Comparative sedimentation equilibrium analysis of two IgG1 glycoforms: IgGCri and IgGWid

IF 2.2 4区 生物学 Q3 BIOPHYSICS European Biophysics Journal Pub Date : 2023-05-17 DOI:10.1007/s00249-023-01656-x
Khalil Abu Hammad, Vlad Dinu, Thomas E. MacCalman, Jacob Pattem, Margaret Goodall, Richard B. Gillis, Roy Jefferis, Stephen E. Harding
{"title":"Comparative sedimentation equilibrium analysis of two IgG1 glycoforms: IgGCri and IgGWid","authors":"Khalil Abu Hammad,&nbsp;Vlad Dinu,&nbsp;Thomas E. MacCalman,&nbsp;Jacob Pattem,&nbsp;Margaret Goodall,&nbsp;Richard B. Gillis,&nbsp;Roy Jefferis,&nbsp;Stephen E. Harding","doi":"10.1007/s00249-023-01656-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The solution properties of two different glycoforms of IgG1 (IgG1Cri and IgG1Wid) are compared using primarily sedimentation equilibrium analysis with two complementary analysis routines: SEDFIT-MSTAR and MULTISIG. IgGCri bears diantennary complex-type glycans on its Fc domain that are fully core fucosylated and partially sialylated, whilst on IgGWid, they are non-fucosylated, partially galactosylated and non-sialylated. IgGWid is also Fab glycosylated. Despite these differences, SEDFIT-MSTAR analysis shows similar weight average molar masses <i>M</i><sub>w</sub> of ~ (150 ± 5) kDa for IgGCri and ~ (154 ± 5) kDa for IgGWid and both glycoforms show evidence of the presence of a small fraction of dimer confirmed by MULTISIG analysis and also by sedimentation coefficient distributions from supportive sedimentation velocity measurements. The closeness of the sedimentation equilibrium behaviour and sedimentation coefficient distributions with a main peak sedimentation coefficient of ~ 6.4S for both glycoforms at different concentrations suggest that the different glycosylation profiles do not significantly impact on molar mass (molecular weight) nor conformation in solution.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":548,"journal":{"name":"European Biophysics Journal","volume":"52 4-5","pages":"439 - 443"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00249-023-01656-x.pdf","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Biophysics Journal","FirstCategoryId":"2","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00249-023-01656-x","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BIOPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The solution properties of two different glycoforms of IgG1 (IgG1Cri and IgG1Wid) are compared using primarily sedimentation equilibrium analysis with two complementary analysis routines: SEDFIT-MSTAR and MULTISIG. IgGCri bears diantennary complex-type glycans on its Fc domain that are fully core fucosylated and partially sialylated, whilst on IgGWid, they are non-fucosylated, partially galactosylated and non-sialylated. IgGWid is also Fab glycosylated. Despite these differences, SEDFIT-MSTAR analysis shows similar weight average molar masses Mw of ~ (150 ± 5) kDa for IgGCri and ~ (154 ± 5) kDa for IgGWid and both glycoforms show evidence of the presence of a small fraction of dimer confirmed by MULTISIG analysis and also by sedimentation coefficient distributions from supportive sedimentation velocity measurements. The closeness of the sedimentation equilibrium behaviour and sedimentation coefficient distributions with a main peak sedimentation coefficient of ~ 6.4S for both glycoforms at different concentrations suggest that the different glycosylation profiles do not significantly impact on molar mass (molecular weight) nor conformation in solution.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
IgG1两种糖型:IgGCri和IgGWid的沉降平衡比较分析
使用主要的沉降平衡分析和两个互补的分析程序:SEDFIT-MSTAR和MULTISIG,比较了IgG1的两种不同糖型(IgG1Cri和IgG1Wid)的溶液性质。IgGCri在其Fc结构域上具有完全核心聚焦和部分唾液化的双链复合物型聚糖,而在IgGWid上,它们是非聚焦,部分半乳糖化和非唾液化。IgGWid也被Fab糖基化。尽管存在这些差异,SEDFIT-MSTAR分析显示,IgGCri和IgGWid的重量平均摩尔质量相似,分别为~(150±5)kDa和~(154±5)kDa。MULTISIG分析和支持沉降速度测量的沉降系数分布证实,这两种糖型都存在一小部分二聚体。两种糖型在不同浓度下的沉降平衡行为和沉降系数分布非常接近,沉降系数主峰为~ 6.4S,这表明不同的糖基化分布对溶液中的摩尔质量(分子量)和构象没有显著影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
European Biophysics Journal
European Biophysics Journal 生物-生物物理
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
43
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The journal publishes papers in the field of biophysics, which is defined as the study of biological phenomena by using physical methods and concepts. Original papers, reviews and Biophysics letters are published. The primary goal of this journal is to advance the understanding of biological structure and function by application of the principles of physical science, and by presenting the work in a biophysical context. Papers employing a distinctively biophysical approach at all levels of biological organisation will be considered, as will both experimental and theoretical studies. The criteria for acceptance are scientific content, originality and relevance to biological systems of current interest and importance. Principal areas of interest include: - Structure and dynamics of biological macromolecules - Membrane biophysics and ion channels - Cell biophysics and organisation - Macromolecular assemblies - Biophysical methods and instrumentation - Advanced microscopics - System dynamics.
期刊最新文献
Exploring characteristic features for effective HCN1 channel inhibition using integrated analytical approaches: 3D QSAR, molecular docking, homology modelling, ADME and molecular dynamics Quantitative characterization of non-specific interaction of two globular proteins with Dextran T70 in a binary mixture The origin of mutational epistasis Time-dependent simulation of blood flow through an abdominal aorta with iliac arteries Extreme enthalpy‒entropy compensation in the dimerization of small solutes in aqueous solution
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1