Usable for whom? Reflections on public, political art

IF 0.1 3区 艺术学 0 DANCE DANCE CHRONICLE Pub Date : 2023-05-04 DOI:10.1080/01472526.2023.2189406
Holly Bass
{"title":"Usable for whom? Reflections on public, political art","authors":"Holly Bass","doi":"10.1080/01472526.2023.2189406","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Drawn from Larne Gogarty’s doctoral dissertation, Usable Pasts: Social Practice and State Formation in American Art offers a concise comparative history of New Deal political theater, dance, and photography juxtaposed with more recent works from the 1990s to 2000s. What results is a wellresearched, albeit limited, exploration of how large-scale, social justice-oriented art has evolved in the United States. Gogarty’s title references a concept that gained traction during the Depression, as politicians and community organizers sought to draw on the past as a galvanizing force to create a cohesive sense of community in a time of widespread hardship. That is to say, the past must be artfully reframed in order to make it “usable” toward other aims, whether that be galvanizing workers to join a labor union post-WWI or gathering community members in an economically divested Southern neighborhood in the early 2000s. While the book doesn’t necessarily make a convincing argument about art’s role in state formation, it does provide an engaging history of public, political art. Early in the book’s introduction, Gogarty defines the range of terminology used to describe artists who work with social relations as a source or medium, often artists who create work with “non-artists” (p. 9) from a particular social group or identity. Gogarty notes, “Some of the labels devised for this work include participatory art, collaborative art, socially engaged art, dialogical art, new genre public art, relational aesthetics, littoral art, collective artistic praxis and social practice” (p. 8). Choosing the term “social practice,” Gogarty explains this selection based on its wide acceptance with few attachments to particular scholars, artists, or curators. As a multidisciplinary, community-engaged artist, I have long held a healthy skepticism of these terms, especially the ways they come in and out of fashion, and their own usable past as a conduit for art market speculators to commodify what would generally be considered community activism with some level of aesthetic appeal. For instance, if the Black Panther","PeriodicalId":42141,"journal":{"name":"DANCE CHRONICLE","volume":"46 1","pages":"140 - 145"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"DANCE CHRONICLE","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/01472526.2023.2189406","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"艺术学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"DANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Drawn from Larne Gogarty’s doctoral dissertation, Usable Pasts: Social Practice and State Formation in American Art offers a concise comparative history of New Deal political theater, dance, and photography juxtaposed with more recent works from the 1990s to 2000s. What results is a wellresearched, albeit limited, exploration of how large-scale, social justice-oriented art has evolved in the United States. Gogarty’s title references a concept that gained traction during the Depression, as politicians and community organizers sought to draw on the past as a galvanizing force to create a cohesive sense of community in a time of widespread hardship. That is to say, the past must be artfully reframed in order to make it “usable” toward other aims, whether that be galvanizing workers to join a labor union post-WWI or gathering community members in an economically divested Southern neighborhood in the early 2000s. While the book doesn’t necessarily make a convincing argument about art’s role in state formation, it does provide an engaging history of public, political art. Early in the book’s introduction, Gogarty defines the range of terminology used to describe artists who work with social relations as a source or medium, often artists who create work with “non-artists” (p. 9) from a particular social group or identity. Gogarty notes, “Some of the labels devised for this work include participatory art, collaborative art, socially engaged art, dialogical art, new genre public art, relational aesthetics, littoral art, collective artistic praxis and social practice” (p. 8). Choosing the term “social practice,” Gogarty explains this selection based on its wide acceptance with few attachments to particular scholars, artists, or curators. As a multidisciplinary, community-engaged artist, I have long held a healthy skepticism of these terms, especially the ways they come in and out of fashion, and their own usable past as a conduit for art market speculators to commodify what would generally be considered community activism with some level of aesthetic appeal. For instance, if the Black Panther
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
对谁有用?对公共、政治艺术的反思
《可用的过去:美国艺术中的社会实践和国家形成》一书摘自Larne Gogarty的博士论文,对新政时期的政治戏剧、舞蹈和摄影以及20世纪90年代至21世纪初的新作进行了简明的比较。结果是对大规模的、以社会正义为导向的艺术在美国的演变进行了深入研究,尽管研究有限。Gogarty的标题引用了一个在大萧条时期获得关注的概念,当时政治家和社区组织者试图利用过去作为一种激励力量,在一个普遍困难的时代创造一种凝聚力的社区意识。也就是说,过去必须被巧妙地重新构造,以使其“可用”于其他目标,无论是激励工人在第一次世界大战后加入工会,还是在21世纪初在经济萧条的南方社区聚集社区成员。虽然这本书不一定对艺术在国家形成中的作用做出令人信服的论证,但它确实提供了一段引人入胜的公共政治艺术历史。在书的前言中,Gogarty定义了用于描述以社会关系为来源或媒介的艺术家的术语范围,通常是那些与来自特定社会群体或身份的“非艺术家”(第9页)一起创作作品的艺术家。Gogarty注意到,“为这项工作设计的一些标签包括参与艺术,合作艺术,社会参与艺术,对话艺术,新类型公共艺术,关系美学,滨海艺术,集体艺术实践和社会实践”(第8页)。选择“社会实践”一词,Gogarty解释说,这一选择是基于它的广泛接受,很少与特定的学者,艺术家或策展人有关。作为一个多学科、社区参与的艺术家,我一直对这些术语持健康的怀疑态度,尤其是它们流行和过时的方式,以及它们自己可用的过去,作为艺术市场投机者将通常被视为具有某种审美吸引力的社区行动主义商品化的渠道。例如,如果黑豹
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
22
期刊介绍: For dance scholars, professors, practitioners, and aficionados, Dance Chronicle is indispensable for keeping up with the rapidly changing field of dance studies. Dance Chronicle publishes research on a wide variety of Western and non-Western forms, including classical, avant-garde, and popular genres, often in connection with the related arts: music, literature, visual arts, theatre, and film. Our purview encompasses research rooted in humanities-based paradigms: historical, theoretical, aesthetic, ethnographic, and multi-modal inquiries into dance as art and/or cultural practice. Offering the best from both established and emerging dance scholars, Dance Chronicle is an ideal resource for those who love dance, past and present. Recently, Dance Chronicle has featured special issues on visual arts and dance, literature and dance, music and dance, dance criticism, preserving dance as a living legacy, dancing identity in diaspora, choreographers at the cutting edge, Martha Graham, women choreographers in ballet, and ballet in a global world.
期刊最新文献
Introduction to Issue 47.3 Strolling from Jazz to Funk Unruly Choreographies and the Contradictions of Safety Authenticities of K-pop Cover Dance Influencers in/from Bali, Indonesia Cross-cultural Identities: An interdisciplinary analysis of the jota in The Three-Cornered Hat (1919)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1