particularly prominent in the karst areas. The results of this study can provide a scientific basis for realizing the construction goals of the National Sustainable Development Innovation Demonstration Zone in Guilin, and a technical reference for the ecological environmental management of the karst watershed.","PeriodicalId":53414,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Resources and Ecology","volume":"14 1","pages":"928 - 939"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Resources and Ecology","FirstCategoryId":"1091","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5814/j.issn.1674-764x.2023.005.004","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Environmental Science","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract: Given the high degree of fragmentation and poor resistance to disturbance in karst landscapes, it is important to clarify the spatial and temporal dynamics of landscape patterns in karst areas when designing karst ecological protection strategies. Using the Li River Basin as the study area, the spatial distribution and dynamic evolution of landscape patterns in the basin were analyzed at the levels of landscape utilization, landscape type dynamics and landscape pattern indices based on the Landsat series images for 2000 to 2020 obtained from the GEE platform as the data source. The results show three important aspects of this typical karst watershed. (1) There are large differences in landscape structure and landscape type trends between the karst and non-karst areas in the Li River Basin. (2) The comprehensive landscape type dynamic attitude of the Li River Basin is 0.22%, and the composite index of landscape type use varies from 239.49 to 244.88. The degree of landscape use is higher in karst areas than in non-karst areas, and the rate of landscape change in karst areas is more intense. The integrated index of landscape use in karst areas ranges from 262.32 to 270.50, and in non-karst areas it spans 225.28 to 227.01. The integrated landscape type motility in the karst areas is 0.31%, which is about twice as high as that in non-karst areas. (3) The overall landscape evolution of the Li River Basin shows trends of increasing fragmentation, decreasing connectivity, decreasing dominance and increasing heterogeneity, and these trends are particularly prominent in the karst areas. The results of this study can provide a scientific basis for realizing the construction goals of the National Sustainable Development Innovation Demonstration Zone in Guilin, and a technical reference for the ecological environmental management of the karst watershed.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于GEE平台的典型岩溶流域景观格局时空演化特征
摘要:鉴于岩溶景观破碎化程度高,抗干扰能力差,在设计岩溶生态保护策略时,明确岩溶地区景观格局的时空动态具有重要意义。以辽河流域为研究区域,以GEE平台2000~2020年Landsat系列影像为数据源,从景观利用、景观类型动态和景观格局指数三个层面分析了流域景观格局的空间分布和动态演变。结果显示了该典型岩溶流域的三个重要方面。(1) 漓江流域岩溶区与非岩溶区在景观结构和景观类型走向上存在较大差异。(2) 漓江流域综合景观类型动态姿态为0.22%,景观类型利用综合指数在239.49~244.88之间。岩溶地区景观利用程度高于非岩溶地区,岩溶地区景观变化率更高。岩溶地区景观利用综合指数在262.32-270.50之间,非岩溶地区景观使用综合指数在225.28-227.01之间。岩溶地区的综合景观类型运动率为0.31%,约为非岩溶地区的两倍。(3) 李河流域整体景观演化呈现出破碎化程度增加、连通性降低、优势度降低、异质性增加的趋势,这些趋势在岩溶地区尤为突出。研究结果可为实现桂林国家可持续发展创新示范区建设目标提供科学依据,为岩溶流域生态环境管理提供技术参考。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Resources and Ecology
Journal of Resources and Ecology Environmental Science-Ecology
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
107
期刊最新文献
Exploring Spatial Distribution and Influencing Factors of B&Bs in Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei in the Regional Integration Context Based on Big Data Vulnerability and Influencing Factors for Rural Settlements Land Use in Karst Mountains of China: Case Study on Qixingguan District Evolution Pattern of Rural Tourism Investment Location Choice from the Perspective of Human-Land Relationship System: Based on a Case Study of Zhejiang Province, China Effect of Traditional Village Landscape Genes on Tourists' Image Construction: Case Study of Zhangguying Village Exploring the Norm-Activation Model-Based Mechanisms Influencing the Willingness of Environmentally Friendly Behavior of Backpackers
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1