Administrative reforms in the Italian National Recovery and Resilience Plan: a selective approach to bridge the capacity gap

IF 2.2 Q2 POLITICAL SCIENCE Contemporary Italian Politics Pub Date : 2022-09-30 DOI:10.1080/23248823.2022.2122132

Fabrizio Di Mascio, A. Natalini, S. Profeti

引用次数: 3

Abstract

ABSTRACT The article investigates the impact of the National Recovery and Resilience Plan, complemented by changes in the composition of government at the domestic level, on the patterns of administrative reforms in Italy. We draw on research arguments that rest on historical institutionalism, which constitutes an established approach to the study of administrative reforms. We elaborate on how history has connected well-established patterns of administrative reform to the design and governance of the NRRP measures that aim to provide better public services. We find the strongest support for the research arguments derived from the reactive approach to policy sequencing, entailing the co-existence of pre-pandemic patterns and innovative policy features

查看原文

微信好友朋友圈 QQ好友复制链接

本刊更多论文

意大利国家复苏和复原计划中的行政改革：弥合能力差距的选择性方法

摘要:本文研究了国家复苏和弹性计划对意大利行政改革模式的影响，并辅以国内政府组成的变化。我们借鉴了基于历史制度主义的研究论点，这构成了研究行政改革的既定方法。我们详细阐述了历史如何将既定的行政改革模式与旨在提供更好的公共服务的NRRP措施的设计和治理联系起来。我们发现，对政策排序的反应性方法得出的研究论点得到了最有力的支持，这种方法涉及大流行前模式和创新政策特征的共存

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文去求助

来源期刊

Contemporary Italian Politics Social Sciences-Political Science and International Relations

CiteScore

4.40

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： Contemporary Italian Politics, formerly Bulletin of Italian Politics, is a political science journal aimed at academics and policy makers as well as others with a professional or intellectual interest in the politics of Italy. The journal has two main aims: Firstly, to provide rigorous analysis, in the English language, about the politics of what is one of the European Union’s four largest states in terms of population and Gross Domestic Product. We seek to do this aware that too often those in the English-speaking world looking for incisive analysis and insight into the latest trends and developments in Italian politics are likely to be stymied by two contrasting difficulties. On the one hand, they can turn to the daily and weekly print media. Here they will find information on the latest developments, sure enough; but much of it is likely to lack the incisiveness of academic writing and may even be straightforwardly inaccurate. On the other hand, readers can turn either to general political science journals – but here they will have to face the issue of fragmented information – or to specific journals on Italy – in which case they will find that politics is considered only insofar as it is part of the broader field of modern Italian studies[...] The second aim follows from the first insofar as, in seeking to achieve it, we hope thereby to provide analysis that readers will find genuinely useful. With research funding bodies of all kinds giving increasing emphasis to knowledge transfer and increasingly demanding of applicants that they demonstrate the relevance of what they are doing to non-academic ‘end users’, political scientists have a self-interested motive for attempting a closer engagement with outside practitioners.