Social-Emotional and Behavioral Functioning Profiles and Demographic Factors: A Latent Profile Analysis in Elementary Students

IF 1.5 4区 心理学 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment Pub Date : 2023-04-11 DOI:10.1177/07342829231167726
Ning Jiang, Ruiqin Gao, C. Distefano, Jin Liu, M. Weist, J. Splett, Colleen A. Halliday-Boykins
{"title":"Social-Emotional and Behavioral Functioning Profiles and Demographic Factors: A Latent Profile Analysis in Elementary Students","authors":"Ning Jiang, Ruiqin Gao, C. Distefano, Jin Liu, M. Weist, J. Splett, Colleen A. Halliday-Boykins","doi":"10.1177/07342829231167726","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A growing interest has been given to examining the heterogeneity of children’s health to provide for their particular needs. This study examined subgroups of elementary school children’s social, emotional, and behavioral functioning (SEB) using teacher ratings of children with the Behavioral and Emotional Screening System. A Latent Profile Analysis (LPA) was conducted with 5,150 students aged from kindergarten to fifth grade. Subscale scores in the areas of externalizing risk, internalizing risk, and adaptive skills risk were used to identify profiles. Students’ grade level, sex, race, and status of receiving special education services were added to investigate the impact of covariates on the classification of latent profiles. Four profiles of risk were identified: Well Development (60.5%), Normal Development (25.8%), Externalizing and Adaptive Skills Risk (9.1%), and Elevated Risk (4.6%). Significant differences of covariates including sex, race, and status of receiving special education services were identified. Specifically, males and African American students were more likely to be classified into the “Elevated Risk” profile than other profiles. Students who did not receive special education services were more in the “Well Development” profile. The results may have important implications for the stakeholders to allocate intervention and treatment resources effectively and accurately.","PeriodicalId":51446,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/07342829231167726","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

A growing interest has been given to examining the heterogeneity of children’s health to provide for their particular needs. This study examined subgroups of elementary school children’s social, emotional, and behavioral functioning (SEB) using teacher ratings of children with the Behavioral and Emotional Screening System. A Latent Profile Analysis (LPA) was conducted with 5,150 students aged from kindergarten to fifth grade. Subscale scores in the areas of externalizing risk, internalizing risk, and adaptive skills risk were used to identify profiles. Students’ grade level, sex, race, and status of receiving special education services were added to investigate the impact of covariates on the classification of latent profiles. Four profiles of risk were identified: Well Development (60.5%), Normal Development (25.8%), Externalizing and Adaptive Skills Risk (9.1%), and Elevated Risk (4.6%). Significant differences of covariates including sex, race, and status of receiving special education services were identified. Specifically, males and African American students were more likely to be classified into the “Elevated Risk” profile than other profiles. Students who did not receive special education services were more in the “Well Development” profile. The results may have important implications for the stakeholders to allocate intervention and treatment resources effectively and accurately.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
社会情绪和行为功能特征与人口学因素:小学生的潜在特征分析
人们越来越关注儿童健康的异质性,以满足他们的特殊需求。这项研究使用行为和情绪筛查系统对儿童的教师评分,调查了小学儿童的社会、情绪和行为功能(SEB)亚组。对5150名幼儿园至五年级的学生进行了潜在特征分析。外化风险、内化风险和适应技能风险领域的子量表得分用于确定概况。增加学生的年级水平、性别、种族和接受特殊教育服务的状况,以调查协变量对潜在档案分类的影响。确定了四种风险状况:良好发展(60.5%)、正常发展(25.8%)、外部化和适应性技能风险(9.1%)和高风险(4.6%)。确定了性别、种族和接受特殊教育服务状况等协变量的显著差异。具体而言,与其他情况相比,男性和非裔美国学生更有可能被归类为“高风险”情况。没有接受特殊教育服务的学生更多地处于“良好发展”状态。研究结果可能对利益相关者有效、准确地分配干预和治疗资源具有重要意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment
Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL-
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
5.90%
发文量
61
期刊介绍: The Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment (JPA) publishes contemporary and important information focusing on psychological and educational assessment research and evidence-based practices as well as assessment instrumentation. JPA is well known internationally for the quality of published assessment-related research, theory and practice papers, and book and test reviews. The methodologically sound and impiricially-based studies and critical test and book reviews will be of particular interest to all assessment specialists including practicing psychologists, psychoeducational consultants, educational diagnosticians and special educators.
期刊最新文献
Resolving Dimensionality Issues of the Utretch Work Engagement Scale for Students Using an Integrative Data-Analytic Framework Psychometric Properties of the School Support Scale (SSS) for a Sample of Chilean Adolescents Interpretation Evidence for the Multidimensional Test Anxiety Scale: A Brief Report Perceived School Belonging Among Youth with Chronic Physical Illness Florence Bullying-Victimization Scales: Validation Study and Victimization Associations With Well-Being and Social Self-Efficacy
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1