The Prevalence, Directionality, and Dyadic Perpetration Types of Intimate Partner Violence in a Community Sample in Portugal: a Gender-Inclusive Inquiry.

IF 1.6 3区 社会学 Q2 CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY European Journal on Criminal Policy and Research Pub Date : 2022-06-06 DOI:10.1007/s10610-022-09514-w
Marta Capinha, Daniel Rijo, Marco Pereira, Marlene Matos
{"title":"The Prevalence, Directionality, and Dyadic Perpetration Types of Intimate Partner Violence in a Community Sample in Portugal: a Gender-Inclusive Inquiry.","authors":"Marta Capinha, Daniel Rijo, Marco Pereira, Marlene Matos","doi":"10.1007/s10610-022-09514-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Intimate partner violence (IPV) is a major concern across the world, and its prevalence assessment has been a priority in numerous countries. However, data about IPV prevalence in Portugal is scarce and not up-to-date. This study aims to estimate IPV prevalence in Portugal. A community sample of 1392 adults (77.4% female, mean age = 34.95 years, <i>SD</i> = 12.80) was collected through a web-based survey, between March and June of 2020. Participants completed a sociodemographic questionnaire and the <i>Conflict Tactic Scales-2</i> (CTS-2). Accounting for all forms of IPV, a past-year prevalence of 64.4% and 64.6% were found, for victimization and perpetration, respectively. Regarding gender or sexual orientation, no significant differences were found in the past-year or the lifetime prevalence, neither concerning frequency. Directionality and dyadic concordance types were analyzed and showed that most violence was bidirectional. Having perpetrated violence in previous intimate relationships was the most influential factor when predicting past-year perpetration or victimization. Other significant predictors were age, being victimized before 15 years old, cohabitation with the intimate partner, and drug use, but the last two were only significant for victimization. Findings support the idea that IPV is a relevant phenomenon, regardless of gender and sexual orientation. It is the first nationwide, gender-inclusive study to do so in Portugal. Studies based on different samples might provide important evidence to prevent hasty conclusions about IPV prevalence and patterns and to guide empirically driven policies.</p>","PeriodicalId":46991,"journal":{"name":"European Journal on Criminal Policy and Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9170125/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal on Criminal Policy and Research","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10610-022-09514-w","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Intimate partner violence (IPV) is a major concern across the world, and its prevalence assessment has been a priority in numerous countries. However, data about IPV prevalence in Portugal is scarce and not up-to-date. This study aims to estimate IPV prevalence in Portugal. A community sample of 1392 adults (77.4% female, mean age = 34.95 years, SD = 12.80) was collected through a web-based survey, between March and June of 2020. Participants completed a sociodemographic questionnaire and the Conflict Tactic Scales-2 (CTS-2). Accounting for all forms of IPV, a past-year prevalence of 64.4% and 64.6% were found, for victimization and perpetration, respectively. Regarding gender or sexual orientation, no significant differences were found in the past-year or the lifetime prevalence, neither concerning frequency. Directionality and dyadic concordance types were analyzed and showed that most violence was bidirectional. Having perpetrated violence in previous intimate relationships was the most influential factor when predicting past-year perpetration or victimization. Other significant predictors were age, being victimized before 15 years old, cohabitation with the intimate partner, and drug use, but the last two were only significant for victimization. Findings support the idea that IPV is a relevant phenomenon, regardless of gender and sexual orientation. It is the first nationwide, gender-inclusive study to do so in Portugal. Studies based on different samples might provide important evidence to prevent hasty conclusions about IPV prevalence and patterns and to guide empirically driven policies.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
葡萄牙社区样本中亲密伴侣暴力的流行率、方向性和累犯类型:一项性别包容性调查
亲密伴侣暴力(IPV)是全世界关注的一个主要问题,对其发生率进行评估已成为许多国家的优先事项。然而,葡萄牙有关 IPV 发生率的数据很少,而且不是最新的。本研究旨在估算葡萄牙的 IPV 发生率。2020 年 3 月至 6 月期间,通过网络调查收集了 1392 名成年人(77.4% 为女性,平均年龄 = 34.95 岁,SD = 12.80)的社区样本。参与者填写了一份社会人口调查问卷和冲突策略量表-2(CTS-2)。在考虑到所有形式的 IPV 后,发现过去一年的受害率和施暴率分别为 64.4% 和 64.6%。在性别或性取向方面,过去一年或一生中的发生率以及发生频率均无明显差异。分析表明,大多数暴力行为都是双向的。在预测过去一年的施暴或受害情况时,在以前的亲密关系中施暴是最有影响力的因素。其他重要的预测因素包括年龄、15 岁前受害、与亲密伴侣同居和吸毒,但后两者仅对受害具有重要影响。研究结果支持这样一种观点,即 IPV 是一种与性别和性取向无关的现象。这是葡萄牙第一项全国性的、性别包容的研究。基于不同样本的研究可能会提供重要的证据,以防止对 IPV 的普遍性和模式做出草率的结论,并指导以经验为导向的政策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
5.90%
发文量
31
期刊介绍: The European Journal on Criminal Policy and Research is a peer-reviewed criminology journal, with an international and interdisciplinary focus. It welcomes submissions from Europe and well beyond, from different disciplines and traditions, where crime issues are connected to their socio-, psychological and economic contexts. The focus of its peer-reviewed coverage is on understanding crime trends in different geographical and socio-economic contexts, on presenting innovative crime prevention policies and practices, presenting innovative methodologies, and on following legislative and institutional change. The journal aims to strengthen the link between research and policies in the area of crime and justice, and welcomes submissions with a policy-related component.Discussion includes the trade-off between security and rights and ways to optimize the effectiveness of criminal justice systems with respect to human and civil rights. Recognizing that criminal justice systems are not the only method for dealing with crime, the journal also devotes attention to alternative policies and practices.Its four annual issues include one thematic issue and three that are open to various contributions.
期刊最新文献
A Comparison of Public and Police Perceptions of the Seriousness of Crime Looking for a preventive approach to sexual harassment in academia. A systematic review Short-Term Effectiveness of an Alcohol Ignition Interlock Programme: A Retrospective Cohort Study in the Netherlands Do Awareness Campaigns Reduce Financial Fraud? Trapped in an Abusive Relationship with an Organized Crime Offender: the Importance of Mental Health Support
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1