Does the Use of Gender-Fair Language Influence the Comprehensibility of Texts?: An Experiment Using an Authentic Contract Manipulating Single Role Nouns and Pronouns

IF 0.8 Q3 Psychology Swiss Journal of Psychology Pub Date : 2019-03-25 DOI:10.1024/1421-0185/a000223
Marcus C. G. Friedrich, E. Heise
{"title":"Does the Use of Gender-Fair Language Influence the Comprehensibility of Texts?: An Experiment Using an Authentic Contract Manipulating Single Role Nouns and Pronouns","authors":"Marcus C. G. Friedrich, E. Heise","doi":"10.1024/1421-0185/a000223","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In many languages masculine nouns and pronouns can be interpreted to refer to both male and female referents. However, even when the authors expressly point out that masculine forms are being used to refer to both women and men, readers and listeners predominantly form mental images of men. A gender-fair language that uses either masculine and feminine forms or gender-neutral forms to refer to women and men more equally elicits mental images of women and men. Critics often argue, however, that gender-fair language makes texts less comprehensible (readable). The present study tests this assumption for the German language: 355 students read a randomly assigned text that either used masculine-only forms or consistently used both masculine and feminine forms. After that, they answered the comprehensibility questionnaire by Friedrich (2017). Participants who had read a text in gender-fair language did not give statistically significant lower ratings of comprehensibility than participants who had read a text that used masculine-only forms (partial &eegr;2 < .01; p > .05). The results indicate that the use of gender-fair language does not impair the comprehensibility of texts.","PeriodicalId":46193,"journal":{"name":"Swiss Journal of Psychology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2019-03-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"22","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Swiss Journal of Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1024/1421-0185/a000223","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Psychology","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 22

Abstract

In many languages masculine nouns and pronouns can be interpreted to refer to both male and female referents. However, even when the authors expressly point out that masculine forms are being used to refer to both women and men, readers and listeners predominantly form mental images of men. A gender-fair language that uses either masculine and feminine forms or gender-neutral forms to refer to women and men more equally elicits mental images of women and men. Critics often argue, however, that gender-fair language makes texts less comprehensible (readable). The present study tests this assumption for the German language: 355 students read a randomly assigned text that either used masculine-only forms or consistently used both masculine and feminine forms. After that, they answered the comprehensibility questionnaire by Friedrich (2017). Participants who had read a text in gender-fair language did not give statistically significant lower ratings of comprehensibility than participants who had read a text that used masculine-only forms (partial &eegr;2 < .01; p > .05). The results indicate that the use of gender-fair language does not impair the comprehensibility of texts.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
性别公平语言的使用是否影响文本的可理解性?使用真实契约操纵单角色名词和代词的实验
在许多语言中,阳性名词和代词可以被解释为既指男性又指女性。然而,即使作者明确指出男性形式被用来指代女性和男性,读者和听众也主要形成男性的心理形象。一种性别公平的语言,使用阳性和阴性形式或中性形式来更平等地指代女性和男性,会引发女性和男性的心理形象。然而,批评者经常认为,性别公平的语言使文本不太容易理解(可读)。本研究对德语的这一假设进行了测试:355名学生阅读了随机分配的文本,这些文本要么只使用阳性形式,要么一直使用阳性和阴性形式。之后,他们回答了Friedrich(2017)的可理解性问卷。与阅读仅使用阳性形式的文本的参与者相比,使用性别公平语言阅读文本的参与者的可理解性评分在统计学上没有显著降低(partial&eegr;2<.01;p>.05)。结果表明,使用性别平等语言不会损害文本的可理解力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Swiss Journal of Psychology
Swiss Journal of Psychology PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: General, Clinical, Social, Organizational, Developmental, Personality, and Biological Psychology.
期刊最新文献
Cross-Cultural and Environmental Influences on Facial Emotional Discrimination Sensitivity in 9-Year-Old Children from Swiss and Vietnamese Schools The Psychometric Properties of the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) Cognitive Reserve Mitigates Decline in Executive Functioning Following Hepatobiliary Diseases Modeling Value-Based Decision-Making Policies Using Genetic Programming Goals Do Not Buy Well-Being, but They Help
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1